Category: Resource & Information

  • More Than a House: Homelessness Resources

    More Than a House: Homelessness Resources

    Shelter is a necessary human right that influences physical and emotional well-being. Individuals without safe and stable environments are prone to increased stress, health problems, and poorer quality of life.

    What is Homelessness?

    Individuals without stable, safe, and functional housing are considered homeless. It’s one of the most visible social problems – it exists in some capacity in every single country throughout the world, but it’s one of the most common crises that the general public ignores. These are people who live outside, in cars and RVs, tents, or otherwise have no permanent place of residence.

    When talking about homelessness, related terms like houselessness and the state of being unhoused come up. Unhoused and houseless are terms that activists have begun using in recent years to reestablish the humanity that unhoused people have since most people subconsciously reject houseless people as their peers. The word “home” has a more personal connotation, whereas “house” applies just to a structure. To quote the common saying, if “home is where the heart is,” then homeless people do have homes since they still maintain a sense of self while unhoused – they just don’t have shelter.

    On the other end of the spectrum, terms like houseless and unhouse aren’t always popular since some activists perceive them as virtue signaling under the belief that exact language doesn’t matter as much as resolving the crisis at hand. Like all identifying language, it’s best to ask individuals in your local community what they prefer to be called: some might prefer being labeled as homeless, others might ask to be called a person experiencing houselessness.

    Other terms used to describe homelessness include squatters, refugees, vagrants, hobos, and tramps. The act of squatting is often political, where an individual or community purposely occupies a property they do not own, rent, or otherwise have lawful permission to use. Refugees are those who are forced to flee their home country out of safety, whereas internally displaced people (IDPs) are individuals who are forced to leave their home communities but remain in that country. The last three terms (vagrant, hobo, tramp) are all considered derogatory due to the negative way they’ve been used throughout the centuries.

    There are four main types of homelessness: transitional, episodic, chronic, and hidden. Houselessness is a spectrum that doesn’t discriminate based on age, race, gender, sexuality, or ability.

    1. Most homelessness is classified as transitional, or a brief state of homelessness due to a major life change or catastrophic event such as job loss, a health condition, divorce, domestic abuse, substance misuse, etc. Transitional houselessness is categorized as individuals experiencing housing instability for under one year. These people often (but not always) have jobs but can’t afford housing and other expenses – leading them to sleep in cars, outside, or couch surfing. Statistically, transitional homelessness consists of younger people who are harassed when seeking alternative housing. Due to their circumstances, these individuals rarely access homeless services – making them difficult to track or collect information on.
    2. Individuals who experience at least three periods of homelessness within the last year are labeled episodic homelessness. These people are often associated with disabilities, substance misuse, and mental health conditions that make them more prone to housing instability. While less likely to have stable or permanent employment, individuals experiencing episodic homelessness often have seasonal or minimum-wage jobs. Without adequate resources and support, episodic homelessness can easily evolve into chronic homelessness.
    3. Homelessness that has occurred for over a year is classified as chronic homelessness, especially if the individual has a disabling condition. Statistically, these individuals are often older, unemployed, and live on the streets or other unsafe places. Additionally, these folks are more likely to have a disability, mental health condition, or addiction that restricts their ability to climb out of homelessness. It is worth noting the phrase “the sidewalk is quicksand;” in countries like the United States, it is extremely easy to become unhoused and to escalate from transitional to chronic homelessness due to the hostile culture and resentments attached to being unhoused.
    4. Hidden homelessness refers to individuals who purposely live with others temporarily because they lack a permanent home. They’re considered hidden compared to the other three types since they rarely access housing resources or support, so they aren’t included in traditional houselessness data. These individuals are often younger and turn to friends, family, and neighbors to take shelter due to an inability to pay rent or afford other living expenses – but they can be further categorized as transitional, episodic, or chronic depending on how long, how often, or why they are experiencing housing instability.

    By the Numbers: How Common is Homelessness?

    Housing instability is difficult to compare reliably because it requires countries to self-report data and there are no consequences or motives for lying versus reporting honestly. It’s also difficult to track homelessness due to qualifiers that countries may use (ex: who exactly is ‘unemployed’ in the United States?), as well as other variables like hidden homelessness where a large portion of the houseless population doesn’t access social services and therefore can’t be counted by tracking data.

    According to the United States Department of Housing, approximately 770,000 people were considered homeless in 2024 – which comes out to about 0.2% of the American public. The US Census found that 11.1% of Americans live in poverty, which accounts for 36.8 million people. 48 states criminalize homelessness, and unhoused individuals are arrested for sleeping outside or panhandling in the majority of the country – which was affirmed by the 2024 Supreme Court ruling in City of Grants Pass v. Johnson. Even though homeless people technically hold the same civil rights as other Americans, they are targeted and harassed by law enforcement, legislation, and other members of the general public. The following chart is daily averages based on self-reported information throughout the world:

    COUNTRYHOMELESS POPULATIONHOMELESS PERCENTAGE
    United States771,0000.22%
    Canada235,0000.57%
    Mexico14,000,00010.89%
    Brazil281,0000.13%
    United Kingdom380,0000.56%
    Ireland14,0000.27%
    Spain29,0000.06%
    France330,0000.49%
    Germany263,0000.31%
    Italy96,0000.16%
    Switzerland2,2000.03%
    Sweden27,0000.26%
    Australia122,0000.46%
    New Zealand102,0001.96%
    Russia11,0000.01%
    South Korea9,0000.02%
    India1,770,0001.24%
    Japan3,0000.00%
    Kenya20,0000.04%
    Egypt2,000,0001.77%
    South Africa56,0000.09%

    As noted above, these figures are only rough estimates and self-reported – even though the United States has a relatively low percentage compared to Canada, the United Kingdom, or Australia, any American will cite how pervasive homelessness is in their communities regardless of how urban or rural it is. In countries like the US, homeless individuals are more likely to be arrested and imprisoned rather than counted for in these figures and given social services. Countries like Germany, France, and Spain have higher amounts of refugees seeking safety from persecution, which are included in their statistics. There are very few places like Japan and South Korea that have genuine near-zero rates of homelessness, although they still experience poverty and other social issues.


    What Causes Homelessness?

    There isn’t one sole reason why homelessness occurs and there isn’t one sole way to resolve it either. For some, homelessness is caused due to low wages and high living expenses that make it impossible to find a place to rent; others have difficulty maintaining an income due to a disability, mental illness, or drug addiction. Gentrification and unfair housing policies force families out of their homes, and countries without strong welfare safety nets or mutual aid communities fail to prevent the poverty that leads to becoming unhoused.

    While homelessness is inherently a housing problem, it is not only a housing problem. It’s impacted relational poverty, where unhoused individuals lose their family, friends, and community as society grows to see them as a burden that doesn’t belong. As such, all models that aim to resolve homelessness must reconnect homeless people as equal members of society. Otherwise, it is nearly impossible for chronically homeless people to escape their circumstances.


    Surviving the Night: Emergency Shelter

    If possible, overnight shelters are the best emergency option for those experiencing homelessness since they provide safety and protection from exposure to the weather. These shelters are temporary and generally only allow individuals to stay for one night at a time, so they aren’t great for building financial stability. Overnight shelters typically have specific intake hours but serve as a vital resource for those in critical need – in some communities, overnight shelters also act as warming and cooling centers to prevent hypothermia and heat exhaustion.

    Throughout most of the United States, 211 serves as the free three-digit hotline to connect individuals with social services including emergency overnight shelters. This service is provided in all US states, Washington D.C., and Puerto Rico and uses a network of nonprofit agencies to support users with emergency crisis care, shelter, financial assistance, food programs, and healthcare. The Homeless Shelters Directory also hosts an online directory that can be accessed without telephone service, although their range and information are more limited than local 211 providers.

    • 211 works under the assumption that you have access to a telephone with local network coverage – although some regions have 211 services available through online chat or mobile app. Most libraries will offer free phone services to patrons, as well as some businesses, and internet-based apps like WhatsApp allow users to make calls and send texts while connected to free internet such as in Walmart, coffee shops, and other community spaces.
    • Several government programs provide free cell phones if individuals meet certain income requirements or participate in other federal programs like SNAP, Medicaid, or SSI, such as the Federal Lifeline Program. Generally, unhoused individuals just have to submit proof of a government-issued ID, social security card, and/or birth certificate to be approved for a Lifeline cell phone.

    Another safe option for emergency shelter is doubling up, which refers to temporarily living with friends or family rather than on the street. Doubling up is often more stationary than overnight shelters, but still has similar challenges due to overcrowding, lack of privacy, and stress. On the other hand, one’s ability to double up is dependent on their connections to friends and family members who are willing and able to share space.

    The CDC estimates that 40% of homeless people live entirely unsheltered, such as in a car, outside, or other place considered unsafe for humans to reside. Individuals live in parks, bridges, subways, and makeshift camps to take care of their basic needs while carrying essential items with them like clothes, toiletries, blankets, and identification. Due to the exposure, living rough is unsafe compared to other alternatives from the risk of crime, violence, and weather. Despite this, some individuals prefer it to housing shelters since it provides more freedom than the rules and requirements shelters enforce. The legality of sleeping rough varies by region since the Supreme Court decision in City of Grants Pass v. Johnson upheld the constitutionality of arresting and imprisoning unhoused individuals for sleeping outside.

    Surviving Tomorrow: Primary Needs & Beyond

    Basic needs must be taken care of before people can become financially stable; it’s difficult to look past the night and find employment when you’re hungry and don’t know where you’ll be sleeping. Transitional shelters, as well as the methods described for overnight shelter and sleeping rough, fulfill the basic requirements for shelter and sleep – although transitional shelters provide an additional layer of safety and security.

    Transitional shelters, also referred to as interim shelters, allow unhoused people to reside for six to 24 months. These agencies provide significantly more comprehensive services than overnight shelters, such as regular food, employment assistance, case management, and counseling. Due to this, transitional services and related homeless shelters have entry requirements, applications, and stricter rules than overnight facilities. “Continuum of Care” agencies receive federal and state funding to provide local care to unhoused people, as well as connect them to larger programs geared to promote financial stability. The same resources like 211 and overnight agencies are the most reliable and up-to-date on nearby transitional shelter programs and case management.

    In cities with high homeless populations, mobile hydration units are installed to provide easy access to clean water. Most regions throughout the world have public tap water available through water fountains at parks, businesses, and other community spaces, although this water is normally unfiltered and can contain pollutants. While businesses are likely to reserve water as customer-only, most community centers, nonprofit organizations, homeless shelters, and libraries have readily available water sources. Both overnight and transitional shelters have in-depth knowledge of resources in their communities, but unhoused community members generally share their local tips.

    Both hot meals and pantry items with long shelf lives are necessary to feed unhoused people regularly. Soup kitchens provide free or inexpensive meals to their communities (housed or unhoused) – while the name implies they only serve soup, soup kitchens actually provide a large variety of meals based on charity. Similarly, locally owned restaurants and businesses are more likely to donate extra food both to their communities directly as well as to shelters. On the other end of the spectrum, food banks and pantries provide food for individuals to take with them and eat later.

    • The USDA National Hunger Hotline is available every Monday through Friday at 1-866-348-6479 to provide callers with information on emergency food options, government assistance programs, and social services in their communities. The Hunger Hotline also operates an automated text service at 914-342-7744.
    • Feeding America is the national network of food banks, pantries, and related programs throughout the United States. Their website allows users to virtually search for pantries locally based on their zip code without needing a cell phone, which is typically required for 211 programs and the Hunger Hotline.
    • Public schools and childcare centers throughout the United States are required to have free and reduced meal options for students during the regular school year via the National School Lunch Program, School Breakfast Program, and Special Milk Program. However, these programs are not always enough due to their limited accessibility and eligibility requirements that cause many students to accrue debt by buying lunch meals – which is why some districts and advocates support universal school meal programs to provide food to all students.
      • Summer Food Service Programs (SFSPs) and SUN Meals provide free meals to youth in low-income areas through a network of charitable or nonprofit organizations when schools are otherwise closed for instruction. The US Department of Agriculture has an online map for youth-related meal programs, although details on programs must be directed to local agencies.
      • Some school districts operate Breakfast After the Bell programs, where students are given free meals during their first-period classes to ensure all students have access to meals.
      • The USDA also provides after-school snacks and meals through the National School Lunch Program (NSLP) and Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) where youth are provided meals to enrolled students at participating public schools.
    • The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), also called food stamps, is a government program in the US that provides income for meals to low-income individuals. Money from SNAP can be used at participating supermarkets, farmer markets, and retailers throughout the country in addition to other programs like food banks.
    • The USDA maintains a national directory of farmer markets, which allow farmers and local retailers to sell products to their communities – often with government programs like SNAP and WIC.
    • The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children, or WIC, is a federal program through the USDA that provides meals, nutrition education, breastfeeding support, and medical services for new mothers, young children, and other eligible caregivers. Each state has individual rules on the income necessary to be eligible, which can range from 100% to 185% of the Federal Poverty Limit.

    While there are no federal or government programs for clothes, most charities and nonprofit organizations maintain individual programs to provide free clothes, blankets, pads and tampons, toiletries, condoms, and other essentials to better the health, safety, and well-being of their communities.

    Health emergencies don’t stop when you’re homeless – if anything, they’re more likely to happen. As mentioned in my medical resources post, there are options available for low-income and unhoused people to receive care:

    • The National Association of Free and Charitable Clinics has a complete list of over 1,400 clinics that provide free primary care and preventative services in the United States. These clinics can be used by anyone regardless of income status or need, and similar programs exist for dental and vision care.
    • Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) are federally funded health centers and clinics that provide care on a sliding scale regardless of your ability to pay. Some free and charitable clinics are FQHCs, but not all FQHCs are free and charitable clinics – the US Department of Health and Human Services has an online directory of FQHCs for users to find a clinic local to them.
      • In addition to primary care, FQHCs often hold community events for anyone in the public to receive limited preventative care like annual check-ups, immunizations, and screenings.
      • FQHCs and similar organizations offer non-emergency medical transportation (NEMT) to provide free transportation to medical appointments based on income status – but you’ll have to check with your clinic for details.
    • Free and Charitable Pharmacies operate under the same model as free and charitable clinics to dispense prescription drugs and services for free to their communities.
    • While it doesn’t provide prescription medications for free, GoodRX is a free website and mobile app that provides users with massive discounts to mark down costs to near manufacture costs at over 75,000 pharmacies across the United States, including at major retailers like Walmart, CVS, Costco, and Kroger.

    Special Populations & Extra Services

    Certain groups of people are considered high risk for homelessness and other issues like addiction and mental illnesses, which is why additional programs and services exist to serve these needs. The following groups are the most common special populations served, but they’re not the only marginalized group at an increased risk for homelessness.

    Veterans make up one of the largest groups within America’s homeless population, and account for about 13% of unhoused adults. Out of those veterans, half of them served in the Army followed closely by former Navy and Marines members. The United States spends over half of its annual budget on the military, but none of the military budget goes towards veterans – instead, it covers current salaries, equipment, facilities, and research. The Military-Industrial Complex (MIC) relies on low-income individuals to enlist for active benefits like healthcare and college education, but it fails to serve its veteran community. Veterans already have an increased risk of mental health issues and substance abuse while they attempt to transition to civilian life, leading them to become prone to homelessness if they are unable to secure a safety network with their loved ones and community. The following programs are national services provided via the Department of Veterans Affairs Homeless Programs to combat veteran homelessness, but are only applicable to veterans who were honorably discharged – veterans with dishonorable discharges are considered ineligible for VA services, but they can still use homeless programs for non-veterans.

    • The National Call Center for Homeless Veterans can be reached at 877-424-3838, which connects unhoused and at-risk veterans with housing solutions, healthcare, community employment, and other support services. They also operate the Homeless Veterans Chat for 24/7 confidential online support.
    • HUD-VASH is a collaborative program between the US Department of Housing and the Department of Veterans Affairs to provide free rental assistance vouchers for veterans to afford privately owned housing.
    • Low-income veterans and those at risk of becoming unhoused can use SSVF (Supportive Services for Veteran Families), even if they’re not eligible for HUD-VASH.
    • The Homeless Providers Grant and Per Diem (GPD) Program funds transitional housing and service centers for veterans through state, local, and tribal governments throughout the United States. The GPD Program allows veterans to stay up to 24 months while they’re seen by caseworkers to find alternative and more permanent housing.
    • The Domiciliary Care for Homeless Veterans (DCHV) Program is integrated with the Mental Health Residential Rehabilitation and Treatment Programs to provide residential care for veterans with eligible illnesses, challenges, or rehabilitative needs.
    • Veterans can find employment and vocational training under Homeless Veteran Community Employment Services (HVCES), which uses local community organizations and employers to give homeless veterans financial stability.
    • For those needing extra assistance, the Compensated Work Therapy (CWT) program allows homeless veterans to perform transitional work while preparing for competitive employment and HVCES.
    • The HCHV Program, HPACTs, and HVDP provide free healthcare, dental care, and case management to homeless veterans.
    • The American Legion is the largest US veterans organization that maintains programs for over 1.6 million members. Even though they are not owned by the federal government or VA, The Legion is only available for honorably discharged veterans.
    • The National Coalition for Homeless Veterans is a national organization that is not operated by the federal government and Department of Veterans Affairs, making it more eligible to serve dishonorably discharged veterans than official VA programs.


    38% of all domestic violence victims become homeless at least once in their lives, and nearly all homeless women have experienced severe physical or sexual abuse at some point. Survivors are often required to choose between ensuring an abusive relationship or becoming homeless since their housing situation is commonly tied to their relationship. Further, it’s not unusual for abusive partners to monitor and restrict their victim’s finances. As a result, many victims of abuse choose not to leave their partner due to the fear and instability that fleeing would bring.

    • The National Domestic Violence Hotline is supported by the US Department of Health and Human Services to operate a 24/7 telephone line, text service, and online chat to victims of domestic abuse and allies. The Hotline also maintains a directory of providers for users to locate help in their local communities.
    • Although The Salvation Army has a controversial history with LGBTQIA+ people, the entire organization has a long-standing reputation for assisting victims of domestic and sexual abuse find temporary shelter. Their programs provide rent and utility assistance, food, addiction support, counseling, housing, and community outreach.
    • The Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) is a federal law that regularly updates practices regarding domestic and sexual abuse throughout the country to match best practices. It also provides a large amount of funding that is used by shelters centered on victims of abuse while experiencing homelessness or need other support services.
    • The Domestic Violence and Housing Technical Assistance Consortium is a federal collaboration to provide training and resources to homeless shelters to better support survivors of domestic abuse.
    • The National Network to End Domestic Homelessness is a social change organization that works within policy and movements to create a world where domestic violence no longer exists, and also operates WomensLaw – a free online tool for anyone needing easy-to-understand legal advice on abuse.
    • StrongHearts Native Helpline provides 24/7 anonymous support for Native Americans and Alaska Natives who are impacted by domestic and sexual violence. The Tribal Resource Tool is an online directory of services available to Native survivors.
    • RAINN, or the Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network, is the largest anti-sexual violence organization in the United States and operates the National Sexual Assault Hotline at 800-656-4673, which is available to call 24/7 or message through online chat.
      • The Department of Defense Safe Helpline is a specialized service for members of the DoD community affected by sexual assault, giving them one-on-one support and resources through their call center. The DoD Safe Helpline is managed by RAINN to help those in the intersection of sexual and domestic violence while being an active or former member of the United States military, available by phone, online chat, mobile app, and forum.
    • The National Human Trafficking Hotline is operated by the US Department of Health and Human Services to allow victims of human trafficking as well as those concerned about trafficking in their communities to report anonymous tips. The Hotline’s referral directory provides users with an online database of anti-trafficking programs and organizations throughout the country based on their location.

    Approximately 10% of youth experience homelessness at a similar rate to veterans. Out of those youth, over 90% of them are between the ages of 18 to 24 – although, as mentioned previously, these individuals are the least likely to use homeless services and remain uncounted and hidden from the general homeless population. Many of these young people age out of the foster system, are LGBTQIA+, or are otherwise kicked out from their family homes with nowhere to go – leading them to become unhoused as soon as they meet the minimum age to be cast aside according to federal law.

    • Covenant House is the largest charity in North and Central America that provides shelter for unhoused young people and survivors of human trafficking. Their shelters accept individuals between the ages of 18 to 24 around the clock in nearly all major cities in the US.
    • Boys Town is a nonprofit organization with several locations around the United States that exists as one of the largest family care organizations in the nation that facilitates residential care in family-style homes to support at-risk youth regardless of gender.
    • Safe Place is a national youth outreach and prevention program for young people under the age of 18 in need of immediate help and safety. They have locations across the country and can be accessed by text for professional confidential help.
    • YMCAs and YWCAs often operate homeless shelters and other services for youth in their communities in major cities, similar to programs run by other religious organizations.
    • The National Runaway Safeline is the national communications system for runaway and homeless youth in the United States. Their call center provides 24-hour information on youth-related issues and services and can be reached by telephone, text, online chat, and forum. Their Home Free program partners with Greyhound Lines to transport runaway, homeless, and exploited youth to stable locations such as family homes, homeless shelters, transitional living programs, and other alternative living arrangements.
    • True Colors United is an agency centered on LGBTQIA+ and BIPOC unhoused youth since 40% of homeless youth identify as queer or transgender. As an advocacy organization, True Colors United guides policy on the federal, state, and local levels to be more inclusive when creating a world without homeless youth.
    • The Runaway and Homeless Youth Prevention Demonstration Project (RHY-PDP) provides federal funding to youth homelessness programs that serve individuals ages 22 and under to increase community resources and services available.
    • The Basic Center Program and Runaway and Homeless Youth Act grants funding to community-based organizations to give short-term emergency shelter, food, clothing, and medical care to young people under the age of 18.
    • Similarly, the Transitional Living Program is authorized by the Runaway and Homeless Youth Act to provide funding to organizations for living arrangements and shelter to youth between the ages of 16 to 22 while also giving access to life skills, education and vocational training, counseling, healthcare, and employment assistance.
    • The Maternity Group Homes for Pregnant and Parenting Youth Program is a federal service for pregnant and parenting youth between the ages of 16 and 22 who are experiencing homelessness to increase access to social services.
    • The Street Outreach Program supports organizations centered on unhoused youth, runaway youth, and street youth to help them find stable housing and social services to prevent sexual and physical exploitation.
    • The Foster Youth to Independence Initiative gives housing vouchers to young people between the ages of 18 to 24 in collaboration with public child welfare agencies to provide additional financial assistance.
    • Other federal youth-related homeless programs can be found at youth.gov, which contains current services operated by the United States government.

    People who are at risk of losing their primary residence within 14 days and do not have the resources to find another living arrangement are classified as imminently homeless. Imminently homeless individuals may not be able to have the full range of services provided to fully unhoused individuals, but they are still able to apply for programs to better their support systems through various social services.

    As mentioned previously, not all marginalized groups who are at an increased risk of homelessness have special services to combat their risk of being unhoused. Some regions may have programs and shelters specially catered for these causes, but they’re not nationwide. Some of these groups include LGBTQIA+ people, Black Americans, Native Americans, disabled people, and low-income households.


    Additional Homelessness Resources

    Alliance for Period Supplies hosts a network directory of organizations throughout the United States that provide free period products like pads and tampons.

    American Job Centers is a service sponsored by the US Department of Labor to provide free assistance to job seekers looking for employment or training.

    American Sexual Health Association operates Yes Means Test, a free tool that allows users to find free and confidential STD testing throughout the country based on their zip code and CDC information.

    Ample Harvest maintains a national database of farmers and community gardens that donate their surplus food to those in need, similar to food pantries and banks.

    Benefit Finder gives customized information on various government benefits and welfare programs to individuals in need, simplifying the process of researching programs.

    Civil Rights Corps is a nonprofit organization that gives case litigation and policy information related to low-income and homeless individuals, who often don’t have the resources to find alternative options.

    Community Action Partnership is a membership organization for agencies and groups that use federal funding to support individuals in need. Their map directory connects users with local organizations in their communities.

    Continuum of Care (CoC) are programs supported by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development to improve communities throughout the country and end homelessness. CoC funding can be used for homelessness prevention, supportive services, transitional housing, and permanent housing.

    Dress for Success is an international organization that connects women with free clothing and tools to become financially stable through employment.

    Emergency Rental Assistance Program (ERAP) are state and local programs that can be located via 211 to help people at risk of becoming imminently homeless.

    Eviction Lab is a research institution that tracks evictions throughout the United States to give individuals and their communities the tools necessary to confront unfair renting and housing practices.

    Fair Housing Assistance Program (FHAP) funds state and local agencies to administer fair housing laws as determined by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development and requires cities to ensure fair housing regulations.

    Food Not Bombs is a network of autonomous chapters that share free vegetarian food with those in need through grassroots activism in support of ending war and poverty around the world. Their directory map links users with chapters in their communities.

    Habitat for Humanity provides safe and affordable homes to low and moderate-income individuals based on their eligibility requirements, which require users to attend training and seminars, volunteer, or physically help during the building process of their future home.

    Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Resources is a federal agency through the United States government to administer national housing and development laws. HUD operates dozens of programs to improve local communities, and their offices can be located through their virtual map.

    Job Corps is the US’s largest free residential career training and education program for low-income individuals between the ages of 18 to 24, maintained by the US Department of Labor.

    Justia is a free collection of legal guides that explains laws, legal services, and policies around the world in everyday terms.

    LawHelp is a program ofย Pro Bono Networkย to bring the power of law to everyone regardless of education or class. In addition to explaining the law in everyday terms, LawHelp and Pro Bono Net also provide legal assistance to immigrants viaย Immiย and direct users to free legal documents as needed throughย LawHelp Interactive.

    Legal Services Corporation acts as the largest funder for civil legal aid for low-income Americans. As a publicly funded nonprofit established by Congress, LSC provides funding for civil cases like loan repayment, personal injury lawsuits, contract disputes, and class action lawsuits to individuals traditionally unable to sue on their own.

    Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) is administered by the US Department of Health and Human Services to provide federal funding assistance to households regarding energy and utility costs.

    Meals on Wheels is a national nonprofit organization that coordinates communities to deliver meals to individuals at home who are unable to purchase or prepare their own meals.

    Modest Needs provides short-term financial assistance to households in temporary crisis considered ineligible for other social services due to living just above the poverty level.;

    Money Management International is a free resource for financial education, providing easy-to-understand information and counseling on debt relief, housing services, and budgeting.

    Naloxone for All is a network of affiliated programs throughout the United States that provide free naloxone as a means to avoid opioid overdose and harm reduction in affected communities. Their directory map connects users with mail programs in their state.

    National Alliance to End Homelessness is a nonpartisan organization that works with federal and local agencies to create an online hub of homeless-related resources and policies to support unhoused individuals and their communities.

    National Center for Homeless Education is operated by the US Department of Education to give training and information to organizations throughout the nation that interact with homeless populations.

    National Coalition for the Homeless is a national network of groups centered on ending and preventing homelessness that also has a strong focus on serving the immediate needs of unhoused people. Their resources help imminently and currently homeless individuals connect with programs in their area.

    National Employment Law Project is an advocacy organization that works with policymakers to improve the lives of workers across the country.

    National Foundation for Credit Counseling connects individuals with certified credit counselors for free to improve their money management, debt payment plans, and credit scores.

    National Homelessness Law Center uses the law and litigation to ensure unhoused individuals in the United States are treated humanely and are aware of their legal rights.

    National Housing Law Project advances housing justice in low-income communities by fighting for the legal rights of tenants and low-income homeowners. NHLP’s resource center directs users to federal programs and laws like tax credits, rental assistance, vouchers, and public housing.

    National Network for Youth is a youth-centered homeless agency that works in communities with young people at risk of becoming unhoused through service providers and welfare organizations in the United States.

    National Skills Coalition hosts a number of networks to connect job seekers with the training necessary to fill skilled jobs like healthcare, software, plumbing, and manufacturing.

    Operation HOPE uplifts communities through their programs to improve money management and create financial freedom.

    Planned Parenthood is the largest reproductive health services provider in the United States. Although not an FQHC, Planned Parenthood has several safety nets in place to see patients regardless of their ability to pay. In addition to screenings, gender-affirming care, and abortion services, Planned Parenthood also provides free condoms, emergency contraception, and sexual education – including trained counselors available via online chat.

    Projects for Assistance in Transition from Homelessness (PATH) is operated by the US Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration to fund programs for unhoused individuals with mental illnesses, which includes housing, healthcare, job training, education, mental health counseling, and outreach in all US states and territories.

    Propel App connects individuals using United States welfare programs like EBT and SNAP with additional tools, discounts, and benefits via their free mobile app partnered with the White House and other federal organizations.

    Redditย is a social media platform that operates through thousands of forums (referred to as subreddits) for users to find related communities and discussions. Relevant health subreddits include: r/homeless, r/almosthomeless, r/vagabond, r/vandwellers, r/Survival, r/urbancarliving, r/StealthCamping, r/transitions, r/povertyfinance, r/Assistance, r/jobs.

    Second Chance Employment refers to employers who will hire and provide career advancement to people with criminal records, who are traditionally denied jobs and therefore at an increased risk of homelessness.

    Senior Farmers’ Market Nutrition Program (SFMNP) is a USDA program to provide low-income seniors with locally grown produce similar to SNAP and WIC programs at farmer markets.

    ShelterApp is a mobile app available for Android and Apple devices – although it can also be accessed through non-mobile devices through its web function. The app displays shelters and resources for homeless youth across the entire United States (as well as other services for individuals in Colorado).

    SkillUp America is a US nonprofit that helps individuals find high-opportunity employment through job training and career advice, regardless of their current education level.

    Supplemental Security Income (SSI) provides monthly income to individuals with disabilities who have little other financial resources. SSI is different from SSDI (commonly referred to as “disability”), which requires a minimum recent work history but has no income requirements whereas SSI has no work history requirements but has income limitations.

    Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TNAF) is a federally funded and state-operated program that provides economic stability and security to low-income households that meet their eligibility requirements.

    Unemployment Insurance (UI) refers to the number of programs handled by the US Department of Labor and state agencies to provide benefits to eligible workers who have become unemployed through no fault of their own while securing alternative employment.

    United Way operates 211 to mobilize communities to serve those most vulnerable – in the event phone contact is not possible, United Way allows users to locate their local United Way agency through their website.

    Volunteers of America is the largest comprehensive human services organization in the United States and uses their affiliate chapters to provide mental health, family services, food, clothing, affordable housing, and emergency shelter to individuals in need.

    Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP) gives funding and resources to low-income households to become more energy-efficient and lower energy costs via tax credits and rebates.

  • Navigating Healthcare: Medical Health Resources

    Navigating Healthcare: Medical Health Resources

    Everyone deserves equitable healthcare to live happy and healthy lives – it’s a human right. Continue reading for information about navigating the healthcare system, or skip to the bottom for my resource list. Looking for mental health resources instead? Click here.

    While not a focus of this article, it’s important to note that health is holistic. Health isn’t the state of just not being sick – it is a commitment to take care of all aspects of your health, including your physical health, mental health, social health, environmental health, etc.

    Types of Medical Healthcare

    The human body is complex, which is why so many different healthcare fields exist. Providers spend years learning their practice to give the best care possible to their patients. However, knowing the difference between types of providers helps – you don’t need to go to a specialist whenever you want a flu shot.

    The healthcare provider that you see most often is likely a primary care provider. These individuals serve as the first point of contact for most people’s health needs, usually employed at community health clinics, offices, and hospitals. Primary care providers (PCPs) cover a variety of health concerns to improve access to continuous and comprehensive care in their communities. From vaccinations and yearly checkups to routine screenings, PCPs manage the daily health concerns of the public – referring out to specialists as needed.

    For health concerns that can’t be treated easily by a PCP, patients are directed to specialists who have additional training in their field. Most specialists work from private practices, clinics, and hospitals to see individuals as needed. In the United States, individuals often need to be referred by a PCP before they can be seen by a specialist – although there are exceptions like gynecology specialists generally don’t need referrals. The referral system ensures patients see the correct specialist for their condition, as well as make sure their treatment will be covered by insurance.

    As noted above, a majority of preventative services can be done with a PCP – and many can also be accomplished through a retail clinic as described below. Preventative healthcare refers to free or low-cost services like immunizations, cancer screenings, and STD/HIV testing. PrEP, birth control, diabetes screening, and depression exams also fall under preventative care, which must be covered by all healthcare insurance plans in the US – even if you haven’t met your deductible. However, preventative care is only able to be covered for free or low cost through your plan if you get it from a PCP or another approved provider.

    Walk-in clinics located in retail stores, supermarkets, and pharmacies are called retail clinics, convenient care clinics, or nurse-in-a-box. Retail clinics are usually operated by physician assistants and nurse practitioners rather than fully fledged doctors, providing low-cost care for uncomplicated minor illnesses and preventative services. Compared to PCPs, fewer services are provided for free or covered by insurance – but the quantity of retail clinics keeps their costs substantially low and accessible even when community health clinics and hospitals aren’t available. Common US retail clinics include CVS, Walgreens, Target, Walmart, and Kroger, which offer a range of care for colds, flu, allergies, burns, sprains, UTIs, health screenings, physical exams, and vaccinations.

    Healthcare services provided virtually, such as through video call, remote monitoring, or the phone, are known as telehealth. Telemedicine may not be fully available through all medical providers and conditions, but allows patients to save time and resources when physical visits aren’t doable. Most providers offer telehealth in some fashion, such as allowing patients access to virtually message their providers. As such, telehealth is a substitute for PCP and specialist care – services like vaccinations and laboratory exams require in-person visits.

    Occasionally, care is needed due to an emergency even if there isn’t time to see a primary care provider. PCPs and specialists require appointments and aren’t viable for immediate or life-threatening emergencies. Urgent care clinics serve as the middle ground between PCPs and emergency care and are the best option for minor illnesses, injuries, or other conditions that can’t be resolved by a retail clinic and can’t wait for an appointment. These clinics have set hours where anyone can walk in for care, including basic labs and X-rays, with shorter wait times and lower costs than emergency departments. In comparison, emergency departments treat life and limb-threatening health conditions for anyone who needs immediate medical attention. They’re staffed 24/7 with physicians, nurses, and specialists best suited for severe situations – but can be notoriously expensive in the United States. A number of PCPs have same-day care options for non-emergencies that don’t require an appointment similar to urgent care clinics.


    What Exactly is Healthcare Insurance?

    Even in countries with universal healthcare, medicine isn’t free regardless of whether the patients have to pay themselves or it’s covered by government taxes. Universal healthcare refers to health systems that provide care to all people regardless of their ability to pay – but there are four major types of health systems. The majority of countries use one of the major systems, while the United States uses all four in some capacity.

    Most often referred to as socialized medicine, the Beveridge model was created in the United Kingdom through the work of Sir William Beveridge and Nye Bevan through the National Health Service (NHS). Reformed welfare services and the NHS were promised in Bevan’s successful campaign against Winston Churchill to give British citizens better medical treatment through taxation. True Beveridge models provide healthcare almost entirely through the government and taxpayer dollars, where medical facilities are government-owned and providers are employed by the government.

    Societies with Beveridge models usually see healthcare as a responsibility of the government the same way roads and schools are funded by the government. Economically, the government’s service removes competition within the healthcare market and purposely keeps costs low. Since the Beveridge model provides treatment to all citizens regardless of income, it’s one of the main universal healthcare systems used throughout the world. Countries that use some form of the Beveridge system include the United Kingdom, Spain, Cuba, and New Zealand. In the United States, we use the Beveridge model to operate medical services within the Department of Veterans Affairs, Indian Health Service, and Federal Bureau of Prisons.

    The Bismarck model earned its name through the work of German chancellor Otto von Bismarck, who created a new healthcare system after a series of economic crises in the German Empire. In true Bismarck models, healthcare is privately funded through insurance companies – which are paid by employers and employees through mandatory payroll deductions to reimburse private medical facilities for their care. In the majority of Bismarck systems, a percentage calculated by the government is taken from citizens’ income – which most citizens use for the public healthcare system managed by non-profit organizations to keep medical costs low. Additionally, the government’s involvement in the calculation prevents price inflation in the market.

    Most Americans use a version of the Bismarck model, where commercial healthcare insurance is provided by an employer to finance treatments. Other countries that use the Bismarck system include Germany, France, and Japan. Unlike other countries with the Bismarck model, a strong criticism is that the United States does not keep medical costs low due to the overbearing market commercial insurance has on treatment due to the lack of government involvement.

    Another version of socialized medicine comes from the national health insurance model, which combines the Beveridge and Bismarck systems. In the NHI model, the government funds medical treatments through taxation (like the Beveridge system) at mostly private healthcare facilities (like the Bismarck model). NHI is another type of universal healthcare since the government is single-payer and does not use commercial insurance.

    Canada is the world’s primary example of the NHI model, although many other countries use the NHI system in some capacity rather than true Beveridge or Bismarck models like South Korea, Australia, and Italy. Americans who use Medicaid or Medicare operate under an NHI model since the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services is the single-payer government agency that covers medical treatments provided by private healthcare companies.

    In low-income countries, there are very few resources to provide its citizens with strong healthcare – medical treatment is only given to citizens who can pay to receive that care, and no care is given to those who cannot afford it under the uninsured healthcare model. Some exceptions exist, such as free vaccines or charitable nonprofits that provide services – but comprehensive care is limited to those who can afford it.

    Countries that operate on the uninsured healthcare model include Nigeria, Armenia, and Cambodia. Millions of Americans also fall under the uninsured model and are expected to pay for medical care at clinics, urgent care centers, pharmacies, and laboratories unless they have another form of insurance.

    Okay, but how do I navigate insurance?

    Compared to other countries, healthcare is disproportionally more expensive in the United States. The US is the only high-income country in the world that does not guarantee health coverage to all its citizens, relying on the majority of people to purchase commercial insurance – which is notorious for denying care, regardless of how medically necessary it may be.

    Additionally, American healthcare insurance does not promise fewer medical bills since commercial insurance uses contract loopholes like deductions – a minimum amount of medical expenses individuals have to pay every year before insurance companies will begin covering the cost. Breaking an arm in the United States will cost you up to $16,000 if you don’t have healthcare insurance – and may still be pricey with insurance. In any high-income country, the cost of breaking that same arm can be as low as zero. Outside of the United States, costs only accrue if you choose to use a private doctor rather than the public health system. This comparison can be made to any medical procedure – like childbirth, cancer treatment, diabetes management, abortion services, surgeries, and so forth. Worst still, the United States managed to have the worst quality of healthcare among high-income countries.

    NOTE: Individuals can be covered by more than one healthcare policy as listed below. In other words, having commercial healthcare insurance does not prevent you from also having WIC if you are eligible under your state’s standards. Young people can be covered by both their parents’ healthcare insurance as well as Medicaid. Generally speaking, people are encouraged to use and apply for as many benefits as they are eligible for.

    Medicaid: Healthcare for Low-Income Households

    Each US state and territory has its own requirements for Medicaid, a joint federal and state program that provides free health coverage to low-income individuals. The Modified Adjusted Gross Income formula calculates the maximum income a household or individual can make and still qualify for Medicaid, which uses various income types like salaries, investments, pensions, and child support to determine someone’s need level for where they live.

    In 10 US states, single adults are not allowed to qualify for Medicaid – only families, the elderly, and those living with disabilities can qualify for Medicaid. These states include Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Mississippi, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Wisconsin, and Wyoming – which are ironically some of the poorest states in the country that offer very few opportunities for individuals to grow their economic status. Every other state qualifies individuals for Medicaid if they make up to 138% of the Federal Poverty Level – making the maximum income limit $20,782.80 for 2024. For each additional member of the household, like children, the maximum limit increases. Additionally, citizenship status is not necessarily required eligibility – some states like Colorado, Illinois, California, and Georgia cover immigrants based on their own qualifications. Click here to search for Medicaid results relevant to where you live, or visit the federal Medicaid and CHIP Scorecard to review your state’s Medicaid policies compared to other states.

    CHILDREN’S HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM (CHIP)
    CHIP is a Medicaid program that extends federal and state funds for comprehensive health insurance for uninsured children – originally implemented to cover American youth with household incomes too high for traditional Medicaid but too low to have commercial insurance.

    As with Medicaid, states are given flexibility to design their CHIP programs and the eligibility requirements to apply. Most states begin CHIP coverage when families make 133% of the Federal Poverty Limit, although there is a great deal of range compared to Medicaid – eligibility changes whether the child is an infant, between the ages of 1 to 5, or 6 to 18 and some states like New Mexico, California, Iowa, and New Hampshire cover families up to 380% of the FPL. CHIP-eligible households can still be eligible for traditional Medicaid if they meet their state’s standards. Similar to Medicaid, immigrant status does not affect CHIP eligibility if state requirements allow non-citizens to apply.

    Unlike commercial insurance (which covers youth under their parent’s insurance until age 26), young people lose CHIP and become uninsured upon reaching 19. On their nineteenth birthday, young people are able to apply for general Medicaid coverage if they are eligible under their state’s requirements or pursue an insurance alternative.

    WOMEN, INFANTS, AND CHILDREN (WIC)
    The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) is a federal program through the US Department of Agriculture to provide healthcare and food assistance to low-income pregnant women, breastfeeding women, and children under the age of 5. All states must cover households making between 100% to 185% of the Federal Poverty Limit, although many states automatically cover people already using welfare programs like SNAP, Medicaid, and TNAF.

    Caregivers like fathers, grandparents, and foster parents are also eligible for WIC programs since WIC aims to support any and all major caregivers with young children. Pregnant people are able to be covered by both CHIP and WIC, as well as Medicaid – women are covered by either CHIP or Medicaid in addition to WIC in all states beginning at 138% of the FPL. Like Medicaid and CHIP, immigrant status does not affect WIC eligibility if state requirements allow non-citizens to apply.

    MEDICARE
    Not to be confused with Medicaid (as defined above), Medicare is a federal healthcare program that provides care to both people with disabilities as well as older people ages 65 and older. Like Medicaid, Medicare is managed federally by the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services – but unlike Medicaid, it does not have any income requirements. All individuals who meet either the age or disability requirement are eligible, although the amount of assistance given can vary based on household income.

    As a federal service, Medicare covers hospital care, outpatient services, private plans, and self-administered prescription drugs through well-defined program guidelines. Since it is not run through individual states, Medicare is less flexible than programs like Medicaid and CHIP but has less discriminatory variation. Similar to the above programs, non-citizens are eligible for Medicare if they meet the basic Medicare requirements and meet a residency requirement of lawfully living in the United States for at least 5 years.

    Special Status: Veterans, Native Americans, and Prisoners

    Unlike the programs in the previous section, which use the National Health Insurance model, healthcare coverage for veterans, Native Americans, and prisons use the Beveridge system.

    VA HEALTHCARE
    Individuals who have served in the armed forces and have not received a dishonorable discharge are eligible for healthcare offered through the US Department of Veterans Benefits. Generally, veterans become eligible after serving at least 24 continuous months or serving prior to 1980. Current service members are eligible for TRICARE, the healthcare program run by the Department of Defense. In both programs, family members of active service members and veterans are eligible for coverage. There are no minimum income requirements for eligibility, given that veterans and their families meet the standard service needed for coverage.

    VA healthcare provides comprehensive coverage to veterans, similar to Medicaid. As a Beveridge model of healthcare, veterans have the choice to use their public benefits and healthcare coverage or choose a private provider – typically, VA healthcare only covers providers through the public system as approved by the government but gives veterans the ability to choose private professionals using other coverage like commercial insurance or Medicaid.

    INDIAN HEALTH SERVICES
    All Native Americans who are recognized within a Federally recognized tribe are eligible for healthcare coverage through the Indian Health Service, a federal agency that operates within the US Department of Health and Human Services. As a Beveridge program, individuals are allowed to receive alternative coverage for non-IHS providers similar to the VA healthcare system. Once approved by the IHS, individuals are fully covered for services regardless of income. However, individuals lose their IHS eligibility if they are not residing in an official IHS district, such as a reservation – which denies Indian Health Services to many Native Americans who live in urban areas.

    INCARCERATED INDIVIDUALS
    Individuals currently serving a term in prison or jail are classified as incarcerated, which prohibits them from using Marketplace healthcare insurance – the commercial standard for healthcare in the United States. Further, while inmates can apply for Medicaid coverage, they cannot use Medicaid for any medical care while incarcerated.

    Incarcerated people are one of the few groups in the United States entitled to a protected constitutional right to healthcare, as determined by Estelle v. Gamble (1976). This means that all individuals in US jails or prisons are entitled to healthcare services – however, the quality of that care varies drastically since there are no standards on what minimum healthcare must be provided for free.

    Most facilities, even if they are accredited by the National Commission on Correctional Health Care or the American Correctional Association, enforce copays on inmates which are disproportionally high compared to the amount of income incarcerated people can make while serving time. On average, inmates make between $0.25 to $0.86 per day – while a single sick visit might be $13, which deters most inmates from receiving care. The federal law only states that jails and prisons must provide care based on previous court cases, and does not regulate its quality or cost – to further case law, more lawsuits must be filed, which are intentionally difficult for incarcerated individuals to pursue.

    The Marketplace: Healthcare for America

    The Healthcare Insurance Marketplace, also known simply as the “Marketplace,” is the primary place most Americans find commercial healthcare insurance if they do not fall into one of the above categories like Medicaid, CHIP, Medicare, IHS, VA, TRICARE, etc. It originated from the 2010 Affordable Care Act or Obamacare – while it has been altered slightly, it gives millions of Americans the ability to choose their coverage. The Marketplace also determines eligibility for other government healthcare programs, such as Medicaid.

    The Marketplace displays all available insurance options based on demographics and income status to users, listing available benefits alongside prices. Anyone at least 18 years old and not currently incarcerated is eligible for the Marketplace as long as they are lawfully living in the United States and not eligible for Medicare. As commercial plans, each insurance has individual contracts with varying deductibles, copays, and limitations.

    Similar to Marketplace insurance, the majority of US employers are required to offer their employees private healthcare insurance options. Like Marketplace plans, private insurance plans vary in nature – the primary difference between them is that anyone can use insurance through the Marketplace, while employers use private plans to give very similar options to Marketplace coverage. Only small employers with 50 or fewer full-time employees can opt to not provide a private healthcare plan to their staff, according to the Affordable Care Act.


    Common Healthcare Barriers

    Due to the complexities described above, healthcare isn’t easy for all people to receive in the United States. Cost is one of the leading barriers in American healthcare since the potential expenses associated with both the care itself and healthcare insurance put off seeing medical providers as needed. Generally, this leads to fewer individuals receiving regular comprehensive and preventative care – prompting them to only instead pursue treatment in life-threatening emergencies. As such, many health-centered organizations have programs and initiatives to provide services:

    • Free & Charitable Clinics provide primary care and preventative services through nonprofit facilities, most often funded through grants and private donors. There are over 1,400 healthcare clinics that fall under this within the United States, which can be used by anyone regardless of income status or need. The National Association of Free & Charitable Clinics maintains a complete list relevant to the US, and similar programs exist for dental and vision care.
    • Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) refer to federally funded nonprofit health centers and clinics that provide services on a sliding scale, regardless of your ability to pay. Some free and charitable clinics are FQHCs, but not all FQHCs are free and charitable clinics – their status is determined by the amount of federal funding they receive to operate. The US Department of Health and Human Services maintains an online directory of FQHCs that provide primary care to those with Medicaid, Medicare, CHIP, or are otherwise unable to afford healthcare. FQHCs also regularly host community events where anyone in the public can receive limited preventative care like annual check-ups, immunizations, and screenings.
    • Direct Primary Care (DPC) is a new model of US healthcare that cuts out the use of insurance companies, instead having patients pay monthly membership fees directly to the healthcare facility rather than the insurance company. These fees give individuals access to unlimited primary care visits and lab work – but these practices don’t accept any forms of insurance, Medicaid, or government programs. Several websites, like the DPC Alliance, have online directories of DPC facilities around the country.
    • Free & Charitable Pharmacies are community pharmacies that use their nonprofit status to dispense prescription drugs and services for free through the same models used for free and charitable clinics.
    • GoodRx is a free website and mobile app that provides users with discounts for prescription drugs at over 75,000 pharmacies across the United States, including major retailers like Walmart, CVS, Costco, and Kroger. The site also serves as a price comparison tool, allowing users to find the lowest price possible for their medication. While pharmacies that accept GoodRx coupons almost always accept insurance, they do not accept insurance when used with GoodRx – which is why the website and app are best for individuals needing medication outside of insurance coverage.
    • Rx Outreach is a nonprofit online pharmacy that delivers medication via the mail regardless of insurance or citizenship status. Similar to GoodRx, Rx Outreach aims to make prescription medication affordable to all individuals in the United States by providing an alternative to commercial insurance and inflated medication prices.

    Even communities with infrastructure to off-put costs associated with healthcare struggle with transportation barriers. A lack of public transportation and lengthy travels physically bar individuals from receiving healthcare, especially in rural communities. Relatedly, most healthcare facilities operate during the same hours that the majority of individuals work – forcing them to request off work for medical appointments, as well as potentially lose income. Some initiatives and programs proposed to resolve these barriers include:

    • Improved public transportation improves more than just healthcare. Greater access to buses, subways, cable cars, trolleys, and other forms of public transit create an increased quality of life in all communities, regardless of whether it’s a major city or a rural area.
    • FQHCs and similar health-centered organizations offer non-emergency medical transportation (NEMT) to provide free transportation for medical appointments based on income status or use of Medicaid or Medicare through agencies like Uber Health and Transdev. Some healthcare insurance companies also provide NEMT as an added benefit policy on top of transportation services offered by healthcare facilities.
    • Telehealth and remote appointments allow individuals to get medical care, even if they live in a ‘healthcare desert’ and don’t have transportation. While telemedicine doesn’t apply to all care and screenings, it’s a basic step that brings individuals back into receiving healthcare.
    • While smaller healthcare practices operate during traditional work hours, many larger facilities and health organizations have later hours available. These hours are purposely set with working adults in mind, giving them the freedom of receiving care without having to request time from work and their pay.

    While not as universal as the other healthcare barriers mentioned, approximately 22% of people in the United States do not speak English as their first language at home. In rural areas, there is very little (if any) translation services available, which leads to miscommunication and worse health outcomes between patients and providers. Similarly, native English speakers lack healthcare literacy – the American healthcare system is complex, which pushes individuals away from receiving regular care.

    • FQHCs are required to provide translation services under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act and are not allowed to rely on patients with limited English proficiency to translate for them. These services may require advocacy in rural settings but are mandated by federal law to improve healthcare access through the use of bilingual staff, on-site interpreters, and telephonic interpretation services.
    • Healthcare providers should use common language that patients understand regardless of their education or background. While not a required practice, this difference sets good compassionate doctors from the rest of the crowd.

    The healthcare industry is steeped with centuries of discrimination and a lack of cultural understanding plays another major role in preventing individuals from receiving healthcare. Discrimination and bias related to race, immigration status, gender identity, and sexual orientation are considerable barriers to healthcare that isolate people from getting necessary care from trusted medical professionals they trust. Half of all transgender people report healthcare discrimination where a provider has used demeaning language against them or refused care entirely. Queer people experience disrespect at twice the rate that straight cisgender adults do with healthcare providers. These rates increase exponentially when other factors, like race, ethnicity, disability, and citizenship status, are accounted for.

    • All providers have ongoing educational requirements to continue practicing medicine, although the amount and type of continuous training varies by state. Regulations regarding the amount of training healthcare providers must continuously keep up-to-date on is necessary to ensure that providers use medically accurate and culturally competent information.

    Finding a Doctor Who Works

    Everyone deserves to see a primary care provider, and they deserve to feel safe and respected while doing so. A substantial proportion of the US population has anxiety regarding going to the doctor, which pushes them from receiving preventative care on time. While most people find doctor’s offices nerve-wracking because of the potential of hearing bad news, marginalized people like people of color and LGBTQIA+ people get anxiety due to previous bad experiences.

    It’s easier to find affirming doctors compared to LGBTQIA+-friendly retail clinics: even the smallest American towns (such as those with populations with 1,000 or fewer) have their own Reddit pages and Facebook groups. Doctors and providers that work from community clinics have detailed reviews through sites like Google, and research into their policies is relatively straightforward. To find a provider this way, you can either search through your healthcare insurance options and check the reviews of each available option, or find a recommended doctor by other people local to your community and then see how your medical coverage can apply.

    This is not the case with retail clinics, since they’re normally large corporations with nationwide brand names – Walgreens, CVS, and Walmart have official policies that forbid anti-LGBTQIA+ discrimination when seeing patients, but it’s harder to keep track of the actual practices of local stores. The staff that work at retail clinics have little to no continuous training requirements compared to other providers and sometimes just need a high school diploma or certificate for their role, which associates them and retail clinics with a lower quality of care and personal relationship than traditional providers. While it’s always difficult to report harassment, large-scale organizations are notoriously so; the assumption is that any retail provider can be discriminatory, and will continuously get away with it until someone gets through the red tape involved in reporting their ill behavior.

    It’s common practice to prepare before a medical appointment, especially if you have anxiety around it. Write down questions you have and list any concerns you’re having. You are fully allowed to ask about procedures, tests, and practices – and your doctor should take time to listen to your concerns. Going back to the above point, reviews matter: anyone can potentially provide healthcare if they have the time and resources to get a license, but not everyone has the compassion necessary to be a good doctor.

    You’re allowed to bring loved ones to your appointments, regardless of whether it’s a family member, significant other, or close friend. As long as they have your permission, it’s up to you if they stay in the waiting room or come with you to the doctor’s office. Having a loved one present while seeing a provider can bring comfort, accountability, and support – they’re there with you in the event you experience discrimination and can repeat any questions or concerns you have.

    Make medical appointments during times that won’t increase your stress. If you’re prone to being anxious at the doctor, avoid trying to squeeze in your visit during your 30-minute lunch break and opt for a less busy time.

    You have the right to hear a second opinion about major medical procedures and diagnoses. Each doctor is an individual with their own expertise, so it’s not uncommon to look for a second opinion if your symptoms aren’t improving or if your regular provider is unsure about what treatment options are best. Even though most providers get frustrated by people misleading themselves through online self-research, almost everyone searches symptoms, diagnoses, and treatments on the internet – and your provider should listen to your concerns and questions.


    Resources

    340B Drug Pricing Program is a federal initiative to disperse national funding to provide comprehensive health services and medications. The program intended to provide deep discounts and financial assistance to hospitals serving vulnerable communities by mitigating inflated prescription drug costs. However, retail pharmacies have contracted with 340B hospitals to exploit the program and charge further increased costs to consumers while profiting from the program’s discounts.

    American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) is a large organization that sets medical standards for family medicine and primary care. The Neighborhood Navigator coordinates and connects patients with over 40,000 social services via their zip code database, ranging from programs related to food, baby supplies, housing, transit, education, employment, and more.

    American Academy of HIV Medicine is an independent organization for healthcare professionals dedicated to HIV care and prevention. In addition to credentialing, the Academy offers up-to-date educational materials, data, and guidance on HIV/AIDS.

    American Public Health Association is a professional membership and advocacy organization for healthcare providers in the United States, dating back to its founding in 1872.

    CancerCare serves as the leading organization in the United States that offers free, professional support services and information to the public on cancer. CancerCare manages support groups, counseling, resource navigation, educational workshops, publications, and financial assistance – as well as an advice column for users to post cancer-related questions.

    CaringInfo, a program under the National Alliance for Care at Home, is an education and resource hub for end-of-life care. The organization provides support tools for patients, their families and caregivers, and healthcare professionals needing assistance navigating serious and terminal illnesses.

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is the official national public health agency of the United States that operates under the Department of Health and Human Services to control, prevent, and treat disease, injuries, and disability in the general public. The CDC is staffed by the current presidential administration to tackle ongoing health concerns and educate the American public.

    Drugs.com is a pharmaceutical encyclopedia that provides free information on drugs, side effects, and interactions – as well as a pill identifier and a phonetic search engine. It’s considered the most widely visited and up-to-date site for medication information.

    Federal Office of Rural Health Policy (FORHP) is the national agency under the US Department of Health and Human Services to provide healthcare to rural communities, which include approximately 61 million people.

    Get Covered Connector is a free tool for users to find assistance regarding their healthcare insurance through nonprofits and community coalitions local to their zip code. The site lists organizations available by telephone, virtual appointment, and in-person visits as well as whether the organization is considered LGBTQIA+ friendly.

    GLMA Health Professionals is the world’s largest and oldest association of LGBTQIA+ healthcare professionals. The Association has free educational materials and training for providers, as well as a detailed online directory of LGBTQIA+ friendly providers at lgbtqhealthcaredirectory.org.

    GoodRx is a free website and mobile app that provides users with discounts for prescription drugs at over 75,000 pharmacies across the United States, including major retailers like Walmart, CVS, Costco, and Kroger.

    Greater Than AIDS is a program under KFF (formerly known as The Kaiser Family Foundation or Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation) to provide the latest information about HIV and other STDs to underserved populations. Under its partnership with the CDC, Greater Than AIDS connects users to HIV services for testing, prevention, and treatment, as well as other related conditions like Mpox.

    Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) is a national agency under the US Department of Health and Human Services to improve healthcare access to individuals considered medically vulnerable, isolated, or otherwise uninsured. The HRSA operates a number of programs to help individuals receive medical care, which are also included within this section like Healthy Start and the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program.

    Healthy Start is an HRSA program for maternal and child health that connects new mothers with services for transportation, education, and housing assistance. By guiding individuals to existing programs through their directory, Healthy Start combats infant death while also eliminating health disparities.

    Human Rights Campaign is the largest LGBTQIA+ lobbying organization in the United States and maintains a wealth of resources related to queer and transgender health – including topics like the Affordable Care Act, healthcare rights, discrimination reporting, best practices for healthcare professionals, and their Healthcare Equality Index. The HEI conducts an annual survey of healthcare facilities across the country and ranks their policies and practices regarding LGBTQIA+ identities.

    Lambda Legal is an American civil rights organization that uses litigation and public policy to promote LGBTQIA+ equality in US law. One of their resource collections centers on healthcare and related information and news on LGBTQIA+ healthcare.

    LGBTQ+ Healthcare Directory is a free online database maintained by GLMA Health Professionals and the Tegan and Sara Foundation to connect users with information on local LGBTQIA+-friendly healthcare providers.

    Mayo Clinic is a not-for-profit medical group that provides free medical educational materials in addition to the real-world medical procedures they perform at their clinics. Their site search engine uses the expertise of over 3,000 physicians, scientists, and researchers to inform users about diseases, symptoms, and medical tests.

    MedlinePlus is an official service of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and National Library of Medicine (NLM) to provide high-quality and relevant health information that’s easy to understand. It is the world’s largest medical library and contains over 7 million journals, books, studies, reports, and microfilms that provide free access to various health topics, medical terms, diseases, drugs, exams, and genetic health information.

    Medscape is a news site that’s considered a go-to for clinicians and medical professionals around the world – as well as everyday patients. The site and its membership are completely free and offer up-to-date medical news, drug development updates, and information on clinical trials.

    MyHealthfinder is a service of the US Department of Health and Human Services to provide Americans with reliable information on wellness and prevention tools, including medical screenings and vaccinations. The site uses basic information from users to recommend best practices to stay healthy.

    National Coalition for LGBTQ Health is a medical advocacy organization that seeks to improve the health of LGBTQIA+ people through education and research. In addition to news and information about general health, the Coalition also maintains a Mpox resource center for up-to-date guidance.

    National LGBT Cancer Network is a resource site for cancer-related information and tools focused on LGBTQIA+ people. The Network runs multiple peer-support groups over online platforms such as Zoom and maintains a resource library on clinical information and screenings.

    National LGBT Cancer Project was founded alongside Out with Cancer as the first national LGBTQIA+ cancer survivor support and advocacy organization in the United States. The Project covers a range of cancer topics in addition to their clinical trial search and resource library.

    National LGBTQIA+ Health Education Center, a program of the Fenway Institute, provides educational resources and consultation to healthcare organizations interested in better serving LGBTQIA+ people. Their webinars, learning modules, and publications help further the continued education of healthcare professionals.

    National Maternal Mental Health Hotline is a free and confidential service available 24/7 through the HRSA for new and expecting mothers. Services are available in both English and Spanish via telephone or text.

    Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network Modernization Initiative is a federal program under the HRSA to increase funding related to organ transplants. The Health Systems Bureau manages the OPTN Dashboard, which makes data about organ transplants available to anyone in the United States.

    Orphanet is a specialized encyclopedia of rare diseases and conditions, featuring information on over 6,000 rare diseases. While less used than sites like MedlinePlus, Orphanet contains data on both rare conditions as well as exceptionally rare drugs.

    Out2Enroll connects LGBTQIA+ people and their families with any and all healthcare coverage options through the Affordable Care Act, including Medicaid, Medicare, and commercial insurance. O2E helps users compare plans based on LGBTQIA+ factors, like gender-affirming care or coverage for same-sex partners.

    OutCare is a nonprofit health organization that creates comprehensive resources, support, and educational materials to lead to equitable LGBTQIA+ health outcomes in the United States. The OutList Provider Directory sorts LGBTQIA+ affirming providers for users to locate by zip codes local to their communities. The free OutCare Saving Program provides discounts for prescription medications at smaller pharmacy retailers compared to GoodRx. OutCare also offers paid research opportunities, peer support, mentorship, training, and webinars.

    Point of Pride supports transgender and nonbinary health through a variety of programs, such as their trans surgery fund and HRT access fund. Other Point of Pride funds include the electrolysis support fund, thrive fund (for prosthetics, wigs, voice training, and other services traditionally considered medically unnecessary by insurance companies, and chest binder/femme shapewear fund.

    Poison Help, also known as Poison Control and the National Capital Poison Center, provides users with free information and resources about common poisons in over 100 languages through their mobile app, virtual chat, and telephone hotline.

    PubMed contains over 37 million medical publications through the National Library of Medicine to provide users with free access to biomedical literature around the world.

    Reddit is a social media platform that operates through thousands of forums (referred to as subreddits) for users to find related communities and discussions. Relevant health subreddits include: r/medical, r/AskDocs, r/AskHealth, r/Ask Vet, r/askdentists, r/medical_advice, r/Healthcare_Anon, r/medicine, r/HealthInsurance.

    Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program (also known as the HIV/AIDS Bureau) is the official US entity for HIV primary care, medications, and support services for low-income individuals living with HIV. The Bureau provides funding to local and state HIV organizations to better serve the general public.

    Rx Outreach is a nonprofit online pharmacy that delivers medication via the mail regardless of insurance or citizenship status. Similar to GoodRx, Rx Outreach aims to make prescription medication affordable to all individuals in the United States.

    SAGE is the United State’s largest advocacy and services organization for LGBTQIA+ elders. In addition to their HearMe app that provides queer and transgender elders with chat support, SAGE also operates an action coalition, Long-Term Care Equality Index (LEI), housing initiative, cultural competency training program, financial stability program, meal program, sexual wellness program, and the National Resource Center on LGBTQ+ Aging.

    Smart Patients is an online community that connects patients and their families with others affected by similar illnesses and conditions. While few paths are identical, Smart Patients offers users the ability to not walk their journeys alone through online support.

    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) is an agency within the US Department of Health and Human Services that leads national efforts on behavioral health and substance abuse. SAMHSA Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics (CCBHCs) operate similarly to FQHCs to provide care to people regardless of income status.

    Trans Health Project is operated by Advocates for Trans Equality and contains detailed guidance for users to navigate health insurance coverage best for their comprehensive healthcare.

    Trans Legal Health Fund is a service of the Transgender Law Center to provide transgender people with the financial resources necessary when facing investigation, arrest, or prosecution for seeking gender-affirming care.

    US Department of Health and Human Services is a group of federal agencies aiming to enhance public health for Americans. The HHS administers over 100 different programs across its agencies, including healthcare coverage, social services and TANF, research, training, preventative care, public health and safety, and emergency response plans.

    WebMD, which also owns Medscape, is one of the most visited websites for credible medical information. Like other sites listed, WebMD has a directory for information on diseases, medications, and symptoms – and also has a database of doctors through doctor.webmd.com.

    World Health Organization is a United Nations agency that leads global efforts to expand universal health coverage and emergencies so that everyone can attain the highest level of health regardless of where they live.

    World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), formerly known as the Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association, is the leading medical association on best practices for transgender health and provides professional and educational research for evidence-based medicine to best serve transgender and nonbinary people around the world.

  • Know Your Rights: Legal Resources

    Know Your Rights: Legal Resources

    Looking for information about the law and your rights? Get started here, or skip to read LGBTQIA+ rights on same-sex activity, age of consent, drag bans, marriage, family rights and adoption, censorship, education, employment, religious exemption, housing, military, conversion therapy, hate crimes, HIV/AIDS, prison, blood donations, gender documents, gender-affirming care, bathrooms, sports, intersex issues, and voting. Find referenced cases and resources here.

    Disclaimer: Most of these rights are centered on United States law. Please research your local laws and community organizations if you reside outside the US.

    Glossary & Definitions

    If there’s one thing people can agree on regarding the law, it’s that the legal system uses many confusing words with zero context for everyday people. Here are the top terms lawyers and legal experts want you to know.

    PLAINTIFF

    A person or group who initiates legal action by bringing up a lawsuit, claim, or complaint to court against someone else. Their job is to present their case, provide evidence, and seek some type of legal remedy – but they bear the “burden of proof,” which means they have to demonstrate that the defendant is responsible.

    Plaintiffs are in civil cases – court cases usually over money, injury, or personal rights between two groups. Criminal cases are led by government entities and use prosecutors instead of plaintiffs. In other words, anyone can be a plaintiff and go to civil court – only people representing the government such as “The United States of America” or “The State of Ohio” can lead criminal cases as prosecutors.

    DEFENDANT

    A person or group that a lawsuit has been filed against – someone else has filed legal action against you. In contrast to plaintiffs, defendants are in both civil and criminal cases and are given the task of defending themselves in court to undermine the plaintiff or prosecution’s allegations.

    JURISDICTION

    Whether or not a judge, court, or law has authority based on geographic location, subject matter, or the parties involved.

    GEOGRAPHIC JURISDICTION is based on the physical boundaries a law or court has power over. A court in Florida has the authority to pass judgment regarding a law in Florida, but they don’t have the authority to pass judgment on a case in Georgia. The legal system is separated into the federal (or national) level, state level, and local level – which is further separated into districts (also known as regions), counties, towns, and even neighborhoods. On the other end of the spectrum, cases involving international laws, wars, or countries themselves are judged in international court. Remember broad categories like international and national/federal refer to rights and laws that apply to everyone in the country, state rights and laws affect people who live in a specific state or territory, and local laws only apply in certain regions like cities or counties.

    SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION is based on the subject matter the court case is actually about. Not all courts are equal – even if they’re considered to be at the same level. There are specific courts for family law, tax law, criminal law, intellectual property law, etc. For example, family law courts can’t pass judgment over intellectual property cases and vice versa.

    PERSONAL JURISDICTION makes geographic jurisdiction more complicated. Personal jurisdiction applies to individuals when they break a law or commit some grievance – even if they’re physically outside of the geographic jurisdiction of that law. Prosecutors have to prove that they have a right to pursue personal jurisdiction cases that reside outside of their geographic boundaries. Within current events, personal jurisdiction is the most common force behind crimes and penalties put upon people seeking abortions or gender-affirming care across state lines.

    ORIGINAL/APPELLATE JURISDICTION is based on which courts get to pass judgment over a case first. Original jurisdiction refers to courts that have the authority to hear a case first, whereas appellate jurisdiction is reserved for courts that have the authority to review the decisions made by lower original courts. Appellate courts can reverse cases or require a re-trial if they believe something went wrong the first time, but they don’t judge cases on their own.

    DUE PROCESS

    The minimum legal requirements that legal systems have to provide to ensure fair and impartial decisions. In the United States, this means individuals do not lose their right to life, liberty, or property without a fair hearing – individuals must be given the opportunity to present evidence, confront witnesses, and have legal representation.

    DISCOVERY

    The process where parties involved in a lawsuit exchange information and evidence related to a case. Within the pre-trial phase of a lawsuit, both sides of a case are entitled to gather and review facts, documents, and testimonies for their argument. The discovery process is meant to ensure a fair and transparent case with the best chance for a negotiable outcome.

    PRECEDENT

    A legal decision that sets a standard for future similar cases. Precedents are most common within common law systems like the United States compared to civil law systems like the European Union. Courts are still allowed to make decisions different than previous cases, but they have to argue why they are choosing to rule differently – precedent is one of the foundations within our legal system meant to create consistency and predictability.

    STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS

    The time limit a legal claim or lawsuit must be filed to be considered valid. Claims have expiration dates, detailed by the subject matter, jurisdiction, and law – you have a set maximum time to file for alleged harm or risk your claim becoming lost. Statutes of limitations exist to provide certainty and finality to the law – as time passes, evidence is often lost and memories fade into less concise testimonies.

    PRO BONO

    Legal services that are provided for free or at a reduced rate to those in need. Pro bono work is most often performed by attorneys who want to provide aid to those who can’t traditionally afford it – like workers’ rights, immigration, civil rights, and criminal defense. It’s encouraged by most legal organizations and bar associations since it benefits the common good by allowing legal experts to give back to their communities.

    And in case that wasn’t enough legal jargon for you, the Administrative Office of the United States Courts maintains an extended glossary of legal words on their website.


    Know Your International Rights

    Every single human in the world is covered by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as well as the International Bill of Human Rights. Infringement on these rights is pursued by the International Criminal Court when they can’t be handled by individual countries – but their power varies depending on whether they are a regular presence on the international stage and member of the United Nations. Learn more about human rights by clicking here.

    Everyone is born free and equal.

    Everyone is equal, regardless of race, color, language, religion, politics, or national origin.

    Everyone has the right to live in freedom and safety.

    Everyone has the right to be free from slavery.

    Everyone has the right to be free from torture.

    Everyone has the right to be recognized by the law.

    Everyone is considered equal before the law.

    Everyone has the right to a fair trial.

    Everyone has the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty.

    Everyone has the right to seek justice.

    Everyone has the right to freedom from arbitrary arrest, detention, and exile.

    Everyone has the right to privacy and freedom from attacks on their reputation.

    Everyone has the right to movement.

    Everyone has the right to seek asylum.

    Everyone has the right to a nationality.

    Everyone has the right to marry and have a family, or not to.

    Everyone has the right to own property.

    Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion.

    Everyone has the right to strike, as well as just and favorable conditions at work.

    Everyone has the right to equality between men and women.

    Everyone has the right to choose and accept work.

    Everyone has the right to be treated with humanity in detention.

    Everyone has the freedom from arbitrary expulsion, including non-citizens.

    Everyone has the freedom from child exploitation.

    Everyone has the right to public service and to take part in the government.

    Everyone has the right to social security.

    Everyone has the right to work, equal pay, protection from unemployment, and the right to unionize.

    Everyone has the right to rest and leisure.

    Everyone has the right to freedom of expression and opinion.

    Everyone has the right to peaceful assembly and association.

    Everyone has the right to a decent standard of living, which includes food, clothing, housing, medical care and health, and social services.

    Everyone has the right to education.

    Everyone has the right to undertake scientific and creative research.

    Everyone has the right to culture, art, and science.

    Even though the United States is a member of the United Nations, it’s only agreed and ratified FIVE human rights treaties: the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1994), the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (1994), the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1992), Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2002), and Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution, and Child Pornography (2002). The United States has signed but not fully ratified the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (1977), Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (1980), Convention on the Rights of the Child (1995), and Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2009) – and failed to sign many, many others. This is largely why the United States has a growing list of human rights violations according to the international courts.

    Did you know you can file a human rights violation?

    If you believe any of your international rights as listed above have been violated, you’re entitled to file a formal complaint with the United Nations – regardless of whether you’re just one person, an entire community, or an organization. Filing a complaint is the first step in creating documentation that wrongdoing is taking place – we live in a world filled with bureaucracy, and the United States is one of many countries that would ideally like to erase any history of its wrongdoing. Complaints filed apply if your country is simply a member of the United Nations, regardless of whether they’ve ratified or signed a human rights treaty. As of the time of this article, there are 201 countries around the world – and 193 of them fall under this status as members of the UN.


    Know Your Federal Rights

    Federal laws apply throughout the entire United States, regardless of state or territory – or whichever country you’re living in. In addition to international rights, these laws and rights also apply – but there is no singular list since there are hundreds of laws passed each year. The following is a condensed version of rights guaranteed by the US Constitution and Bill of Rights.

    Everyone has the freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition.

    Everyone has the right to not house soldiers during times of peace.

    Everyone has the right to a fair trial among their peers in both criminal and civil court and cannot be penalized for the same crime twice.

    Everyone has the right to not be a witness against themselves under oath.

    Everyone has the right to a speedy and public trial with an impartial jury.

    Everyone has the right to confront witnesses against themselves in court.

    Everyone has the freedom from excessive bail and fines as well as cruel and unusual punishments.

    Everyone has the right to become the President of the United States, as long as they are native-born United States citizens.

    Everyone has the right to vote, as long as they are a United States citizen, regardless of race, color, gender, or class.

    Everyone has the right to bear firearms and form militias.

    Everyone has the right to property, home, and self and cannot be searched without a warrant or probable cause.

    Everyone has the right to not be deprived of life, liberty, or property without a fair trial.

    Everyone has freedom from property being taken for public use without fair compensation.

    Everyone has the right to be fully informed of alleged crimes held against them.

    Everyone has the right to legal representation and counsel, even if they cannot afford one.

    Everyone has the right to serve as a member of Congress, as long as they are United States citizens.

    Everyone has the freedom from slavery outside of criminal punishment.

    Rights explicitly granted in the United States Constitution have the greatest authority: the Constitution is used to determine whether various laws, ordinances, and orders passed are legal. If a court believes a law goes against the Constitution, that law will be made void. However, amendments (or official revisions/additions) to the Constitution are difficult to make – they require a two-thirds majority vote in Congress and must be ratified by three-fourths of US states. The Constitution has the greatest amount of power, followed by court cases decided by the Supreme Court, then national laws passed in Congress, executive orders through the President’s administration, and finally state and local laws. Given the power of the Constitution, an Equal Rights Amendment has been proposed on and off since 1971 to cement many of the rights given (and taken away) by court cases like Roe v. Wade, Loving v. Virginia, Lawrence v. Texas, and Obergefell v. Hodges.


    Know Your Federal LGBTQIA+ Rights

    ๐Ÿ†SAME SEX ACTIVITY

    Same-sex sexual activity has been federally decriminalized since 2003 when sodomy laws were ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in Lawrence v. Texas. As a result, all anti-sodomy laws in the United States were rendered unenforceable regarding private, consensual settings. Additionally, sodomy laws were removed from the United States military in 2014 through the repeal of “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell.” Other relevant court cases include National Gay Task Force v. Board of Education and United States v. Marcum.

    Newspaper article of The New York Times on the Lawrence v. Texas Supreme Court decision.

    Disclaimer: Lawrence v. Texas was one of the named cases by the US Supreme Court to be revisited and possibly overturned after the overturn of Roe v. Wade. In the event Lawrence v. Texas was overturned, any type of sex not meant for procreation or reproduction would automatically be criminalized in states and territories that did not repeal their sodomy laws before 2003. This includes Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Oklahoma, Kansas, Kentucky, and Texas.

    Although there are no federal laws protecting LGBTQIA+ peopleโ€™s access to equal domestic and sexual violence programs, all US states have included clauses giving equal rights to those programs to unmarried individuals, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity.


    Age of Consent Map

    ๐Ÿ’ƒPERFORMANCE

    There are currently no federal bans or restrictions on drag performance – throughout most of the United States, drag performance is regulated the same as other non-sexual dance and performance arts with specific limitations for when (and if) a drag performance is sexual. At the time of this article, six states have enacted laws to potentially restrict drag performances.

    Arkansas = SB 43 (2023) purposely uses language to potentially restrict drag performance as an “adult” or “sexual” business but does not explicitly ban drag.

    Florida = SB 1438 (2023) purposely uses language to potentially restrict drag performance as an “adult” or “sexual” business. However, SB 1438 has been blocked by federal court since June 2023 as unconstitutional HM Florida-Orlando v. Florida) – but Florida plans to override and appeal this ruling.

    Montana = HB 359 (2023) explicitly restricts drag performance and is used in conjunction with HB 234 (2023) to also restrict other LGBTQIA+ content via obscenity law. However, HB 359 has been blocked by federal court since July 2023 as unconstitutional (Imperial Sovereign Court et al v. Knudsen).

    North Dakota = HB 1333 (2023) purposely uses language to potentially restrict drag performance as an “adult” or “sexual” business.

    Tennessee = SB 3 (2023) and HB 9 (2023) explicitly restricts drag performance. However, SB 3 and HB 9 have been unenforceable since a federal court order in March 2023 and ruling in June 2023 as unconstitutional (Friends of George’s Inc. v. Mulroy) – but Tennessee may still choose to override and appeal this ruling.

    Texas = SB 12 (2023) purposely uses language to potentially restrict drag performance as an “adult” or “sexual” business. However, SB 12 has been blocked through federal court rulings in August 2023 and September 23 as unconstitutional (Woodlands Pride et al v. Colmenero et al, Vortex Repertory Co. et al v. Colmenero et al) – but Texas may still choose to override and appeal this ruling.


    Most material in the United States is evaluated by the “Miller test” from Miller v. California, Smith v. United States (1977) and Pope v. Illinois (1987). Courts use the Miller test to determine whether a material is legally permissible in the United States if

    1. The average person would find the material erotic, lascivious, abnormal, unhealthy, degrading, shameful, or morbid using contemporary adult community standards,
    2. The average person would find the material offensive using contemporary adult community standards,
    3. AND the average person would find the material has zero serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

    Material (sexual or otherwise) can only be banned in the United States if it fulfills all three components of the Miller test – although material can be restricted to ensure it cannot be accessed by minors.

    Other major rights and court cases related to drag bans and performance censorship include One, Inc. v. Olesen and Manual Enterprises, Inc. v. Day, which use the Miller test to permit adult LGBTQIA+ material in the United States.


    ๐Ÿ’QUEER MARRIAGE

    Same-sex, queer, or gay marriage has been federally legalized in the United States since 2015 through the Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges. All states must issue marriage licenses for same-sex couples in the same matter heterosexual couples are issued licenses. Additional court cases on marriage equality include In re Guardianship of Sharon Kowalski, Baehr v. Miike, Baker v. Vermont, Hollingsworth v. Perry, United States v. Windsor, V.L. v. E.L., and Ely v. Saul.

    Jim Obergefell, the named plaintiff in Obergefell v. Hodges, speaking outside of the Supreme Court.
    Jim Obergefell, the named plaintiff in Obergefell v. Hodges, speaking outside of the Supreme Court.

    In 2022, President Joe Biden signed the Respect for Marriage Act into law, giving additional protection to same-sex and interracial marriage in the event that Obergefell v. Hodges or Loving v. Virginia is overturned in the same manner as Roe v. Wade by the Supreme Court. It also repealed the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, which barred same-sex couples from receiving the same marriage benefits heterosexual couples received such as Social Security and tax benefits. However, the majority of states (31 in total) have statutory or constitutional bans on same-sex marriage if the protections of the Respect for Marriage Act and Obergefell v. Hodges were lost.

    Although there are no federal laws protecting LGBTQIA+ peopleโ€™s access to equal domestic and sexual violence programs, all US states have included clauses giving equal rights to those programs to unmarried individuals, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity. Further, the Violence Against Women Act supports all survivors of intimate partner violence, domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking – regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity. VAWA grants access to various violence programs, such as crisis centers, legal aid, education, support groups, hotlines, counseling, housing, etc. VAWA agencies cannot discriminate against LGBTQIA+ people, just as they cannot discriminate against race, national origin, religion, or disability.

    VAWA agencies are open to all men, women, and nonbinary people affected by sexual and domestic violence. Another client complaining about being around a transgender person does not give the program an excuse to discriminate – alternative accommodations can be made, but cannot limit services based on a “heckler’s veto.”


    ๐Ÿ‘ชFAMILY

    Through the ruling of Obergefell v. Hodges and the passage of the Respect for Marriage Act, married same-sex couples have the same benefits and rights granted to heterosexual married couples. Since adoption laws vary drastically by state, there are many different paths available for couples seeking to pursue a family – such as second-parent or co-adoption, stepparent adoption, assisted reproduction, functional parent doctrines, and voluntary acknowledgment of parentage. The only form of adoption and custody protected at the federal level is marital presumption, where a person is assumed as a parent of a child not by biological relationship but because they are married to the biological or legal parent. Relevant cases related to LGBTQIA+ adoption and family issues include Finstuen v. Edmondson, Benitez v. North Coast Women’s Care Medical Group, United States v. Windsor, V.L. v. E.L., Pavan v. Smith, Mize-Gregg v. Pompeo, Kiviti v. Pompeo, Ely v. Saul, and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia. If you think your rights have been violated, get in touch with your ACLU state office.

    The type and amount of information an adoptive family receives from the birth family is regulated at the state level, as are putative father registry laws. The Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 sets federal minimum requirements on adoption procedures, while the Multi-Ethnic Placement Act of 1994 federally prohibits discrimination based on race, color, or national origin and the Indian Child Welfare Act ensures tribal rights and involvement in Native American adoptions. Despite not being a federal law, the Interstate Compact on Placement of Children is a statutory agreement between all US states regarding the transfer and placement of children between states, and all US states have safe haven laws to protect birthmothers the ability to legally and confidentially relinquish newborns in designated locations.

    Nondiscrimination in adoption services based on sexual orientation or gender identity is not protected by the federal government – and while same-sex couples are permitted to adopt in all US states, each state has its own rules regarding discrimination and who is qualified to adopt a child. The majority of adoption agencies deem couples eligible based on their personal standards of what is in the best interest of the child, although Fulton v. City of Philadelphia establishes legal protection against anti-LGBTQIA+ discrimination in government-sanctioned foster care agencies.

    Biological children of US citizens are automatically given United States citizenship, regardless of whether their own citizenship is through birthright or naturalization. This does not necessarily apply to children born abroad from naturalized citizens, although this is currently protected through the court decisions in Mize-Gregg v. Pompeo and Kiviti v. Pompeo.

    Photo of the Kiviti family, post-Kiviti v. Pompeo.


    Transgender individuals are not automatically covered by the same protections as same-sex couples. There are no federal laws that protect custody rights or discrimination in child-related custody. Custody is determined by family law based on the “fitness” of each parent to raise a child during separation, which varies based on the local court deciding over the case. While a parent being transgender has not been shown to cause any harm to a child or their upbringing, transgender status is often discriminated against in court based on “mental or social harm” to the child to take away custody and visitation rights.


    ๐ŸคซCENSORSHIP

    There are no federal restrictions that censor LGBTQIA+ topics, issues, or identities, also known as “Don’t Say Gay” laws. The First Amendment Right to Freedom of Speech grants protection at all levels, including public, private, and professional.

    The recent spike of anti-LGBTQIA+ curriculum laws has created censorship within public schools in certain states such as Alabama, Florida, Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Texas. Montana, Arizona, Arkansas, and Tennessee do not fully censor LGBTQIA+ topics in school but instead require parental notification for an opt-out program of instruction. These laws are largely based on repealed Section 28 of the British Local Government Act 1988 which prohibited material and figures in the government from “intentionally promoting” LGBTQIA+ identities and topics. As of the time of this article, all LGBTQIA+ censorship laws related to minors and education, such as the above “Don’t Say Gay” laws and book bans target schools and libraries that interact with young people. These censorship laws have not gone to federal court, but their legality varies on the court’s distinction between educators’ right to free speech and develop curriculum versus states’ right to mandate censorship.

    Demonstrators protesting the "Don't Say Gay" law passed in Florida.


    The majority of anti-LGBTQIA+ censorship not related to education in the United States is done privately by corporations rather than legislation out of fear of losing business contacts in countries with LGBTQIA+ censorship laws in place, such as China and Russia. The Hays Code, or Motion Picture Production Code, was the main censorship guideline that prevented LGBTQIA+ portrayals in media – however, the Hays Code was not official legislation, but rather guidelines followed by the film industry as a whole until the Hays Code was abandoned in 1968.


    ๐ŸซEDUCATION

    Within United States public schools, LGBTQIA+ students have the federal right to speak openly about their gender identity and sexual orientation under the First Amendment Freedom of Speech and Tinker v. Des Moines (1969). Additionally, LGBTQIA+ students have the federal right to form queer student-led organizations like GSAs (Gay-Straight or Gender-Sexuality Alliances) in public schools that facilitate extracurricular activities via the Equal Access Act of 1984 and Colรญn v. Orange Unified School District (2000) – all students and student organizations must have the same access and opportunities, regardless of sexual orientation, gender identity, or political affiliation. These rights are maintained even in states like Florida, Indiana, and North Carolina where “Don’t Say Gay” laws are in place – while some states are regulating the ability of school staff to discuss LGBTQIA+ issues with students, students have the well-established right to express themselves. The majority of legal issues involving students should be directed at GLSEN, Lambda Legal, or the ACLU.

    In a similar vein, public schools that allow students to wear clothing with written messages or graphics (ex. T-shirts, buttons, hats) must not discriminate based on the message unless it can prove the message is verbally abusive, promotes illegal drug use, is especially lewd or profane, or will cause genuine and substantial disruption to teaching. As supported by the 2012 decision in Couch v. Wayne Local School District, schools are not allowed to censor or ban students’ materials because they include an LGBTQIA+ theme unless they ban all clothing and materials that contain messages entirely.

    The federal courts have set a high bar for what schools are allowed to censor as “disruptive,” and the burden of proof falls on the school to prove. While LGBTQIA+ topics might be controversial, Hatcher v. DeSoto County Board of Education (2013) proved controversial topics are not disruptive enough to warrant censorship. The threats and harassment by other students, parents, or teachers also do not qualify for the federal standard for censorship within public schools and schools are not allowed to veto a student-led LGBTQIA+ organization on that basis, as determined by Nabozny v. Podlesny (1996), Flores v. Morgan Hill Unified School District (2003), and Romer v. Evans (1996). Instead, these court decisions set the federal regulation that public schools are required to intervene and take disciplinary action against the harasser since “there is no constitutional right to be a bully” and there is no “heckler’s veto” regarding the law. Like non-LGBTQIA+ students, queer students have the same right to report harassment and bullying as well as for their schools to intervene on their behalf.

    United States public schools are not legally allowed to enforce gender-based dress codes based on biological or assumed sex – while schools are allowed to require dress codes, public schools are required by federal law to allow students to choose any of the dress options available despite associated gender roles through Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. File a Title IX violation here.

    LGBTQIA+ students hold the same rights to attend school functions (such as school dances, field trips, athletic games, etc.) as their cisgender heterosexual counterparts, per the federal case Fricke v. Lynch (1980) through the understanding of same-sex relationships as a type of free speech. As mentioned above, schools are additionally required to intervene in the event of harassment by other students, parents, or teachers – abusive, violent, and intolerant speech is not covered within the free speech given to public schools, and schools have the responsibility to intervene. Further, public schools are barred from punishing LGBTQIA+ students and relationships more heavily than cisgender heterosexual ones on behaviors such as public displays of affection.

    “To rule otherwise [in Fricke v. Lynch] would completely subvert free speech in the schools by granting other students a ‘heckler’s veto,’ allowing them to decide through prohibited and violent methods what speech will be heard. The first amendment does not tolerate mob rule by unruly school children… the school does have an obligation to take reasonable measures to protect and foster free speech, not to stand helpless before unauthorized student violence.”

    – “Fricke v. Lynch, 491 F. Supp. 381,” by Chief Judge Pettine

    The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act requires public schools to keep personal identifying information about students private – including sexual orientation and gender identity. School staff are not allowed to share students’ medical histories or information with other students, teachers, parents, etc., and doing so is seen as putting the student in potential danger and outing them. However, parents and legal guardians have the additional right to access and view school records of their minors until the end of high school – which is why some US states have enacted laws requiring school staff to out LGBTQIA+ students to their parents or guardians, even if they are not legally allowed to share that information elsewhere.

    It is up to each state’s discretion whether to require school staff to use chosen names and pronouns of transgender and nonbinary students, or ban such use and require staff to use legal names and pronouns as correlated based on their sex assigned at birth. There are no federal laws or court cases that protect transgender students in this way, although there may be executive orders depending on the presidential administration. Legal names and medical information only have to be used on a select few documents and are not required for the vast majority of items. While it is best practice to use the chosen name, title, and pronouns on transgender students’ paperwork, emails, uniforms, and other identifying information, the United States currently has no binding requirements to mandate their use on the federal level. While most consider purposely misgendering or deadnaming transgender students as harassment and discrimination, this has not been specifically coded into any laws or federal cases. Most public schools use outdated systems that make updating student information to reflect chosen identities difficult, but a task being complicated does not warrant denying a student’s rights.

    Map on US states that force school staff to out transgender students.

    While many states have explicit laws regarding bullying and harassment of LGBTQIA+ students, all American public school students are protected from bullying on the basis of their sexual orientation or gender identity through Fricke v. Lynch, Nabozny v. Podlesny, Colรญn v. Orange Unified School District, Henkle v. Gregory, and Flores v. Morgan Hill Unified School District. Public schools have a legal duty to intervene when witnessing any form of bullying, harassment, and other forms of discrimination – including anti-LGBTQIA+ bullying. Failure to do so has been well-established as negligence to student safety, regardless of whether the harassment occurred during school hours, on a field trip, the bus ride from school, afterschool functions, or official online spaces.

    Transgender students have the right to use the restroom at school that best aligns with their chosen gender identity, and cannot be forced to use the restroom based on their sex assigned at birth – the federal case Whitaker v. Kenosha Unified School District established this right for both gender-segregated restrooms and locker rooms. Additionally, transgender students are protected under the Equal Access Act and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. Despite this, several states have banned transgender people from using the restroom consistent with their gender identity in school spaces, including K-12 schools, colleges, and government buildings – although these bans have not been judged for their constitutionality in the Supreme Court. Additionally, each state has varying laws on whether transgender students must “prove” their ability to use the restroom or locker room of their choice – which may include medical diagnoses or transition-related care. Gender-affirming medical care such as hormone replacement therapy and puberty blockers are not legal in all US states and are the primary focus of the 2025 Supreme Court case United States v. Skrmetti. Under the Equal Access Act, all gender-neutral restrooms must be of the same standard as gender-segregated restrooms – best practices guide schools include allowing transgender and nonbinary students to choose to use gender-neutral restrooms rather than requiring them, although this is not encoded into any laws or court cases.

    On January 29th, 2025, President Donald Trump signed the executive order “Ending Radical Indoctrination in K-12 Schooling.” This order goes directly against many of the established protections, laws, and court rulings that an executive order alone cannot overrule. Like most of Trump’s executive orders, it will be contested in order as states sue the administration’s overreach on state governance.

    Trump’s executive order attempts to force a federal “Don’t Say Gay” rule into all American public schools since his administration deems LGBTQIA+ identities as radical indoctrination. The order also outlaws all inclusive training that support diverse students and punish school staff that support students’ social (non-medical) transition by using their chosen name and pronouns. All executive orders take time to be fully implemented, and nearly all of the administration’s orders are unenforceable and will be changed in some way during the lawsuit process.

    Map that shows US states that have bathroom and locker room laws barring transgender and nonbinary students.

    As mentioned under Censorship, some states have laws that outlaw LGBTQIA+ topics within public schools – also known as “Don’t Say Gay” or “No Promo Homo” laws. While most of these laws have tried to ban LGBTQIA+ educators and Gay-Straight/Gender-Sexuality Alliances, they have only been able to restrict LGBTQIA+ topics from being officially discussed in class – sexual orientation and gender identity are protected within Employment below and GSAs are covered within students’ right to free speech and assembly. Other states, such as Illinois, have curriculum mandates that require public schools to teach inclusive history and sex education in public schools at the same time “Don’t Say Gay” states increasingly ban books that contain LGBTQIA+ themes, characters or color, or other controversial topics. While these laws have not been taken to the Supreme Court, LGBTQIA+ students should have the right to inclusive education and materials under the Equal Access Act, since LGBTQIA+ resources and online materials like campuspride.org, glsen.org, or gsanetwork.org should not be banned on school internet or devices unless non-LGBTQIA+ resources are similarly regulated.

    Map that shows US states that ban classroom discussions of LGBTQIA+ topics, issues, and identities through "Don't Say Gay" and "No Promo Homo" laws.

    ๐Ÿ‘”EMPLOYMENT

    After the Supreme Court decisions in 2020 over Bostock v. Clayton County, R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Altitude Express, Inc. v. Zarda, and Hively v. Ivy Tech Community College, sexual orientation and gender identity became protected classes from employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This protects LGBTQIA+ people from discrimination during hiring, firing, promotions, training, work assignments, pay, benefits, discipline, and other terms of employment regardless of employer type (ex. private, public, government, etc.) as long as the employer has at least 15 employees. File a Title VII violation here.

    Due to the decision in Bostock, sex-based harassment under the Civil Rights Act includes anti-transgender remarks, jokes, and derogatory comments. Invasive personal questions as well as repeated and/or intentional use of the wrong name and pronouns also fall under the federal protections of the Civil Rights Act. Employers are not allowed to disclose your LGBTQIA+ status without your consent, and cannot prevent you from being out.

    While the United States does not have any federal protections or legislation for LGBTQIA+ people beyond those Supreme Court cases, the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission currently bans sex-related discrimination related to sexual orientation or gender identity – however, like all federal agencies, this policy can be revoked relatively easily depending on the presidential administration similar to the number of executive orders currently protecting LGBTQIA+ employment.

    Upon Donald Trump’s return to office, all federal agencies were ordered to implement transgender bathroom bans at government buildings in January 2025. This is not an executive order – while it will negatively affect transgender people accessing care, it has no role in the employment protections currently covered by Bostock.


    โœ๏ธRELIGIOUS EXEMPTION

    Laws that permit people, churches, nonprofit organizations, and corporations to use religious belief to exclude LGBTQIA+ people regardless of existing laws are called religious exemption laws, which have become more popular over the past three decades through the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. Through religious exemption, businesses and organizations deny reproductive healthcare, marriage, public business, and employee benefits. The Religious Freedom Restoration Act, as well as the decision in 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, and Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Group of Boston, give federal religious exemption to private businesses and organizations – including the use of “No Gays Allowed” public signage. However, government-sanctioned organizations are not entitled to claim religious exemption, as decided in Benitez v. North Coast Women’s Care Medical Group.

    Sign that states "No Gays Allowed," legally allowed by religious exemption.


    Outside of this use, religious exemption laws protect minority religions from discrimination – such as allowing Muslims or Sikhs to maintain grooming habits in US prisons. The foundation of religious exemption is to protect marginalized groups who practice faiths other than dominant Christianity, although religious exemption laws have been extremely warped in the United States to give excess power to Christians.


    ๐Ÿ˜๏ธHOUSING

    While there are no explicit laws regarding LGBTQIA+ people, sexual orientation and gender identity have been well-understood as included in housing anti-discrimination guidelines. The US Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity bans discrimination against LGBTQIA+ people and protect queer and transgender people from unfair evictions and denials of housing. If you believe you have experienced housing discrimination, you can file a report with the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

    The Department uses the same understanding that sex-based discrimination protections include sexual orientation and gender identity as Supreme Court cases over Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Fair Housing Act has prohibited discrimination in federally-assisted housing since 2012 and has included gender identity and sexual orientation since Bostock v. Clayton County, while Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 109 of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, Age Discrimination Act of 1975, and Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 prohibit discrimination in both private and public housing.

    Federal discrimination law also applies to residential service programs and temporary shelters. Homeless shelters cannot refuse to admit someone because they are LGBTQIA+, and cannot deny services and programs offered to cisgender heterosexual members.

    LGBTQIA+ individuals are also protected from discrimination in credit and lending, as sexual orientation and gender identity are protected under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. These protections give queer and transgender people protection in opening bank accounts, taking loans, and using other credit services. Discrimination reports should be filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

    In Braschi v. Stahl Associates Co. (1989), same-sex couples were given housing and rent control protection as “family” or “household” units under housing law, regardless of marriage status.


    ๐Ÿช–MILITARY

    Queer people have been allowed to openly serve in the United States armed forces since the repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell in 2011. Additionally, queer individuals have been granted equal access to military services and veterans benefits since the official pardon of anti-LGBTQIA+ dishonorable charges by President Biden in October 2024. Queer active members and veterans in need of assistance or support should contact Military OneSource.

    A crowd celebrating the overturn of Don't Ask Don't Tell, allowing LGBTQIA+ people to openly serve in the US military.


    Transgender individuals have been allowed to serve in the United States military since 2021 after the repeal of the Trump administration ban in 2017 – although this ban is expected to go back into effect when Trump returns to office. The services and veterans benefits transgender members can get vary – although they should be granted equal access to both the military and their benefits for serving, the Trump ban(s) places them under dishonorable discharge and therefore ineligible for veteran status. Additionally, the services given to transgender service members are unequal, since the Veterans Administration has issued its final ruling that gender-affirming care is not covered as of February 2024.

    Everyone assigned male at birth, including transgender women, is required to register with the national military conscription service known as the Selective Service within 30 days of turning 18. Failure to do so can result in up to five years in prison and $250,000 in fines. People assigned female at birth, including transgender men, are not required to register with the Service – although they may opt-in due to the federal ruling in National Coalition for Men v. Selective Service System. However, transgender men who do not register with the Selective Service will have difficulty using government services and programs such as Medicaid, SNAP, and college assistance and will be required to obtain a Status Information Letter to receive government benefits. In the event the draft is resumed, any/all transgender people may file a claim for exemption from military service if they receive an order to report for examination.

    On January 27th, 2025, President Donald Trump signed the executive order “Prioritizing Military Excellence and Readiness.” This order reinstated the transgender ban in all branches of the United States armed forces since transgender identity was deemed incompatible with the Trump administration’s perception of honorable military conduct. It is currently unclear if the discharges associated with this order will be dishonorable. In the event that a draft is enforced by the United States, transgender individuals are permitted to dodge service through their gender identity status.



    ๐Ÿ’”CONVERSION THERAPY

    The pseudoscientific practice of attempting to change someone’s sexual orientation or gender identity is known as conversion therapy. There are no federal laws regarding conversion therapy, although there have been multiple attempts to both enforce and ban conversion therapy.

    Over half of US states and territories have at least partial bans on conversion therapy’s use on minors – as well as more than 100 cities with additional laws protecting young people from the harmful effects of conversion therapy. Only one district, Washington D.C., bans conversion therapy entirely for both minors and adults.

    Conversion therapy laws only affect licensed practitioners, not unlicensed or religion-based providers – although some states have additional protections against unlicensed and religious practitioners.

    Map that shows US states that allow conversion therapy on minors.

    ๐Ÿค•HATE CRIME PROTECTION

    Also known as bias crime laws, hate crime laws prohibit and prosecute crimes based on opposition/hostility against a protected class such as race, color, religion, or national origin. In 2009, sexual orientation and gender identity were added to federal hate crime law under the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act. Brandon v. Richardson County also established that law enforcement officers have a legal responsibility to protect LGBTQIA+ people when reporting hate crimes. Wisconsin v. Mitchell ruled that increased penalties on hate-based crimes are constitutional – which became federal law in 1994 with the passage of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act.

    The law makes a distinction between hate speech and speech that is broadly protected under the First Amendment. Most hateful speech is generally protected under the First Amendment, it becomes illegal and prosecutable if it can be proven to incite violence, hostility, or discrimination based on race, religion, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability. Unless it is proven as such, hate speech cannot be lawfully censored, punished, or unduly burdened by the government. The limitations and protections of hateful speech were a primary focus in Snyder v. Phelps, establishing the limits of non-violent hate speech in private and public settings.

    The Hate Crime Statistics Act of 1990 and Campus Hate Crimes Right to Know Act of 1997 mandate the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation to collect, maintain, and publish hate crime statistics to the general public.

    Gay panic dense, trans panic defense, and homosexual advance defense is a victim-blaming legal defense strategy where a person claims to commit a violent crime against an LGBTQIA+ person because they allegedly made an unwanted sexual advance on them. The defense holds that the defendant was so offended or frightened that they were forced into attacking violently. The related trans panic defense is most often employed by cisgender heterosexuals who reacted violently upon learning their lover is transgender. There are no national bans on gay and trans panic defense, and the legal defense strategy can be employed in the majority of states that have not enacted their own ban.

    Map that shows US states that have banned gay and transgender panic defenses.

    SmithKline Beecham v. Abbott Laboratories ruled that jurors cannot be removed from a case due to their sexual orientation or gender identity, giving LGBTQIA+ Americans federal protection from jury discrimination.


    ๐ŸŸฅHIV/AIDS

    There is no federal criminalization of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), although many states have laws criminalizing HIV and its potential transmission due to the 1990 requirement in the Ryan White CARE Act that forced states to place criminal regulations on HIV to remain eligible for federal funding. Several efforts have been made to repeal all state criminalization laws, but they have all died in Congress despite overwhelming evidence since 1990 that HIV criminalization is ineffective in reducing transmission. At the time of this article, there have been no federal or Supreme Court cases that have brought the constitutionality of HIV criminalization to court – the closest was Rhoades v. Iowa in 2014, which was settled by the state-level Iowa Supreme Court.

    Approximately half of US states have HIV criminalization laws, which penalize people living with HIV if they “potentially expose” other people to the virus. Even though HIV criminalization has been proven ineffective and disproportionally targets marginalized people, these laws range from misdemeanors to felonies attached to lifelong sex offender registry.

    HIV criminalization laws


    HIV and AIDS are considered a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act, giving federal protection from all aspects of disability-related discrimination to anyone living with HIV/AIDS, as well as protections under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act. These protections cover employment, housing, and other aspects of living. United States employers are only allowed to ask potential employees if they are capable of performing tasks associated with the job, such as lifting heavy boxes, and cannot legally ask any applicant if they have a disability or medical condition. It is the employee’s right to (and if) tell an employer that they are living with HIV, such as to get workplace accommodations. Employers can only refuse to hire someone due to their HIV status if they can objectively prove they would be a direct threat to others during routine job duties, which usually only applies to healthcare. Lastly, employers must keep medical and disability information confidential – they are not allowed to tell other staff or employers about your HIV status. These protections are further ingrained through the decisions in Taylor v. Rice and Matter of Matthew Cusick and Cirque du Soleil.

    The Americans with Disabilities Act makes anti-HIV discrimination in healthcare settings illegal. Medical providers are expected and required to use universal precautions on every patient they treat, so there are no additional or special protective procedures required to work on patients living with HIV. Depending on the state, a healthcare provider could argue religious exemption to refuse to treat a patient living with HIV based on the assumed sexual orientation or gender identity of the patient, but only if their practice does not use any government funding – people living with HIV are protected due to their disability status in hospitals, clinics, social service agencies, drug treatment centers, nursing homes, doctors’ offices, dentists’ offices, daycares, public pools, and fitness gyms. Healthcare insurance companies, Medicaid, and employers cannot discriminate because of HIV status and must provide the same standard of care as given to other employees, although this protection does not apply to people who obtain healthcare insurance without an employer.

    The Fair Housing Act also covers the right to health and safety at home, and landlords cannot discriminate against people living with HIV. According to federal law, landlords must make reasonable accommodations as deemed medically necessary for tenants with HIV.


    ๐Ÿ‘ฎPRISON

    Compared to the rest of the public, those held in government custody such as in prison or jail have the least amount of rights. Even rights such as protection from enslavement are not guaranteed to United States prisons, due to the intentional language in the Thirteenth Amendment: “Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.”

    While incarcerated individuals have a variety of rights listed below, the only rights maintained within the US Constitution are First Amendment rights. Prison officials are entitled to open non-privileged mail directed to inmates without probable cause or a warrant to preserve order, discipline, and security – although they are not permitted to censor portions they find merely controversial or rude, as decided in Thornburgh v. Abbot. Other than nudity, prisoners have the right to receive books, magazines, newspapers, and other mail as long as it does not affect prison safety. Prison officials cannot bar friends and relatives from buying you books or magazine subscriptions, and both you and the sender have the right to be notified if your mail will be censored or rejected. Mail cannot be censored because it is critical of the prison or its officials (Procunier v. Martinez), and prisons cannot ban mail simply because it contains material downloaded from the internet.

    In the majority of the United States, inmates are not allowed to vote. The only districts where incarcerated individuals maintain their right to vote from jail or prison are Washington D.C., Vermont, and Maine. Most states reinstate voting rights after release, although felony convictions can further restrict individuals’ right to vote after completing their sentence. 10 states permanently strike voting rights from convicted felons in select cases.

    Inmates are protected under the Due Process Clause of the Constitution from unauthorized and intentional deprivation of their personal belongings but are not given reasonable privacy and are liable to be searched at any time by prison officials. Strip searches must not be done in full view of other prisoners, and searches should only use staff of the same gender identity as the inmate unless there is an emergency. Federal laws protect the religious rights of prisoners, and prison officials must give objective proof that giving religious accommodation is dangerous to deny it. Officers cannot impose religious beliefs and cannot give special preference based on religion.

    Both those detained pre-trial and convicted people incarcerated must be housed in humane facilities, and maintain the right to be free of “cruel or unusual punishment” through the Eighth Amendment. Before conviction, detainees must be treated as innocent while awaiting trial and cannot be “punished.” The limitations of what counts as cruel or unusual punishment are based on court discretion and are not in any explicit guidelines. Many correctional facilities place LGBTQIA+ in solidarity confinement to protect them from violence – however, inmates cannot be placed into solidarity against their will for more than 30 days, and inmates in protective solidarity must still have access to programs, privileges, education, and work opportunities to the fullest extent possible.

    Incarcerated individuals are protected from sexual crimes and harassment under the Prison Rape Elimination Act. This also includes LGBTQIA+ inmates, and sexual orientation and gender identity have been classified as reasons to give inmates additional protection under the Prison Rape Elimination Act since the Supreme Court ruling in Farmer v. Brennan. The Eighth Amendment gives prison officials the legal obligation to protect prisoners from physical and sexual assault, including from other prisoners and prison officials. As elaborated in Farmer, officials aware of possible assault can be found violating the Eighth Amendment if they fail to take action. While prison officials are allowed to use force, they are not permitted to use force to cause harm – officers are only authorized to use force to maintain prison order. Additionally, the Prison Rape Elimination Act requires all prisons and jails to make individualized housing placements for all transgender and intersex inmates, including when assigning them to male or female facilities, and all inmates have the right to request a private shower according to the PREA.

    Inmates cannot be racially segregated in prison except in objective circumstances for preserving prison security.

    Being in prison does not take away your right to file official complaints and reports. Inmates maintain their right to report prison conditions and have access to court systems. The Prison Litigation Reform Act allows inmates to file lawsuits in federal court, although they must pay their own court filing fees and can be dismissed if the courts find their lawsuit to be “frivolous,” “malicious,” or false.

    Disabled inmates hold their rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and prisons must allow equal access to programs and facilities to qualified inmates. You have the right to have reasonable modifications to policies and procedures, and you are entitled to auxiliary aids and services like sign language interpreters, captioning, videophones, readers, Braille, and audio recordings. Prison officials are only allowed to deny accommodations if they can prove it would create immense an financial burden to the program or would create a safety risk that cannot be mitigated.

    All incarcerated people have the right to appropriate and adequate mental healthcare and are further given the right to a hearing if they are to be moved to a mental health facility. However, federal law does not protect inmates from being forced to take anti-psychotic drugs before a hearing.

    Lastly, inmates are entitled to adequate medical care to treat both short-term and long-term conditions. Prison and jail staff must evaluate transgender detainees for gender dysphoria within a reasonable timeframe, and diagnoses and treatments for gender dysphoria must be delivered according to accepted medical standards. Prisons are not allowed to instate general bans on types of treatments, such as hormone replacement therapy or gender confirmation surgery. Inmates also must have access to abortions as well as prenatal, pregnancy, and postpartum care – and cannot be forced to pay before receiving necessary medical care. Those in incarceration also have the right to refuse sterilization or other unwanted birth control.

    The Transgender Offender Manual contains the most up-to-date policies regarding transgender inmates, created by the US Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Prisons. However, the TOM is subject to change depending on the presidential administration, so many of the following policies and rights may change as Trump resumes office. The TOM requires transgender inmates to be assigned an associate warden to ensure they have access to services and programs, similar to case management, and prisons that house transgender prisoners should have additional training required among staff. As of the time of this article, incarcerated transgender individuals are housed on a case-by-case basis to best ensure the inmate’s health and safety rather than biological sex assignment or surgery status. Prison officials are strictly prohibited from deliberately or repeatedly misgendering transgender inmates, and transgender prisoners must be allowed to choose the undergarments and accommodations best aligned with their gender identity.

    Upon his first day back in office, President Donald Trump signed the executive order “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government” on January 20th, 2025. The order attempts to force transgender people to be housed in prisons based on their sex assigned at birth and ban any form of gender-affirming care like hormone replacement therapy from being offered to them. However, this order has already been blocked and requires more details regarding its legality.



    ๐ŸฉธBLOOD DONATIONS

    Under the policy of the United States Food and Drug Administration and American Red Cross, anyone who has not had anal sex with any new or multiple partners in the past three months is allowed to donate blood. Additionally, potential blood donors must not be taking any anti-HIV prevention medication such as PrEP or PEP, and must not have ever tested positive for HIV. If the donor meets these guidelines, they may donate blood, tissue, and organs regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity.

    Before 2023, the United States had strict limitations that barred LGBTQIA+ people from donating since the policies targeted individuals based on sexual orientation. In 2023, the FDA removed its sexual orientation-based restriction and instead uses a standardized questionnaire to approve or deny potential donors based on the latest research of HIV transmission risk. However, the current policy from the FDA and American Red Cross still discriminates against polyamorous individuals and makes no distinction between casual hook-ups and committed, exclusive relationships with multiple partners.

    At this time, individuals who have ever had HIV or AIDS are ineligible to donate blood, even if their viral load is undetectable or untransmittable.


    ๐Ÿ“œGENDER DOCUMENTS

    Transgender rights, such as the right to legal name and gender marker updates or gender-affirming care, are determined at the state level. There are no federal laws or guidelines related to the legal documents of transgender people in the United States. National documents, such as passports and Social Security cards, reflect the information used on state identification such as birth certificates and driver’s licenses.

    For information on how to change your legal name or gender marker on court orders, birth certificates, or driver’s licenses, visit Advocates for Trans Equality’s Document Center. Their “Name Change, Driver’s License, & Birth Certificates” section gives detailed steps needed in all US states and territories.

    Name Changes
    To change your legal name, you must file paperwork with your local court and appear before a judge. Unless you are filing for a name change due to marriage or divorce, your request will be categorized as a “court order name change.” After submitting your paperwork and paying your filing fee, you’ll be given a court date where you will explain your request to a judge – there are lots of reasons people change their legal names, so there aren’t as many limitations.

    Half of US states require you to publish your upcoming name change in a local newspaper or related organization. These publication laws are meant to give notice to debt collection agencies and create a paper trail regarding your identity. Also, about half of the United States has additional barriers for individuals with criminal records.

    To change your name on any of the other legal documents below, you must have a signed copy of your court order name change. Without it, you will be unable to change the legal name on your other identification items.

    Birth Certificates
    25 states, plus Washington D.C. and Puerto Rico, issue updated birth certificates with the gender marker aligned with your gender identity without medical requirements. You can only get a birth certificate update from the state where you were born, unlike driver licenses and state IDs. 16 states have written or unclear policies that require transgender people to have a gender affirmation surgery to update their birth certificate’s gender marker – although the “gender affirmation surgery” varies on state and can refer to any medical treatment such as hormone replacement therapy or bottom surgery. Consular Records of Birth Abroad for American citizens born outside of the United States uses self-attestation to update gender markers in the same process as passports are updated.

    Washington, Oregon, California, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, New Mexico, Illinois, Michigan, Maine, Vermont, New York, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New Jersey, and Washington D.C. allow residents to use M, F, or X on their birth certificates.

    Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, Florida, Tennessee, Montana, and North Dakota fully ban transgender people from updating their birth certificates.

    Driver License/State IDs
    21 states, plus Washington D.C., issue updated driver licenses with the gender marker aligned with your gender identity without provider certification. The rest of US states and territories require provider certification – a process where a certified professional signs off on your transition and progress via a letter to be shown when updating your license. You can only get an updated driver’s license or state ID in the state you currently reside in, unlike birth certificates.

    In addition to Washington D.C., 22 states allow residents to use M, F, or X on their driver’s licenses.

    Texas, Florida, Kansas, and Tennessee fully ban transgender people from updating their driver’s licenses.



    Social Security Card
    While Social Security cards only show a name and do not physically show any gender marker associated with their owner, it has gender data that needs to be updated alongside other documents. Your updated court order name change, birth certificate, and/or driver’s license/state ID will be used to update this form. If available in your state, X gender markers can be used on federal documents.

    Updating your gender associated with your Social Security card is easy – it’s based on self-attestation, where you confirm that you are changing your card to match your gender identity.

    Legal name updates to Social Security has a longer process, where your updated forms above are used to update your Social Security card. If applicable, your name and gender information on Medicare will also be updated when your Social Security is updated.

    Additionally, the IRS will be automatically updated on your gender marker and/or legal name change when you update Social Security. Your next tax filing will use your new name and gender marker. To avoid issues, make sure your employer updates your W2 and payroll information to eliminate potential discrepancies.

    Voter Registration
    Your voter registration must match your legal name as associated with your state ID or driver’s license. As such, your ability to update your legal name or gender marker will depend on whether your state allows updates to either your birth certificate or driver’s license.

    While not all states require ID to vote, your name information must match the records on file for your vote to be cast. Your gender identity and presentation do not need to match your name, photo, or gender marker listed on your ID. Updates to voter registration can almost always be completed online, and can often be done while also updating your driver’s license or state ID.

    Healthcare & Benefit Programs
    The rules for updating your legal name and gender marker on state benefit programs like EBT/SNAP and Medicaid vary by state – like Social Security, there is an associated gender marker attached to your information even if one is not printed on your forms and ID.

    You will also need to update healthcare insurance and Medicaid as needed. It is important to note that your insurance company and Medicaid base your eligibility to receive covered healthcare services as the gender marker associated with your account. Due to this reason, many transgender people update their name with healthcare insurance and Medicaid, but not their gender marker so that they can continue receiving care needed based on their sex assigned at birth (ex. hormone replacement therapy, cancer screenings). Healthcare insurance plans are not supposed to ban coverage based on sex, but that does not mean discrepancies will not affect your potential care.

    Bank Accounts & Lending
    You will need to update all bank accounts and credit agencies of your legal name change using your court order name change. Failing to do so quickly may affect your credit score or payment methods. Since these updates largely use only your name and not gender marker, they are easier to complete.

    While updating your financials, you should also update loans and agreements – as well as estate plans, trusts, wills, power of attorney, and advance directives.

    Passport
    Changes to your national passport require a certified copy of your court order name change as well as a passport photo and your most recent passport. Like Social Security, gender markers are updated based on self-attestation and give you the option to select M, F, or X to best reflect your gender identity. You do not need a birth certificate or state ID to update your gender marker, making passports the easiest to update to reflect your identity – although this is subject to agency discretion and the presidential administration.

    President Donald Trump signed “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government” on January 20th, 2025. This executive order rescinded all gender-affirming updates regarding passports (although it does not include other federal documents like social security) and bans the use of “X” gender markers, requiring the use of one’s “God-given sex” on identity documents. However, this order has been difficult to enforce beyond excluding X markers – passport offices across the country are currently overwhelmed while they create new processes.


    Selective Service
    As mentioned under Military, all people assigned male at birth are required to register with the national military conscription service known as Selective Service within 30 days of turning 18. People assigned female at birth can opt-in for Selective Service but are not required to register – although transgender men may encounter barriers and difficulty using government programs without registering with the Service.

    You are required to update the Selective Service of any legal name changes until your 26th birthday, which is done with the Change of Information Form (SSS Form 2) at any United States Post Office or Embassy. Updates to gender markers are inapplicable since the Selective Service only uses the gender you were assigned at birth and does not update gender information.

    Immigration Documents
    For any immigration document, you will need your court order name change to update your legal name. To update your gender marker, you can either use a driver’s license, birth certificate, passport, court order, or other government-issued document or get a provider certification letter from a licensed professional. Some immigration documents may allow you to bypass the provider certification and instead use self-attestation, while others may documents such as certificates of naturalization or certificates of citizenship require certification.


    ๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€โšง๏ธGENDER-AFFIRMING CARE

    Roughly half of the United States requires gender-affirming care as a prerequisite to updating legal forms such as birth certificates or driver’s licenses. Gender-affirming care refers to a range of medical treatments, such as hormone replacement therapy, puberty blockers, top surgery, bottom surgery, etc. Like Gender Documents, gender-affirming care is determined on the state level and there are currently no national restrictions or protections on it.

    24 states ban gender-affirming care such as hormone replacement therapy and puberty blockers for minors under the age of 18, regardless of medical diagnosis or parental permission. However, the constitutionality of these laws will be determined by the ruling in United States v. Skrmetti. Even though these laws target minors, they often affect transgender adults as well – Missouri attempted to ban gender-affirming care for anyone with a mental health diagnosis, even though a mental health diagnosis was required as a prerequisite to have gender-affirming care. Elsewhere, transgender adults are affected by the mass wave of medical providers leaving anti-transgender states to continue their practice in sanctuary states.

    On the opposite side of the political spectrum, 14 states and Washington D.C. have “shield laws” that give sanctuary status to anyone seeking gender-affirming care or abortion services. In response, some states have attempted to criminalize transit between states for care – although this is directly in violation of the US Constitution and Americans’ right to travel freely between states.

    While employers are not allowed to discriminate based on gender identity or sexual orientation and are required to offer all their employees healthcare insurance, not all healthcare insurance companies cover gender-affirming care. 24 states and D.C. require transgender-related services to be covered by healthcare insurance plans and Medicaid, while the rest of the country has no requirement to include gender-affirming care. Health plans are not allowed to have blanket exclusions or limits on trans-related care. Medicare fully covers medically necessary care, veteran programs cover some, and the coverage provided by Medicaid is determined by each state. At the time of this article, Arkansas and Mississippi are the only US states to ban insurance companies from covering gender-affirming care entirely – which will have to be tested in court for constitutionality. For those living in areas without healthcare insurance coverage, IRS Publication 502 allows medical expenses to become tax-deductible if they are not paid by any insurance or third party, including gender transition services.

    The majority of healthcare providers are not allowed to discriminate or claim a religious exemption in treating LGBTQIA+ people due to the high likelihood that their practice or hospital takes some sort of government funding. Due to this, providers are not allowed to refuse treatment, force unnecessary examinations, refuse access to gender-segregated restrooms, refuse counseling or referrals, isolate you, require conversion therapy, or generally harass you due to your sexual orientation or gender identity.

    Like all LGBTQIA+ rights, transgender healthcare is a direct target for the Trump administration upon his resumption of office. During his 2024 presidential campaign, Trump promised to sign an executive order banning gender transition at any age through federal agencies, including Medicaid.

    On January 28th, 2025, President Donald Trump signed the executive order โ€œProtecting Children from Chemical and Surgical Mutilation.โ€ While executive orders often carry the power of federal law, they do not override the US Constitution, federal statutes and laws, or established legal precedent โ€“ nor do they have the longevity of passed laws. The order bans gender-affirming care being covered by state Medicaid programs for anyone under the age of 19, including puberty blockers and hormone replacement therapy.



    ๐ŸšฝBATHROOMS & PUBLIC SPACES

    Bathroom bills are the common term used about anti-transgender legislation that criminalizes transgender people who use the restroom as their gender identity rather than the sex assigned at birth. Bathroom bills fall under public accommodation, meaning these laws apply to any group, business, organization, or building that serves the public regardless of whether they are publicly or privately funded. Currently, public accommodations must adhere to the federal guidelines under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act and Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 – but since the Civil Rights Act does not list gender identity as a protected category, bathroom bills seek to target the vulnerability of the law until their constitutionality is tested in court.

    REFUGE is a free online directory of safe restrooms for transgender, intersex, and gender-nonconforming people available on desktop, Android, and Apple devices. It’s a great community resource that uses personal submissions to create a network of safety.


    There are 14 states that have bathroom bills in place – the overwhelming majority of these states force transgender people to use the restroom as their sex assigned at birth regardless of transition status or expression at K-12 schools and result in up to six months of jail time and $500 to $1,000 in fines. These bathroom bills do not affect restrooms not within K-12 schools or the majority of public life – and as mentioned in Education, transgender and nonbinary students have the federal right to use the restroom as their aligned gender identity per Whitaker v. Kenosha Unified School District, but these school bathroom bills have not been successfully taken to court.

    Out of those 14 states, North Dakota, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Ohio also ban transgender people from using the restroom in some government-owned buildings, such as colleges and universities. These more aggressive anti-transgender laws have gained over the past year and have also not been tested for constitutionality.

    At the time of this article, two states make it a criminal offense to use the restroom other than as the sex you were assigned at birth.

    • Florida’s HB 1521 and SB 1674 allow for residents of Florida to report “non-compliance” by transgender people to the state government. Those convicted fact a second-degree misdemeanor charge, 60 days in jail, and fines up to $500 per offense. The Facility Requirements Based on Sex Act bars transgender people in approximately 20% of private establishments, over 50% of public facilities, and 60% of state-licensed facilities – including K-12 schools, colleges, universities, correctional institutions, domestic violence shelters, healthcare facilities, homeless shelters, state government buildings, assisted living facilities, massage establishments, optical and vision centers, pain management clinics, pharmacies, and substance abuse treatment facilities. The Act makes an explicit exception for intersex people receiving prescribed gender-affirming care from a doctor, and unlike other bathroom bills, makes zero exceptions for transgender people who have had gender affirmation surgery or updated their birth certificate. There are currently three active lawsuits that are challenging the Act’s legality: Doe v. Florida, Smith v. Orange County Public Schools, and ACLU v. Florida.
    • Utah enacted HB 257, also known as Sex-Based Designations for Privacy, Anti-Bullying, and Women’s Opportunities. Like Florida, everyday citizens and officials have a confidential tip line for reporting “non-compliance” by transgender people who do not use the restroom as the sex they were assigned at birth. Unlike Florida’s law, HB 257 only bars transgender people from changing rooms and locker rooms in government-owned buildings – not restrooms – and restrooms, locker rooms, and changing rooms within Utah public schools. In contrast to Florida, Utah’s bathroom criminalization law does not affect any non-public buildings or private businesses. Depending on the situation, violations of HB 257 can result in between $2,500 to $10,000 in fines and up to 15 years in prison. Additionally, HB 257 requires people to present proof of their birth certificate and gender-affirming surgery if challenged while using the restroom.

    The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission holds federal guidelines that employers cannot deny an employee equal access to a bathroom, locker room, or shower that corresponds to that employee’s gender identity. While the EEOC is a federal agency and liable to change its guidelines, restroom access in the workplace has been relatively asserted in federal court.

    All luggage and passengers must be screened by the Transportation Security Administration when boarding United States aircraft – airports are public spaces that often present additional challenges to transgender people. While TSA restricts a number of items during the screening process, medical equipment, prostheses, binders, packers, and other assistive devices are allowed. Passengers have the right to opt out of advanced imaging technology scanners for thorough pat-downs – AIT devices detect bodily anomalies based on assumed gender and often pick up prosthetics and binding garments. Pat-downs must be done by a TSA agent of the same gender as the traveler’s gender expression (not IDs or boarding passes). In the event a TSA agent is unsure of your gender presentation, they must ask you discreetly and respectfully which gender you’d prefer. You should never be required to lift, remove, or raise an article of clothing to reveal a prosthetic item, and travelers should never be asked to remove prosthetics, breast forms, or binding items.


    ๐Ÿ€SPORTS

    The legal right to participate in competitive sports (amateur or professional) varies by state legislation. There are no federal protections for LGBTQIA+ people’s rights to sports outside of education – non-academic sports hold their own league policies based on organizational beliefs and state law.

    However, while in school, the US Department of Education has stated LGBTQIA+ people are protected under Title IX of the Education Amendments Act since sex discrimination disproportionally affects gay and transgender students. However, Chevron USA Inc. v. National Resources Defense Council overruled that gender identity and transgender people are not inherently included within athletic Title IX protections. As such, transgender people’s access to sports is in constant legal fluctuation. To participate in competitive school athletics, transgender students must be approved by their state guidelines if applicable – such as getting certified by the state athletics agency. Approval is not needed for noncompetitive athletics such as school clubs or physical education classes.

    On February 5th, 2025, President Donald Trump signed the executive order “Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports.” This order mandates that Title IX cannot be used to include transgender people in academic-related sports, including both public K-12 schools and colleges for competitive and non-competitive athletics. While there is no news yet of lawsuits, many states and organizations will likely take this order to federal court due to its overreach in individual state policy.

    While signing this executive order, Trump also declared that transgender people would not be allowed to compete at the US-hosted Olympics in 2028. The International Olympic Committee has not yet given a statement about this claim, although it is critical to note that the President of the United States has zero authority the international event despite it being held within US borders. Given any nation’s leader control over the rules of the Olympics would destroy the fairness of the games.

    ๐Ÿ…INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE
    As of 2021, individual sports within the Olympics determine their guidelines on whether transgender athletes can compete. Therefore, if athletes qualify under their sports guidelines, they qualify to compete in the Olympics without any additional restrictions – however, each sports federation has the power to create its own policies regarding transgender inclusion despite current scientific research.

    Until 2021, the IOC used the 2015 International Olympic Committee Transgender Policy – a set of policies that most Olympic sports federations and leagues still use despite the 2021 change. The Policy states all transgender and nonbinary athletes are welcome to compete without any specific surgeries required or government documents proving their legal gender has been recognized.

    Transgender men and individuals assigned female at birth have no limitations or qualifications to compete within the men’s category; transgender women and those assigned male at birth must demonstrate a total testosterone level in serum below 10 nmol/L for at least 12 months before their first competition and maintain those levels throughout the Olympics.


    ๐ŸƒCROSSFIT
    Transgender athletes are allowed to compete in competitive events such as the CrossFit Games – to do so, athletes must have their gender marker legally changed to correspond with their gender identity on an identifying document such as a birth certificate or driver’s license. CrossFit has maintained this policy since 2019.

    Transgender men and individuals assigned female at birth have no additional requirements to compete, while transgender women and individuals assigned male at birth must demonstrate a total testosterone level in serum below 10 nmol/L for at least 12 months before their first CrossFit competition and maintain those levels during competition.

    โšพMAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL
    All athletes must be assigned male at birth to compete in Major League Baseball, and MLB has no exceptions for transgender athletes. While MLB has a strong anti-harassment policy that includes sexual orientation and gender identity, transgender men and people assigned female at birth are not eligible to play within the league. Other baseball and softball leagues are more lenient regarding trans competitors, such as Minor League Baseball.

    ๐ŸMAJOR LEAGUE CRICKET
    Transgender athletes are barred entirely from playing competitive cricket due to a decision in 2023 by the International Cricket Council. The rules by ICC technically state that only transgender women who have gone through male puberty are ineligible, but Major League Cricket has banned transgender competitors as a whole.

    Before 2023, transgender players were able to compete – Danielle McGahey was the only trans athlete to play before the rule was changed by the ICC.

    ๐Ÿ‰MAJOR LEAGUE RUGBY
    World Rugby does not allow transgender women to compete in any capacity within their leagues. Transgender men and individuals assigned female at birth are only eligible to compete if they can provide adequate medical documentation of their transition.

    USA Rugby uses the 2015 IOC Transgender Policy, allowing transgender competitors that fall within those guidelines.

    International Gay Rugby is fully inclusive of transgender competitors within their leagues.

    โšฝMAJOR LEAGUE SOCCER
    There are no written policies regarding transgender athletes within Major League Soccer. However, MLS would likely use the practices adopted by Major League Baseball of the 2015 IOC Transgender Policy. Similarly, no policies have been set in other soccer leagues such as FIFA – although this is not the case in NWSL, as detailed later.

    The US Soccer Federation oversees American competitors in the Olympics and openly allows transgender players to compete as long as they submit sufficient documentation that their gender identity matches legal or medical standards. This policy is up to interpretation and does not strictly follow the 2015 IOC format.

    ๐Ÿš—NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR STOCK CAR AUTO RACING
    There are no restrictions or policies that limit transgender competitors in professional races like NASCAR, Formula 1, the Grand Prix, etc. since races are not sex-segregated. While not common, transgender racers are welcome to participate – such as former motorsports champion Terri Leigh O’Connell.

    ๐Ÿ€NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION
    There are no restrictions or policies that limit transgender competitors in the National Basketball Association. NBA guidelines actually permit anyone to compete regardless of gender identity if they have the necessary skill. The NBA and WNBA are accepting of LGBTQIA+ players, unlike the NCAA and NAIA.

    ๐ŸˆNATONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
    There are no restrictions or policies that limit transgender competitors in the National Football League. NFL guidelines allow for anyone to compete regardless of gender identity – however, NFL players are selected from college teams which generally do not permit transgender athletes in any capacity.

    ๐Ÿ’NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE
    There are no restrictions or policies that limit transgender competitors in the National Hockey League. NHL guidelines actually permit anyone to compete regardless of gender identity if they have the necessary skill. Only three cisgender women have broken into the male-dominant league: Manon Rhรฉaume, Hayley Wickenheiser, and Kendall Coyne.

    USA Hockey oversees American competitors in the Olympics and consists of hundreds of co-ed programs not restricted by gender. In 2019, USA Hockey created the policy that transgender individuals (men, women, and nonbinary individuals) can continue to compete in non-restricted co-ed programs. Players may compete in sex-segregated programs such as Men’s Hockey or Girls’ Competitive Hockey by providing documentation of at least one year of HRT or puberty blockers.

    ๐ŸฅNATIONAL LACROSSE LEAGUE
    Transgender players are openly allowed to compete within the National Lacrosse League, as noted by the NLL policy that inclusion is a core principle of the sport. Transgender athletes are allowed to compete in sex-segregated leagues that correspond with their gender identity, although specific leagues may have requirements for legal or medical documentation.

    โšฝNATIONAL WOMEN’S SOCCER LEAGUE
    As of 2021, transgender men and anyone assigned female at birth who has begun hormone replacement therapy are ineligible to compete in the National Women’s Soccer League. Transgender women and individuals assigned male at birth are allowed to compete within the NWSL under the 2015 IOC Transgender Policy guidelines.

    ๐ŸPRO VOLLEYBALL FEDERATION
    There are no restrictions or policies that limit transgender competitors in the Pro Volleyball Federation, the leading professional volleyball league in the United States.

    USA Volleyball oversees American competitors in the Olympics and updated their policy in 2021 to require all transgender competitors ages 13 and older to submit lab reports of their testosterone levels to be considered. If approved, transgender players are allowed to compete within their federation.

    โ›ณPROFESSIONAL GOLFERS’ ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA
    Transgender athletes are allowed to compete in the Professional Golfers’ Association of America by submitting proof of their current gender status, such as an updated legal certificate or ID or medical reports on their hormone replacement therapy. However, leagues outside of the PGA (such as the NXXT) may have their own rules that limit transgender competitors.

    US Golf Association still enforces the outdated 2003 IOC Stockholm Consensus that requires transgender competitors to submit proof of genital surgery to be considered eligible to play within the USGA.

    ๐Ÿ’PROFESSIONAL WOMEN’S HOCKEY LEAGUE
    The Premier Hockey League or Professional Women’s Hockey League allows transgender competitors to play without any medical or legal documentation. Transgender women are eligible to play if they have been “living in their transgender identity for a minimum of two years,” transgender men are eligible if they are approved to use testosterone by the PWHL/PHL, and nonbinary individuals are eligible if they fall into either of the above categories assigned to transgender men and women.

    ๐ŸฅŠULTIMATE FIGHTING CHAMPIONSHIP
    The Ultimate Fighting Championship and its competitions allow transgender athletes to compete under the 2015 ICO Transgender Policy guidelines. Transgender fighters are subject to strict testosterone monitoring during competitions, along with other drug tests administered to all fighters in the UFC.

    ๐ŸฅULTIMATE FRISBEE ASSOCIATION
    There are no restrictions or policies that limit transgender competitors in the Ultimate Frisbee Association. Compared to other sports USA Ultimate has one of the most inclusive competitive sports policies and allows transgender players to self-attest their gender category to compete in the men’s, women’s, or mixed division.

    ๐Ÿ€WOMEN’S NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION
    There are no restrictions or policies that limit transgender competitors in the Women’s National Basketball Association, permitting transgender athletes as long as they have the necessary skill. However, very few transgender athletes have made it to the WNBA – the only trans player thus far is Layshia Clarendon with the Indiana Fever.

    This is in opposition to the policies of the NCAA and NAIA: The National Collegiate Athletics Association requires transgender players to submit medical documentation of suppressed testosterone levels throughout the season; the National Association of Intercollegiate Athletes entirely bans transgender competitors who have begun medical transition in any capacity.

    ๐ŸฅŽWOMEN’S PROFESSIONAL FASTPITCH LEAGUE
    There are no restrictions or policies that limit transgender competitors in the Women’s Professional Fastpitch League, especially since they are a relatively new league. However, they are expected to take the same policy approaches as used in volleyball.

    ๐ŸฅŠWORLD BOXING ASSOCIATION
    In 2022, the World Boxing Association installed its policy that transgender athletes must compete in separate divisions from cisgender men and women, utilizing a newly created transgender division. Due to this ruling, transgender fighters are banned from playing in cisgender divisions.

    USA Boxing oversees American competitors in the Olympics and enforces the outdated 2003 IOC Stockholm Consensus that requires transgender competitors to submit proof of genital surgery to be considered eligible to play within USA Boxing.

    ๐Ÿฅ‹WORLD KARATE FEDERATION
    There are no restrictions or policies that limit transgender competitors in the World Karate Federation. Instead, regulations are left to the discretion of individual tournaments and schools. As a general rule, transgender people are welcome to compete as long as they compete fairly as their gender identity.

    USA Karate oversees American competitors in the Olympics and uses the 2015 IOC Transgender Policy regarding transgender competitors.


    โšง๏ธINTERSEX

    Intersex people are included in the same anti-discrimination protections as other LGBTQIA+ people. Intersex people are explicitly included under the US Department of Health and Human Services and Affordable Care Act, federally covering intersex identities within health and social services. Title IX of the Education Amendment also protects intersex people from discrimination and harassment in higher education.

    There are no federal or state laws that prohibit non-consensual medical interventions/surgeries on intersex infants. In the United States, medical professionals reserve the right to perform “normalizing” genital surgeries on intersex infants – with or without the express consent and knowledge of the parents. Since 1996, the American Academy of Pediatrics has held the position that such surgeries and interventions are necessary for the benefit of intersex people.

    The US Department of State will issue nonbinary or “X” passports for intersex and nonbinary individuals seeking to have their documents corrected. For additional information, review Gender Documents above.


    ๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธVOTING

    You have the legal right to vote in United States federal, state, and local elections if:

    • You are a United States citizen.
      • Some areas allow non-citizens to vote in local elections, such as San Francisco, Washington D.C., and Burlington.
      • Citizens living abroad still have a right to vote in US elections, including citizens who were born abroad and have never lived in the US. Voter eligibility is determined by where you or your parents were last registered to vote within the United States.
    • You meet your state’s residency requirements.
      • Homeless individuals are still entitled to vote in the United States. Any mailing address complies with federal and state law to vote, including homeless shelters.
    • You are at least 18 years old on or before Election Day.
      • Nearly every state allows 17-year-olds to register in advance if they will be 18 by Election Day.
      • Some states allow 17-year-olds to vote in primaries before their 18th birthday if they will be 18 by Election Day.
    • You are registered to vote by your state’s registration deadline. Each state has its own deadlines for early voting, absentee voting, and in-person voting.

    You do not have the legal right to vote in the United States elections if:

    • You are not a United States citizen, regardless of whether you are a permanent legal resident. Some cities allow non-citizens to vote in local elections, but you must be a US citizen to vote in all state and federal elections.
    • You are a United States citizen but are residing in a US territory. Citizens in territories can vote in general elections but cannot vote for president.
    • Most (but not all) states prevent people currently incarcerated in jail or prison from voting. A select few states remove the right to vote permanently if you have a felony conviction.
    • Some states prevent people with disabilities from voting.

    Federal law dictates that all first-time voters bring ID when voting, regardless of whether they registered by mail, online, or in-person. Each state has its own policies on whether additional identification is needed to cast your vote – even if it’s not your first time. Accepted forms of ID include driver’s licenses, state ID cards, passports, military IDs, college/school/work IDs, vehicle registration cards, leases, mortgages, house deeds, credit/debit cards, social security cards, Medicaid cards, Medicare cards, health care insurance cards, civic union and professional membership cards, utility and medical bills, school transcripts, bank statements, firearm registration cards, pay stubs, pension statements, and official mail from any government agency. Even if you do not have a form of ID, you may still be able to vote via a provisional ballot. You have the right to vote with a provisional ballot even if your name has a discrepancy or you are not in the poll book.

    US elections allow voters to cast their ballots either in person or by mail. The United States does not have any elections that are online. Your polling place is the physical location assigned to you based on your mailing address, where you will go to vote in federal, state, and local elections. To find your polling place, go to vote411.org. Eligibility to vote by mail or absentee voting is determined by state – mailed ballots must be postmarked or hand delivered to an election authority within two weeks of Election Day.

    As long as you are in line, you maintain the right to vote – even after the polls officially close. You also have the right to request a new ballot if you make a mistake and to understand your ballot in the language you are most familiar with.

    You have the right to be free from voter intimidation and coercion. Examples of voter intimidation include aggressive questions about your citizenship, criminal record, or qualifications to vote, false and misleading signs, and spreading false information about voting.


    References: Important Cases on LGBTQIA+ Rights

    The following is a list of noteworthy or landmark cases decided by the United States courts. Since the United States uses a common law system, it utilizes previous court decisions to make many of its future rulings.

    • One, Inc. v. Olesen (1958). As a spinoff of the Mattachine Society, ONE was one of the earliest LGBTQIA+ publications in the United States – but they were deemed unmailable by the US Post Office Department and Federal Bureau of Investigation in 1954 under the Comstock Act of 1873, which was the federal standard for obscenity laws until 1973. The US Supreme Court ruled ONE did not violate any obscenity laws, upholding the constitutional protection for pro-LGBTQIA+ writing and publications. Additionally, One, Inc. v. Olesen was the first Supreme Court ruling related to LGBTQIA+ issues.
    • Manual Enterprises, Inc. v. Day (1967). During the height of the Lavender Scare and end of the Comstock Act, a great number of LGBTQIA+ publications came under attack as obscene – including physique modeling magazines by H. Lynn Womack, which were deemed unmailable due to obscenity. The 6-1 decision by the Supreme Court legalized the use, sale, and mailing of gay nude pornographic magazines.
    • Tinker v. Des Moines (1969). Five students in Des Moines, Iowa wore black armbands in protest of American involvement in the Vietnam War, which prompted the school to create a policy to suspend such political messaging. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the students, establishing the Tinker Test as the minimum standard a school must prove that free speech is disruptive before it can be censored. In the 7-2 ruling, the Court stated, “It can hardly be argued that either students or teachers shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.”
    • Boutilier v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (1967). Clive Boutilier was denied American citizenship after revealing to the Immigration and Naturalization Service that he had been arrested for consensual same-sex activity in New York City, which he was later deported back to Canada on the basis that homosexuality was an exclusion criterion to legally enter the United States as a “psychopathic personality.” Since homosexuality was not removed by the American Psychiatric Association from the Diagnostic and Statistic Manual until 1973, it was viewed as a mental disorder – leading the Supreme Court to uphold the decision to deport Boutilier and the exclusion criteria of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952. This was later changed by legislative revisions in the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, and Immigration Act of 1990.
    • Baker v. Nelson (1971). The original case that led to marriage equality through Obergefell v. Hodges in 2015, where Richard John Baker and James Michael McConnell applied for a marriage license in Minnesota but were denied for being a same-sex couple. They were the first to argue marriage equality was not forbidden by the US Constitution but was rather supported by various rights such as the First and Fourteenth Amendments. While the Supreme Court dismissed Baker v. Nelson, it set the stage for the arguments used in support of marriage equality.
    • Miller v. California (1973). Marvin Miller was arrested for violating California Penal Code 311.2(a) for operating a mail-order pornographic film and book business, viewing the material as obscene and illegal based on the previous Supreme Court rulings Memoirs v. Massachusetts and Roth v. United States. Eventually, the Supreme Court overturned Miller’s criminal conviction and established the Miller Test – a new federal standard for obscenity that overtook the outdated Comstock Acts of 1873. From 1973 onward, the Supreme Court has evaluated material as obscene or not if it meets all three of the following criteria: 1. the average person finds the material arousing based on contemporary community standards, 2. the average person would find the material as objectively offensive, AND 3. the work has zero serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
    • Roe v. Wade (1973). Norma McCorvey (also known as Jane Roe) filed a lawsuit in Texas after she was denied an abortion since Texas law only permitted abortion as necessary to save the mother’s life. Roe v. Wade set a national precedent that the Fourteenth Amendment guaranteed Americans a right to privacy under the Due Process Clause in a 7-2 vote, which further entitled Americans to the privacy of an abortion. Prior to its overturn in 2022, Roe v. Wade was used as the foundation for many other major cases through the right to privacy and the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of “life, liberty, and property.”
    • Doe v. Commonwealth’s Attorney of Richmond (1976). Two men anonymously challenged the sodomy law in Virginia by arguing the First, Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments protected their constitutional rights, making Doe v. Commonwealth’s Attorney of Richmond the first Supreme Court case to deal with sodomy laws. Even though the court upheld the sodomy law as constitutional and valid, it set the stage later for Lawrence v. Texas by applying the same principles of personal privacy as Roe v. Wade.
    • Fricke v. Lynch (1980). Cumberland High School denied Aaron Fricke the ability to take his same-sex partner to prom due to “real and present threat of physical harm to [Fricke], [his] male escort, and to others.” The federal court ruled that free speech entitles students to bring the date of their choice to school functions, including LGBTQIA+ students since the law does not side with violence. Cumberland High School failed to pursue the “least restrictive alternative” over denying Fricke’s rights, which would have included “determining the need for or logistics of additional security.” Fricke v. Lynch became a foundation that violent counter-protestors do not hold a “heckler’s veto” in overruling others’ rights.
    • National Gay Task Force v. Board of Education (1985). Oklahoma enacted a state law in 1978 that educators could be fired for engaging “in public homosexual conduct or activity” since it would render them unfit to hold the position as a teacher, student teacher, or teacher’s aide. The case ended with a tied 4-4 vote in the Supreme Court where the law was partially upheld and struck down.
    • Bowers v. Hardwick (1986). Michael Hardwick was arrested for felony-charged sodomy in Atlanta, Georgia, which he sued with representation from the ACLU that the arrest and law violated his right to privacy under the Fourteenth Amendment. The Supreme Court ruled in a conflicted 5-4 vote that the Fourteenth Amendment did not include sodomy, even if that sexual activity was between consenting adults. Despite the ruling, Hardwick argued, “there must be a rational basis for the law, and that there is none in this case other than the presumed belief of a majority of the electorate in Georgia that homosexual sodomy is immoral and unacceptable. This is said to be an inadequate rationale to support the law. The law, however, is constantly based on the notions of morality, and if all laws representing essentially moral choices are to be invalidated under the Due Process Clause, the courts will be very busy indeed.”
    • Webster v. Doe (1988). The National Security Act of 1947 authorized the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency to terminate any employee as deemed necessary at their discretion in the security interests of the United States. Former CIA employee John Doe alleged that he was terminated due to his sexual orientation since he had only received “excellent” and “outstanding” employee performances before being fired and CIA Director William J. Casey cited Doe’s homosexuality as a threat to national security.
    • In re Guardianship of Sharon Kowalski (1991). Sharon Kowalski was left paralyzed after being hit by a drunk driver, and placed in the guardianship of her father despite her requests to be placed into the care of her same-sex partner Karen Thompson. Kowalski’s father denied Thompson visitation and moved Kowalski to a nursing home 200 miles away, prompting Thompson to appeal the order. After a long battle, Thompson was given guardianship – becoming the first case establishing partner rights between same-sex couples before marriage equality.
    • Wisconsin v. Mitchell (1993). After discussing the anti-Black sentiments in the film Mississippi Burning with other Black Americans, Todd Mitchell incited a race-driven assault on a local white teenager walking home. Mitchell was convicted of aggravated battery with a raised sentence due to Wisconsin law increasing the penalty since it was committed based on race, religion, color, disability, sexual orientation, national origin, or ancestry. Mitchell appealed, arguing the hate crime law violated his First Amendment rights – but the Supreme Court eventually ruled Wisconsin’s reasoning for the increased penalty was in line with antidiscrimination law since Mitchell had committed the crime out of race-based bias, cementing the legal difference between hate crimes and First Amendment rights.
    • Farmer v. Brennan (1994). Dee Farmer was a transgender woman convicted of credit card fraud and incarcerated in men-only prisons, based on federal prison guidelines that placed transgender prisoners based on their medical transition status. Farmer was beaten, sexually assaulted, and potentially exposed to HIV, prompting her to file a lawsuit that the wardens and prison officials violated her Eighth Amendment rights by ignoring her need for safety despite knowing the increased vulnerability she had as a trans woman. The Supreme Court ruled 9-0 that the “deliberate indifference” to substantial risk of harm to an inmate made prison officials liable under the Eighth Amendment, becoming the first Supreme Court decision that directly addressed sexual assault in prisons.
    • Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Group of Boston (1995). The Irish-American Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Group of Boston was denied the ability to participate in the city’s public celebration and mark for St. Patrick’s Day and Evacuation Day. The Supreme Court sided with the South Boston Allied War Veterans Council that they were allowed to exclude certain organizations on the basis that they remained as a private group that did not receive city funding and had the right to control the public message told by their event. This decision created a legal difference between events organized officially by government entities versus private organizations.
    • Romer v. Evans (1996). Richard Evans was joined by other LGBTQIA+ individuals throughout Colorado to sue over the voter-approved initiative on Amendment 2, which prevented all cities, towns, and counties in Colorado from recognizing LGBTQIA+ people as a protected class under anti-discrimination law. The Supreme Court decided in a 6-3 vote that Amendment 2 was unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. While Romer v. Evans did not require states to include sexual orientation and gender identity within anti-discrimination law, it established that banning their inclusion was irrational according to the law.
    • Nabozny v. Podlesny (1996). Jamie Nabozny was bullied and physically harassed by classmates because of his sexual orientation, and his school failed to intervene on the basis that Nabozny’s decision to be out instigated verbal and physical abuse. With representation from Lambda Legal, Nabozny brought a lawsuit against both his former school district and numerous school officials for failing to protect him as a member of a discernible minority group under the Fourteenth Amendment. The federal court sided with Nabozny, awarding him $962,000 in damages. Additionally, Nabozny v. Podlesney became the foundational case alongside Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 for other anti-LGBTQIA+ bullying cases.
    • Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. (1998). Joseph Oncale was repeatedly humiliated and assaulted by his coworkers at Sundowner Offshore Services, eventually quitting after his supervisors refused to intervene. He filed a complaint, arguing that he had been discriminated against in his work due to his sex – but his claim was originally denied because the court believed sex-related harassment only applied to discrimination between men and women, and Oncale was harassed by his male coworkers on the Gulf of Mexico oil rig. The Supreme Court voted unanimously to reverse this decision, stating that sexual harassment and discrimination can occur between members of the same sex and be done without ‘sexual desire’ under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
    • Baehr v. Miike (1999). Three same-sex couples filed a lawsuit when they were denied marriage licenses in Hawaii, which gained large-scale media attention through the nine years the lawsuit took place. While Baehr v. Miike granted same-sex couples the right to marry for a short time, this was quickly reversed by the federal Defense of Marriage Act. DOMA was written and passed to federally define marriage as the union of one man and one woman, created out of anti-LGBTQIA+ fear that Hawaii’s marriage equality would require other US states to recognize same-sex marriages under the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution.
    • Boy Scouts of America v. Dale (2000). James Dale was expelled from his position as assistant Scoutmaster when Boy Scouts of America officials read in an interview with Dale at Rutgers University that he was gay. In response, Dale filed a lawsuit for discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation – however, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the Boy Scouts of America had the right to so under the First Amendment right to expression despite New Jersey anti-discrimination law on the basis that the Boy Scouts of America was a private organization. This national policy stayed in place until 2014 when queer youth were no longer banned from the organization and in 2015 when the ban on queer adults was further removed.
    • Baker v. Vermont (2000). Following the temporary success of Baehr v. Miike, LGBTQIA+ advocates in Vermont sued that same-sex couples were denied the benefits given to cisgender heterosexual couples through marriage. The Vermont Supreme Court ruled in favor of the advocates, requiring the state to implement a legal alternative to give same-sex couples the same rights and benefits. Baker v. Vermont is not a federal or Supreme Court case, but it established the use of civil unions to give LGBTQIA+ couples the same rights as traditional marriage did.
    • Colรญn v. Orange Unified School District (2000). The Orange Unified School District Board gave Anthony Colรญn and Heather Zeitin the option to finally form their student gay-straight alliance club on the condition they change the club name. Colรญn, Zeitin, and the GSA sued the district for being forced to go through additional barriers and requirements not placed on other student organizations at their school. The federal court ruled that the Equal Access Act granted the GSA the same rights as all other clubs at their school and that additional barriers could not be placed on some clubs and not all.
    • Brandon v. Richardson County (2001). JoAnn Brandon sued the Richardson County Sheriff in Nebraska for his abuse and willful negligence surrounding the murder of her transgender son Brandon Teena, with assistance from Lambda Legal. Despite his duty to protect witnesses, Sheriff Charles B. Laux took it upon himself to notify Brandon Teena’s rapists that he had pressed charges against them and took no steps to protect him from his later murder. The Nebraska Supreme Court found Laux liable both for his negligence and the abuse he committed himself against Brandon Teena. While not a federal or Supreme Court case, Brandon v. Richardson County was a high-profile case that led to the Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009 which was combined to create the federal Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act.
    • Henkle v. Gregory (2002). After publicly coming out as gay in ninth grade, Derek Henkle was consistently harassed by other students. Failing to intervene as appropriate against the bullies, the school blamed Henkle for coming out and transferred him to two other schools before choosing to require Henkle to take GED courses at a local community college instead of reprimanding the anti-gay harassers. Washoe County School District was sued for $451,000 in damages, which was agreed upon before the case went to trial. It was the largest pretrial award of its kind in the United States and proved that previous cases like Nabozny v. Podlesney had long-lasting effects on LGBTQIA+ student rights.
    • Lawrence v. Texas (2003). John Geddes Lawrence Jr. was arrested in his Texas apartment for sodomy, which he appealed through the right to privacy under the Fourteenth Amendment based on the notion that Americans have the personal autonomy to define their private sexual relationships with consenting adults. The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that Texas’s sodomy law was unconstitutional, overruling all of the anti-gay sodomy laws still present throughout the nation and overturning the Supreme Court’s previous decision in Bowers v. Hardwick. Lawrence v. Texas is one of the most famous LGBTQIA+ court cases in the United States since it officially legalized same-sex activity throughout the country.
    • Flores v. Morgan Hill Unified School District (2003). Six students sued Morgan Hill Unified School District for repeatedly ignoring and minimizing student reports of anti-gay bullying. Morgan Hill Unified School District unsuccessfully tried to argue they had qualified immunity. The court ruled with the students, citing the students were members of an identifiable class protected under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the school district had fair warning and knowledge their behavior was unlawful based on previous cases related to anti-gay bullying. Flores v. Morgan Hill Unified School District is not a federal or Supreme Court case, but it is another landmark case used to protect LGBTQIA+ student rights. Flores also established that students merely perceived as LGBTQIA+ maintain the same right to protection as students who are LGBTQIA+.
    • Matter of Matthew Cusick and Cirque du Soleil (2004). After spending months training and clearing exams for a gymnast show Matthew Cusick was hired for by Cirque du Soleil, they fired him shortly before the show because he had HIV. The federal Equal Employment Opportunity Office Commission sided with Cusick, requiring Cirque du Soleil to pay Cusick $600,000 for illegal discrimination since the Americans with Disabilities Act protects all people with disabilities in the United States from employment discrimination – which includes HIV. Matter of Matthew Cusick and Cirque du Soleil was settled without a lawsuit but still established the protections people living with HIV have under disability law.
    • United States v. Marcum (2004). Even though Lawrence v. Texas overturned sodomy laws throughout the United States, it did not automatically overturn similar rules within the US military such as Article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Air Force technical sergeant Eric P. Marcum was tried by court-martial for sodomy under Article 125 and sentenced to 10 years of confinement and a dishonorable discharge. Marcum appealed the ruling, and the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces found that Lawrence applies to the military’s sodomy laws, and United States v. Marcum overturned the remaining sodomy laws in the nation. However, the court did not overturn Marcum’s conviction due to the supervisory authority he held over the subordinate he had sex with. While sodomy laws were finally overturned in the military, Marcum did not overturn Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell – the official US policy that supposedly protected closeted LGBTQIA+ service members from harassment while serving but also barred open LGBTQIA+ people from the military.
    • Finstuen v. Edmondson (2007). Oklahoma enacted an extreme law in 2004 that deemed children adopted by same-sex couples as orphans, even if they were adopted in other states where the adoption was legally sanctioned. The federal court struck down Oklahoma’s law as unconstitutional via the Fourteenth Amendment, protecting the rights of same-sex couples who adopt out-of-state in states where in-state adoption by LGBTQIA+ couples is illegal.
    • Benitez v. North Coast Women’s Care Medical Group (2008). North Coast Women’s Care Medical Group denied Guadalupe “Lupita” Benitez’s infertility treatment because she was a lesbian, claiming their religious beliefs entitled them to withhold care based on her sexuality. According to federal law, healthcare providers still have to uphold state civil rights laws – leading the California Supreme Court to rule that those engaged in business cannot use religious views to cause harm or discriminate despite how sincere their religious views may be. Benitez v. North Coast Women’s Care Medical Group was not a federal or Supreme Court case, but it was a landmark decision that set a precedent in religious exemption laws.
    • Taylor v. Rice (2008). Despite easily passing the application process, Lorenzo Taylor was denied employment by the United States Foreign Service because he had HIV. Taylor argued that the policy barring all HIV-positive candidates from government employment violated the federal Rehabilitation Act that prohibited federal government discrimination against disabilities. Shortly before the trial went to court, the United States Foreign Service changed its policy to allow people living with HIV to work. Taylor v. Rice never went to court, but Matter of Matthew Cusick v. Cirque du Soleil established Taylor’s right to work in the federal government in a non-military role.
    • Snyder v. Phelps (2011). Seven members of the Westboro Baptist Church were led by church founder Fred Phelps to picket the funeral of US Marine Matthew Snyder. Snyder’s father filed a lawsuit against Phelps and Westboro Baptist Church for intentionally inflicting emotional distress, while Phelps argued their picketing fell under appropriate use of their right to free speech and peacefully protest under the First Amendment. The Supreme Court made an 8-1 decision in favor of Phelps – cementing a right to “special protection” under the First Amendment, with specific considerations on whether the picketing done by Westboro did not disturb the memorial itself. Since Westboro and Phelps remained on public property 1,000 feet away from the service and did not physically force Snyder to read/hear their negative speech, they were protected by the right to free speech.
    • Couch v. Wayne Local School District (2012). High school junior Maverick Couch was threatened with suspension for wearing a T-shirt with a rainbow Ichthys (or “sign of the fish”) and the slogan “Jesus Is Not a Homophobe.” Couch had worn the shirt in solidarity with Day of Silence, a national protest in US schools to demonstrate the effects of silencing LGBTQIA+ students by bullying, but the school argued that Couch’s shirt was “sexual in nature and therefore indecent and inappropriate in a school setting.” Lambda Legal backs Couch in filing a federal lawsuit, forcing Wayne Local School District to agree to a settlement of $20,000 and allowing Couch to wear the shirt. While Couch v. Wayne Local School District never went to court, it utilized concrete rationale that Couch was protected by previous cases like Tinker v. Des Moines and the Equal Access Act of 1984.
    • Hollingsworth v. Perry (2013). Also known as Perry v. Schwarzenegger and Perry v. Brown, Hollingsworth v. Perry was a series of federal court cases over California Proposition 8, which tried to ban same-sex marriage through the state’s constitution. The Supreme Court ruled that same-sex marriage was permitted to continue under the decision that proponents of Proposition 8 did not meet the necessary requirements to appeal the original decision to overturn it.
    • United States v. Windsor (2013). Edith Windsor sought to claim federal estate tax exemption after her same-sex spouse Thea Spyer died, who had left her entire estate to Windsor. However, Windsor was barred by Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act which led her to sue the federal government in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. The Supreme Court decided in a vote of 5-4 that Section 3 of DOMA was unconstitutional because it deprived liberty protected by the Fifth Amendment since the Constitution prevented the federal government from treating heterosexual marriages differently than legal or state-sanctioned same-sex marriages. While talked about less than Lawrence v. Texas and Obergefell v. Hodges, United States v. Windsor set the stage for Obergefell by dismantling DOMA the same day the decision for Hollingsworth v. Perry was also issued.
    • Hatcher v. DeSoto County Board of Education (2013). Amber Hatcher was threatened with “ramifications” by her principal if she participated in the student-led demonstration Day of Silence against anti-LGBTQIA+ bullying – and was suspended after being called to the dean’s office. A lawsuit was filed against the DeSoto County Board of Education, using the well-settled precedent that students maintain a right to free speech – which was resolved by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. However, the litigation wasn’t completed until 2014 when the DeSoto County Board of Education finally agreed to institute new policies allowing students going forward to participate in GSA and Day of Silence, as well as expunge Hatcher’s student records.
    • SmithKline Beecham v. Abbott Laboratories (2014). While preparing for SmithKline Beecham v. Abbot Laboratories, Abbott had a juror removed due to their sexual orientation since the case was between two giant pharmacy corporations on anti-HIV medication – a drug that was being used to price gouge LGBTQIA+ people. Instead, SKB v. Abbott Laboratories became a case on whether sexual orientation should be included within protected criteria for jurors based on the 1986 ruling in Batson v. Kentucky where the Supreme Court decided jurors cannot be removed due to race. The federal court ruled that like gender and race, removing jurors based on sexual orientation violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution similar to Batson.
    • Rhoades v. Iowa (2014). Nick Rhoades, a queer man living with HIV, was sentenced to 25 years in prison and lifetime registration as a sex offender after having a one-night stand with a condom in 2008. The other individual in the encounter, Adam Plendl, found out Rhoades’ HIV status through a friend later and contacted the police with the charge he had been unlawfully exposed to HIV. Even though a condom had been used and Plendl did not contract HIV, Rhoades received poor counsel from his attorney to plead guilty to the maximum sentence. Through assistance from Lambda Legal, Rhoades successfully overturned his conviction through the Iowa Supreme Court based on the evolving scientific understanding of HIV and its treatment. Rhoades v. Iowa was not a federal or Supreme Court case, which is why HIV criminalization laws still exist across the United States – but it informs best practices and sets precedents for taking down those laws.
    • Obergefell v. Hodges (2015). Multiple plaintiffs filed federal district court cases in Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee which were combined into Obergefell v. Hodges whether same-sex couples were entitled to state-sanctioned marriage the same way as cisgender heterosexual couples. In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled same-sex couples have a fundamental right to marry through the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause and Equal Protection Clause, overruling all bans on same-sex marriage in the United States and overturning Baker v. Nelson. Further, Obergefell created the legal requirement in all US states and territories to give same-sex couples the ability to marry and have equal protections and benefits as given to different-sex couples.
    • V.L. v. E.L. (2016). In 2007, Georgia granted same-sex partner V.L. adoption and parental rights to the three biological children of her partner E.L. However, after moving back to Alabama, V.L. and E.L. broke up and E.L. blocked V.L. from visitation. V.L. filed a lawsuit for equal custody, but the Supreme Court of Alabama ruled that the adoption was invalid. The US Supreme Court issued a per curiam decision based on the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution that V.L. was entitled to visitation rights since E.L. had expressly consented to the adoption in Georgia and that states must recognize adoption rights of same-sex couples in other states.
    • Pavan v. Smith (2017). Lesbian couples Leigh and Jana Jacobs and Terrah and Marisa Pavan conceived children through anonymous sperm donors, but the State of Arkansas (where the children were born) only recognized and accepted the birth mothers for the children’s birth certificates. Arkansas law required birth certificates to use the names of only biological parents, including in cases of anonymous sperm donors and did not permit non-biological parents to do so. The Supreme Court ruled Arkansas’ law denied queer couples benefits that are inherent to marriage, which further violated Obergefell v. Hodges and granted same-sex couples the right to marital presumption.
    • Hively v. Ivy Tech Community College (2017). Kimberly Hively was an openly lesbian part-time adjunct professor at Ivy Tech Community College but came to the conclusion she was a victim of employment discrimination for her sexual orientation when she was denied the same full-time employment and promotions her colleagues received despite working for the college for 14 years. The federal court ruled 8-3 that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects sexual orientation as a protected class, siding with Hively.
    • Whitaker v. Kenosha Unified School District (2017). Transgender high school senior Ashton Whitaker was denied permission to use the boys’ restroom at his school under the argument that Whitaker’s presence would violate the privacy rights of his male classmates. Using Title IX of the Education Amendments Act and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, Whitaker successfully won over the federal court that Kenosha Unified School District had failed to provide substantial proof that other students or parents would be genuinely harmed in comparison to the harmed caused by denying his request. Whitaker v. Kenosha Unified School District established that anti-transgender discrimination falls within the protections of Title IX as a type of sex-related discrimination.
    • Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission (2018). Colorado bakery Masterpiece Cakeshop was sued for refusing to make a custom wedding cake for a same-sex couple due to religious objection, which violated Colorado’s anti-discrimination laws. The Supreme Court ruled 7-2 in favor of Masterpiece Cakeshop, establishing the owners had a right to exercise free speech and religion as a privately owned business under the precedent of Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Group of Boston and Boy Scouts of America v. Dale.
    • Bostock v. Clayton County (2020). Gerald Bostock was fired from his county job after expressing interest in a gay softball league at work, which he sued over violating his rights under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The United States Supreme Court made a 6-3 decision siding with Bostock, using the same rationale as Hively v. Ivy Tech Community College that sexual orientation is a sub-set of sex-based discrimination and therefore protected within the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The decision was also made for R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Altitude Express, Inc. v. Zarda, which were presented to the Supreme Court the same day due to their related nature. R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. fired transgender employee Aimee Stephens after she gave them notice she would be taking leave for a gender affirmation surgery, arguing that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act enabled them to exercise their power as a religious organization. In Altitude Express, Inc., Donald Zarda was fired for alleged misconduct after telling a client he was gay. Combined, Hively, R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc., Altitude Express Inc., and Bostock v. Clayton County established LGBTQIA+ identities as a protected class within Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, giving federal employment protection based on sexual orientation or gender identity.
    • Mize-Gregg v. Pompeo (2020). Even though same-sex couple Derek Mize and Jonathan Gregg were both US citizens, their daughter Simone was born in the United Kingdom via surrogacy, which the US State Department refused to apply birthright citizenship to her and instead her as a child born out of wedlock only permitted in the US through a three-month tourist visa. According to the Department, same-sex couples were treated as single parents, and Simone was only technically biologically related to Jonathan – who didn’t meet the five-year residency requirement from living abroad in the UK, despite being a natural-born US citizen himself. The federal court ruled with Mize-Gregg, viewing her citizenship as birthright since she was born to two married US citizens and giving same-sex couples the same rights given to different-sex couples under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
    • Kiviti v. Pompeo (2020). Similar to Mize-Gregg v. Pompeo, the US Department of State refused to recognize the natural-born citizenship of Kessem Kiviti since she was the daughter of married same-sex couple Roee and Adiel Kiviti. Kessem Kiviti was seen as a child born out of wedlock since she was born via surrogacy in Canada. Like Mize-Gregg, the federal court sided with Kiviti and granted Kessem her birthright citizenship, ruling that the State Department had been inappropriately applying the “born out of wedlock” requirement of the Immigration and Nationality Act to married same-sex couples.
    • Ely v. Saul (2020). The National Center for Lesbian Rights and GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders filed a class action lawsuit for a number of same-sex spouses who were denied equal access to Social Security survivor’s benefits. According to pre-Obergefell v. Hodges marriage laws, same-sex couples did not meet the requirements to receive the same benefits awarded to cisgender heterosexual married couples. The district courts in Arizona and California ruled that same-sex spouses were entitled to Social Security benefits, giving the right to survivor’s benefits to LGBTQIA+ couples across the nation after the Social Security Administration withdrew its appeal and began processing the claims.
    • Fulton v. City of Philadelphia (2021). The Roman Catholic Archdioceses of Philadelphia, which operated the Catholic Social Services foster care agency for the city, held a policy that they automatically refused LGBTQIA+ people as potential foster families due to religious belief. Several foster couples, including Sharonell Fulton and Toni Simms-Busch, brought a lawsuit against the city and Catholic Social Services for discriminating based on sexual orientation. The Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the city of Philadelphia and Catholic Social Services had violated same-sex couples’ protection under the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment, making a legal distinction that government-affiliated and contracted services like foster care are not applicable to exclude LGBTQIA+ people due to freedom of religion.
    • 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis (2023). Lorie Smith, owner of website development company 303 Creative, LLC, made up a fake claim over a gay man named “Stewart” who had contacted her to make a website for his and his partner’s wedding. In her story, Smith argued it was against her faith as a Christian to do so and wanted to make a public notice on her website that she was unwilling to create websites that promoted same-sex relationships. Despite this story being entirely fake, Smith used it to take Colorado’s anti-discrimination law to court to legalize the use of “No Gays Allowed” signage in private businesses. The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in favor of Smith, under the argument that 303 Creative was a private business that could exercise its First Amendment freedoms. The entire 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis case was controversial since it was based on a fabricated story, and internet archival data show that Smith and 303 Creative had zero Christian messaging until after she filed the lawsuit.
    • United States v. Skrmetti (2025). Three transgender teenagers filed a lawsuit against the State of Tennessee regarding HB 1, which prohibited gender-affirming care such as hormone replacement therapy or puberty blockers for minors regardless of whether they had parental permission and an official medical diagnosis. In late 2024, United States v. Skrmetti was brought to the Supreme Court to decide the fate of all gender-affirming care bans for minors across the country – determining whether the anti-transgender sex discrimination in such legislation is about to outweigh states’ control of medical care post-Roe v. Wade.

    Advocates for Trans Equality @ transequality.org / Trans-centered legal organization that provides case litigation, election endorsements, and policy lobbying. Formerly known as the National Center for Transgender Equality and Transgender Legal Defense and Education Fund, A4TE operates both the Trans Legal Service Network (which connects users with steps on updating legal names and gender markers by state) and Trans Health Project at transhealthproject.org (which guides users through the healthcare insurance process to access care).

    AIDS United @ aidsunited.org / National policy and advocacy organization that provides support and guidance related to HIV and AIDS. Their policy action center and resources connect users with tools on HIV issues.

    American Bar Association @ americanbar.org / Membership organization that hosts online directories of pro bono and other free resources. abafreelegalanswers.org provides virtual legal advice at no cost.

    American Civil Liberties Union @ aclu.org / Human rights organization that has aimed “to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to every person in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States” since 1920. ACLU has chapters in every state that takes on court battles and campaigns, and their website hosts simplified guides on LGBTQIA+ rights, HIV, disability, prisoners, religious liberty, free speech, immigration, voting rights, and more.

    Black & Pink @ blackandpink.org / Social justice and prison abolition organization that serves LGBTQIA+ people affected by the justice system. Black & Pink operates several programs to best transition queer and transgender people from detention into civil society with the best chance for stable outcomes – including their immensely popular pen pal program that connects LGBTQIA+ inmates.

    Equality Federation @ equalityfederation.org / Non-partisan lobby and policy organization centered on LGBTQIA+ legislation throughout the United States. Their state legislation trackers allow users to find up-to-date information on recent pro and anti-queer bills.

    Erin in the Morning @ erininthemorning.com / Independent transgender reporter who gives regular updates to LGBTQIA+ legislation throughout the United States on various social media platforms like TikTok, Bluesky, Instagram, etc.

    Family Caregiver Alliance @ caregiver.org / Provides legal support and resources to family caregivers through planning, wellness programs, consultation vouchers, and ongoing digital support through the FCA CareNav. FCA also provides in-depth information about the legal rights and concerns of LGBTQIA+ individuals in the caregiving process.

    FindLaw @ findlaw.com / Online legal dictionary and law directory, allowing anyone to research federal, state, or local laws as well as find relevant legal forms.

    Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders @ glad.org / Litigation defense that provides national representation to anti-LGBTQIA+ laws and cases. Also provides free and confidential legal assistance and referrals via GLAD Law Answers.

    Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network @ glsen.org / LGBTQIA+ organization that provides national support for queer and transgender students and educators in public schools. Offers case litigation and representation through its national and local branches, and provides state-by-state information at maps.glsen.org.

    GLAAD @ glaad.org / American non-profit that works in media and legislation to ensure LGBTQIA+ people are fairly represented. Their accountability projects give media and entertainment industries guidance for LGBTQIA+ stories, as well as track the amount of representation versus censorship of queer identities in media per year.

    Human Rights Campaign @ hrc.org / Civil rights organization that creates resources and guidance on LGBTQIA+ topics in addition to litigation and policy lobbying.

    Immigrant Legal Resource Center @ ilrc.org / Network of attorneys, paralegals, and community-based advocates for immigrant justice within the United States. Offers legal information, ICE sightings and hotlines, a provider directory, and red cards to give immigrants easy access to show their rights regardless of language ability.

    Immigration Equality @ immigrationequality.org / Legal assistance organization for LGBTQIA+ immigrants and immigrants living with HIV. Their Asylum Manual is a free resource over various laws, policies, and rights that apply to queer and transgender immigrants.

    International Association of LGBTQ Judges @ lgbtqjudges.org / Worldwide collective of LGBTQIA+ judges that provides resources and funding to queer and transgender people aspiring to go into law.

    International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans, and Intersex Association @ ilga.org / Federation of nearly 2,000 organizations in over 160 countries around the world that work alongside the United Nations to ensure LGBTQIA+ people are given the basic human rights and dignity they deserve.

    interACT @ interactadvocates.org / Youth-centered organization that works to end intersex human rights abuses across the world through legislation that values intersex bodily autonomy.

    Justia @ justia.com / Collection of legal guides that explain laws, legal services, and policies around the world in everyday terms.

    Lambda Legal @ lambdalegal.org / Advocacy and litigation organization that represents the interests of LGBTQIA+ people in the United States. Along with the ACLU and GLAD, Lambda Legal is one of the top organizations in the country fighting for queer and transgender rights.

    LawHelp @ lawhelp.org / Program of Pro Bono Network to bring the power of law to everyone regardless of education or class. In addition to explaining the law in everyday terms, LawHelp and Pro Bono Net also provide legal assistance to immigrants via Immi and direct users to free legal documents as needed through LawHelp Interactive.

    Legal Services Corporation @ lsc.gov / Independent nonprofit established by Congress to provide financial support and civil legal aid to low-income Americans. Their directory connects you to the nearest LSC-funded legal aid organization.

    LGBTQ Victory Fund @ victoryfund.org / Political endorsement organization that supports LGBTQIA+ candidates seeking political office that align with pro-equality and pro-choice platforms.

    Modern Military Association of America @ modernmilitary.org / Formerly known as the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, Modern Military is the largest LGBTQIA+ military organization in the United States. Modern Military provides a variety of services, including litigation against anti-LGBTQIA+ laws.

    Movement Advancement Project @ lgbtmap.org / Independent nonprofit think tank that ongoingly publishes research on LGBTQIA+ laws throughout the United States. MAP’s graphics offer general guidance on the number of protections or anti-LGBTQIA+ laws a state or territory has.

    National Black Justice Coalition @ nbjc.org / The leading civil rights organization for Black LGBTQIA+ people in the United States, offering toolkits and resources in addition to political lobbying in favor of pro-queer and transgender rights.

    National Center for Lesbian Rights @ nclrights.org / Despite the name, the National Center for Lesbian Rights is committed to advancing the civil and human rights of all LGBTQIA+ people through litigation, legislation, policy, and public education.

    National Gay and Lesbian Task Force @ thetaskforce.org / The oldest national LGBTQIA+ rights organization in the United States that organizes census and voting campaigns as well as FedWatch, a network of over 400 organizations interested in federal policy advocacy.

    National LGBTQ+ Bar Association @ lgbtqbar.org / National association of LGBTQIA+ lawyers, judges, law students, legal professionals, and affiliated legal organizations interested in promoting justice through diversity. The Association’s Affiliate Congress is a free directory of state voluntary bar associations for those seeking LGBTQIA+ legal counsel.

    NMAC @ nmac.org /Also known as the National Minority AIDS Council, NMAC leads HIV policy and legislation related to communities of color. Their Advocacy 101 section guides users to become politically active and involved in local legislation with their elected representatives.

    Nolo @ nolo.com / One of the world’s largest libraries of consumer-friendly legal information, available entirely for free. Nolo provides free information on all areas of law, and continues to sell the same legal advice books that made them famous in the 1970s with easily understandable language.

    Outright Action International @ outrightinternational.org / Advocacy organization dedicated to the LGBTQIA+ human rights movement throughout the world. Outright Action engages with the United Nations to develop global programs and initiatives towards creating a safer world for LGBTQIA+ people.

    Pride Law Fund @ pridelawfund.squarespace.com / Funding service that sponsors legal projects and services, as well as education and outreach that promote the legal rights of LGBTQIA+ people and people living with HIV.

    Southern Poverty Law Center @ splcenter.org / Racial justice organization that researches American hate groups and bias-related crimes. The SPLC’s Hate Map lists and reports recent hate-motivated crimes throughout the country, with information about relevant organizations and court cases.

    Sylvia Rivera Law Project @ srlp.org / Collective founded to increase the political voice and visibility of low-income people and people of color who are transgender, nonbinary, intersex, or gender-nonconforming. SRLP’s programs and legal assistance are geared towards transgender people who are at risk of homelessness, have criminal records, or are immigrants.

    Transgender Law Center @ transgenderlawcenter.org / Litigation organization that offers legal services and representation to transgender people in the United States. TLC has a number of programs for transgender immigrants, people living with HIV, people with disabilities, and people of color. Their Prison Mail Program also connects transgender people in prison, jails, state hospitals, and other forms of detention with legal services via TLC.

    Trans Legislation Tracker @ translegislation.com / Independent research organization that tracks bills related to transgender and nonbinary people in the United States through the work of academics and journalists that publish the Trans Legislation Tracker’s data.

    Vote411 @ vote411.org / Program by the League of Women Voters Education Fund that serves as a “one-stop-shop” for everything election-related with nonpartisan information. Vote411 provides guidance on general and state elections, as well as voter rights, election dates, absentee ballots, early voting, candidates, ID requirements, polling locations, registration, and more.

    VOTE.GOV @ vote.gov / The official website of the United States on voter registration and information, operated by the General Services Administration and US Election Assistance Commission. Vote.gov gives detailed information about voting rights and requirements – including whether you are a first-time voter, college student, homeless, active military member, or have a felony conviction.

    Williams Institute at UCLA @ williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu / Independent research organization that conducts data on sexual orientation and gender identity in relation to law and public policy.

  • Allyship 101 & Resources

    Allyship 101 & Resources

    We all have to start somewhere – most people are born wanting to be kind and compassionate, but it takes work to undo the underlying negativity we’re taught. Here are some basic concepts to read about, regardless of where you are in your allyship and social justice journey. Or go directly to the end of the page to see resources.

    Glossary & Definitions

    Common terms that will be used in this post – and are thrown around in the social justice sphere. Not many people take the time to explain them, so here are the definitions as I will be using them.

    SOCIAL JUSTICE

    The belief that ALL people deserve equal economic, political, and social rights/opportunities. In an ideal world, everyone has an equal chance to be happy, healthy, and grow. However, both in current society and throughout history, there is social injustice: certain people get extra opportunities while others get less based on things outside of their control, like race, gender, class, ability, etc.

    The goal of social justice is to remedy injustice, often by helping those experiencing injustice or getting rid of the causes that create injustice.

    OPPRESSION VS. MARGINALIZATION

    Both oppression and marginalization are big words used interchangeably in the social justice sphere. Oppression refers to the unjust or cruel use of authority and/or power whereas marginalization is the unjust treatment of a person or group based on identity.

    The technical difference between the two is that oppression is carried out by the powerful (like governments) while marginalization can be done by anyone – including you and me. For more, continue reading and look for the “types of oppression” section of this article.

    ALLYSHIP & ALLIES

    Allyship is the practice of actively working to create social justice and end social injustice, even when particular injustices do not directly affect you. Allyship is active because it is not a fad that one does in their free time – it’s ongoing and often tiring, a commitment to calling out yourself and others when you purposely or unknowingly benefit from injustice.

    There are a lot of words that people will use to get this message across – advocates, supports, allies, and so forth. The general idea is that to practice social justice and be a compassionate human, you have to commit to the practice even when it is difficult. If allyship was easy, injustice would not exist. Allies are not perfect people who will never do wrong – they’re humans who generally aim to create a better society and are willing to work to make that society a reality.


    Identity Markers: Who am I?

    To understand social justice and marginalization, you have to understand identity markers. Identity markers are parts of your identity or self – these markers are most commonly used to discriminate and harm people, but they also create community. They range from aspects like race and ethnicity to everyday hobbies.

    Kimberlรฉ Crenshaw’s theory of intersectionality is founded on the understanding of identity markers. Race, ethnicity, gender identity, sexuality, class, first language, religion, national origin, ability, age, and body size are just a FEW identity markers.

    Remember: everyone has identity markers. As an exercise, I invite you to take a moment and think about which identities matter the most to you, and which matter less. For example, everyone has a racial identity, but how important is race to you? It is more or less important than your identity related to sexuality, gender, religion, or even your hobbies? There are no right or wrong answers, but understanding identity markers is an integral starting point since the majority of people never critically think about their identities. Those identities shape how you see the world – like if you think the world is fundamentally fair or if it’s warped by greed and cruelty.


    The Five Fundamentals of Social Justice

    When teaching social justice, I always emphasize five fundamental principles: human rights, resources, equity, participation, and diversity. I’ll be going over all of them later, but note that all five of these fundamentals are equally important. There’s no single principle that is more important than the others. Pursuing social justice means you are actively pursuing all five of these principles – if you don’t, you’ll create injustice later on.

    The Five Fundamentals of Social Justice: Human Rights, Resources, Diversity, Equity, and Participation.

    Let’s Begin: Human Rights

    Human rights are basic fundamental rights that every single person is entitled to solely because they are a person – regardless of where they’re from, the color of their skin, sexual orientation, gender identity, wealth, past crimes, ability to speak English, or anything else.

    These are rights that do not need to be earned and cannot be lost – you were born entitled to these rights. Most of the world followed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), a document with 30 fundamental rights written in 1948 in response to WWII. It’s the most translated document in the world and available in over 500 different languages as well as a comic format and easy-to-understand simplified version. The UDHR isn’t comprehensive, but it outlines 30 basic principles that the majority of the world has agreed are integral to being human. Before it, the world didn’t have a consensus before the Holocaust that all people deserve a certain level of rights.

    It’s also worth mentioning that the UDHR is a document through the United Nations. The UN does have power, but that power isn’t absolute since it cannot physically force countries like Russia, North Korea, or Iran to stop committing human rights violations. Instead, they offer guidance – like whether certain countries should be assisted in times of need, if trade should be barred, and they keep detailed documentation and accountability on world powers.

    Making Change: Participation

    In social justice, participation refers to whether everyone has access to voice their opinions/concerns AND if they can create genuine change. There are places in the world where people are denied the right to vote or be in public forums and town halls, and there are other places where their votes are meaningless and don’t create actual policy reform.

    An example of the first type of participation injustice revolves around the United States territory of Puerto Rico, which is home to over three million people in the Caribbean. Like all US territories, Puerto Ricans cannot vote in presidential elections and have no federal representation in Congress – even though they’re considered United States citizens by birthright. Their tax dollars go towards federal legislation and projects, but they’ve been denied to become the 51st state despite voting in favor during referendums in 2024, 2020, 2017, and 2012. It has a similar vibe to the same reasons the United States originally went to war for its independence from the United Kingdom, but Puerto Rico’s residents are denied the ability to voice themselves.

    An example of the second type of participation injustice is federal legislation passed and vetoed here in the United States. For the majority of real democracies, bills have a greater chance to become law if a greater number of voters favor that bill – and vice versa for unfavorable bills the general public dislikes. However, all bills discussed in Congress have a 30% chance of becoming law – regardless of whether Americans love or hate that bill. The average American has “a miniscule, near-zero, statistically non-significant impact” on laws. Instead, bills become laws in Congress based on the favorability of the United States’ upper classes – which is why even though the average American supports more accessible or universal healthcare, abortion protection, and same-sex marriage, Congress refuses to support those interests. The American public doesn’t support the idea of a national ban on TikTok, but large corporations like Meta fuel bills in Washington D.C do.

    Stuff! Also known as… Resources.

    Resources are the things we need to have happy, healthy lives BUT can run out because they’re finite. In my opinion, the simplest definition of resources is “stuff.” In a just society, everyone has equal resources regardless of who they are: every person has clean water, healthy food options, healthcare, housing, etc. Many countries have welfare programs and policies to disperse resources and discourage hoarding – like universal healthcare, free childcare, minimum wage, higher education, pensions, and income supplements.

    In unjust societies, resources are hoarded and kept by a small number of people – often called the elite, upper class, or Top 10%. Those resources then become inaccessible to the general public, especially those in poverty. The two most common examples of resource injustice in the United States relate to housing and medicine – wealthy individuals and corporations purchase massive amounts of housing across the nation with the intent of renting out those properties or selling them at a higher price. The US doesn’t have a “housing shortage” because the houses don’t exist, the US has a shortage because houses are being hoarded by a small number of people intentionally raising prices as high as possible. On the other hand, medication can only be produced by licensed entities – and most medications in the United States are protected by corporation-owned patents. These companies have the power and authority to price medication at any price with the understanding that if a product is life-saving, then Americans will pay any price to not die.

    Infographic on the cost of insulin over the years in the United States, compared to other countries. Even though insulin only costs $2-4 to produce, it costed $275 in 2022 - while it costs under $30 in Japan, Australia, UK, Canada, and Germany.
    Even though insulin costs $2-4 to produce, the average vial cost $275 in 2022 in the United States – astronomically higher than anywhere else in the world. The primary manufacturer of insulin, Eli Lilly, only lowered prices in 2024 due to public pressure and government intervention through the Inflation Reduction Act.

    Equity, Not Equality

    Both equality and equity are important – but the difference can be hard to grasp. We want equality, but we have to use equity to get there. Over the centuries, some groups of people have had more access to resources and freedoms than others, so they have built up wealth (aka generational wealth). To get society back on track and create a socially just world, we have to implement short-term equity to bring those without wealth to the same standard as the wealthy.

    A real-world historical example of this is the wealth gap between Black and white families in the United States. As a general rule, white families have had over two hundred years to buy land, build businesses, and grow their families’ wealth – which has afforded them university degrees, political offices, and access to the stock market. I say general rule because this is a large generalization – there are millions of white Americans living in poverty, and not all white families can trace their roots to the birth of the US. On the other hand, Black families were not just kept in poverty but enslaved from birth until death – and the cycle continued with practices like predatory sharecropping that kept Black families in debt to their white landlords post-Civil War. In comparison, Black Americans have lacked the same opportunities to build their own generational wealth through buying land, creating businesses, going to university, etc.

    Equality is great when talking about rights – everyone deserves the same treatment. It’s also great when we talk about the ideal society, where everyone has the same opportunities. It’s not great when talking about resources since things are already unequal due to history. In short, equality is giving all people the same exact resources and freedoms regardless of need while equity distributes resources and services based on need and circumstance. Resources are finite, so we have to ensure things go to those who need them most.

    As an exercise, imagine Congress has approved a bill that aims to bring United States public schools technologically up-to-date with new Chromebooks for students to use while in class – since there’s only so much money approved by the bill, we have to decide the best way to divide up the funds and computers across the US. If we applied an equality-based outlook, every single public school in America would be given the same number of Chromebooks. The pro to this method is that it’s the fairest since it’s based on equality, but it’s not efficient at solving the problem: due to the American education system, there’s a LARGE gap in the quality and funding schools in rich suburban neighborhoods receive compared to schools in poor rural or urban neighborhoods. This method will give new computers to wealthy schools that already have resources and not enough computers to poor schools that are lacking. Yet, imagine if we went with an equitable approach and the Chromebooks were instead given to public schools based on need – wealthy schools would get significantly less due to their lack of need, while the gaps would be filled by supplying more computers to poorly funded schools. The equitable outlook has a greater positive effect and brings the education system closer to pursuing equality in the future by closing the gap.

    You can apply this mentality with a lot of things – it’s how welfare is operated throughout most of the world, including the United States. S.N.A.P. (food assistance or food stamps) aren’t given to every single American – that would cost way too much money than the system can handle currently – so instead, it’s given to Americans based on income-related need. Government healthcare and Medicaid, disability and social security, Pell Grants for higher education, housing assistance programs, tax credits, and cash assistance are all operated based on equitable need.

    Four panel comic showing three figures representing reality, equality, equity, and liberation as they try to watch a baseball game.
    Most people have seen the above image when beginning their journey in social justice and liberation. It takes the above theory and illustrates it nicely for viewers to interpret the difference between equality and equity. In the first panel, the reality of life is that some people hoard resources (the boxes or crates) while others are prevented by barriers (the fence). The second panel illustrates equality, where all three figures are given one crate to stand on to watch the match – but this only helps one of them, since the rightmost person is still barred. Through equity in the third panel, the crates are distributed based on need – so the tallest person stands on their own, while the shortest is given an additional crate, allowing all three of them to see the game. Finally, the fourth panel is the goal of social justice – to create a better world without injustice, where the barrier has been removed entirely.

    Diversity is good, actually.

    For a just society, we have to actively hear opinions from backgrounds different than our own. This includes different racial, religious, economic, sexual, and even political backgrounds. If a group of powerful people is lacking in diversity, you should ask why others are unable to participate.

    Echo chambers harm everyone, and we all benefit from listening to alternative perspectives. By adding diversity, you’re able to develop and defend your own ideas. Ideas that don’t have room to be challenged are always faulty beliefs. Accidents and public scandals happen when diversity isn’t present – like when Amazon served its staff watermelon and Kool-Aid for Juneteenth or when your local store puts Chinese New Year merchandise for sale in preparation for January 1st. When power is diversified, those scandals and errors are able to be corrected before they make large-scale impact. That being said, it’s easy to ignore diversity in favor of filling positions with just anyone – and due to the history of inequality, “just anyone” tends to be cisgender, straight, white, Christian, and able-bodied in the United States.

    It’s not a vacuum – social justice is connected!

    Next, think about the following statement: “In 2020, 86% of CEOs in America were white cisgender straight men.” Why?

    Let’s take the five principles of social justice and dissect this:

    • DIVERSITY. There is a lack of women, transgender people, queer people, and people of color in positions of power. Since most boards and high-level corporations are run by white cisgender straight men, they unconsciously make decisions that benefit people like them rather than others – like donating to organizations to end DEI or giving staff little maternity leave.
    • PARTICIPATION. As mentioned in the participation section, the wealthy have the largest effect on US laws – which includes CEOs. In comparison to the average American, CEOs get to participate in creating change more than anyone else – which influences the real laws that pass in Congress.
    • EQUITY. To be a CEO, you almost always have to have a high-level degree – which is something that other people don’t have equitable access to if they’re unlucky enough to be stuck in an underfunded school district without paths towards accessible higher education.
    • HUMAN RIGHTS. The wealthy don’t have to worry about access to basic things like healthcare, education, shelter, and food – the types of human rights that are not guaranteed in America, largely due to corporate lobbying. Rather than budget and worry about these needs, they can focus on higher education and career advancement.
    • RESOURCES. The university degrees and connections necessary to become a CEO require a lot of time and money – which white cisgender straight men have significantly more of on average than other groups. Time spent on studying and going to networking events doesn’t have to be spent on taking a second job to pay rent.
    [googleapps domain=”docs” dir=”forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdLuIRY4qvKBqj8Cuz2w9ktJ3MpmcWc4lxTG6FUE8RMZHWLEg/viewform” query=”embedded=true” width=”640″ height=”480″ /]

    Make Your Allyship Active

    The Allyship Iceberg: Drawing of iceberg, showing the difference between "performative allyship" versus "real allyship." Performative allyship is support only done when it's visible, whereas real allyship is when one works to change society even when no one is watching.
    Allyship is not easy – but it’s a baseline skill to become a better person and a good activist. Real allyship is consistent and shouldn’t matter if anyone is watching you or if you’ll get more followers for posting your solidarity. You’re an ally because you’re a good person and want a better world, even if it might lose you followers.

    Allyship requires the commitment to call injustice to attention – you have to want to change society to become better, especially when it’s inconvenient. Otherwise, your allyship is performative. The journey towards allyship is a lifelong practice accompanied by the decision to keep learning – even when you mess up. Good intentions are only valuable if they come with a willingness to accept mistakes and keep going. No one is a jerk for not knowing the latest politically correct term, especially if you’re committed to correcting yourself as needed.

    Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Unconscious Bias

    Believe it or not, stereotypes are generalized beliefs that try to keep us safe – we make broad assumptions based on previous experiences and information. Stereotypes are useful when we assume a brightly colored frog will probably be poisonous, that green bananas are not as sweet and tasty as non-green ones, or that a growling bear might maul us. And throughout evolution and history, stereotypes informed us that we should stick to people like ourselves since other groups within the Homo genus were less likely to take care of our needs and well-being.

    Stereotypes become negative and unhelpful when applied to modern humans – which is when they warp into prejudice. An English woman in the Middle Ages might have held the stereotype that French people were aggressive and dangerous, fueled by the information told to her through the countless wars between England and France – and that stereotype likely kept her family safe and away from war during her lifetime. Today, that stereotype is counterproductive in a time of intercultural dialogue and diplomacy over violence. Instead, stereotypes influence us to think worse of people based on identity markers – like being Black, Asian, Latine, Indigenous, queer, transgender, disabled, female, or poor.

    Unconscious bias is another term for implicit stereotypes, beliefs we fundamentally hold in our inner psyche despite knowing better. They’re ingrained from growing up in an unjust world, and we’re gradually taught these biases through our parents, extended family, friends, schools, religious mentors, coaches, bosses, colleagues, and communities. They’re unconscious because you rarely think about them and they’re as irrational and poorly formed as most of the unconscious self. It doesn’t even matter if you’re directly affected by a certain bias or stereotype – Black Americans commonly hold anti-Black unconscious biases, even if they’re counterproductive, and the same can be said for other marginalized groups.

    If you’re curious about learning more about your own unconscious biases, Project Implicit is an international collective through Harvard University that lets you test for a variety of biases for free – like homophobia, Islamophobia, ableism, racism, sexism, transphobia, ageism, etc.


    Three Types of Oppression: Oh My!

    Oppression, or the unjust use of power, manifests in at least one of three ways: institutionally, culturally, or individually. Like the five fundamentals of social justice, no singular type of oppression is superior – they feed into one another, and all three must be combated if you want your allyship to make real change.

    Graphic of the Three Types of Oppression, which show institutional, cultural, and individual feeding into one another.

    Individual Oppression

    If an -ism (ex. racism, ableism, heterosexism.) is on a one-on-one level, it’s likely individual oppression – this is the type of oppression and discrimination that anyone can do regardless of identity, privilege, or power. Individual oppression is defined as the personal feelings, assumptions, actions, and behaviors any one person has/does toward others.

    COMMON EXAMPLES OF INDIVIDUAL OPPRESSION:

    • Misgendering and/or deadnaming
    • Telling a sexist joke
    • Calling someone a slur or otherwise derogatory term
    • Crossing the street to avoid being near a person of color
    • Physically harming another person

    Real-World Example of Individual Oppression
    While walking home with their groceries, queer couple Destiny and Addison are holding hands in public. A furious man storms up to them, calls them d*kes, and shoves them to the ground before he’s pulled away by bystanders.

    The above example checks all the boxes for individual oppression – it’s a very localized example of one person acting out towards two other individuals based on his personal prejudices – and he doesn’t appear to have any remarkable power or authority.

    Institutional Oppression

    Also known as systemic oppression, institutional oppression is the type of cruelty most people envision when they discuss the injustices of the world. Institutional oppression is the laws, policies, and practices placed upon us by “institutions,” or groups, organizations, or people with immense power.

    “Groups, organizations, and people with immense power” is vague – but it purposely includes a lot of people. Institutional oppression is carried out by political figures like members of Congress and the Supreme Court, but also local school boards, lobbying groups, and corporations. On the world stage, institutional oppression is a president or high-level official making cruel decisions on a whim – but systemic oppression looks different on the local level. In our everyday lives and communities, institutional oppression often masks itself in bureaucracy and red tape – but it’s easier to spot once you start asking why such barriers exist.

    COMMON EXAMPLES OF INSTITUTIONAL OPPRESSION:

    • Laws prohibiting abortion or same-sex marriage
    • Businesses refusing to interview or hire Black names
    • Insurance companies requiring certain high-level diagnoses for hormone replacement therapy
    • Banks that refuse to give loans or mortgages to low-income households
    • Glass ceilings where minorities are barred from promotion

    Real-World Example of Institutional Oppression
    Corporationโ„ข makes an official policy that all transgender staff must use the restroom as their sex assigned at birth rather than the one that matches their gender identity while working.

    This example could apply to a mega-business like Walmart or Amazon as well as a local store with only three employees – this is a classic example of institutional oppression because it’s a cruel policy being enforced by an entity with authority, such as a boss, business, board director, or corporation. Institutional oppression can be carried out by individual people, but it’s defined by the level of power someone has based on circumstance.

    Cultural Oppression

    Out of the three types of oppression, cultural oppression is the most difficult to grasp. It’s also referred to as structural oppression, and cultural oppression is the many -isms that influence our biases. Cultural oppression is the collection of beliefs from society about certain identities, such as people of color or LGBTQIA+ people. Most people are unable to directly contribute to cultural oppression – to do so, you have to have a good amount of power within public perception. Due to that, celebrities and the media have the most sway here – but it also includes religion and the stereotypes we hear from our families and communities growing up. Notice that cultural oppression tends to be in the middle compared to individual and institutional oppression: these figures have remarkably less power in creating laws, but they have power in influencing the way we think and feel.

    COMMON EXAMPLES OF CULTURAL OPPRESSION:

    • Gender roles that expect women to take family-centric roles and wear makeup
    • Stereotypes that argue white neighborhoods are inherently safer than Black neighborhoods
    • Movies that contain problematic themes, like blackface or vilify transgender people

    Real-World Example of Cultural Oppression
    The latest AAA video game makes record sales but contains anti-LGBTQIA+ themes where transgender people are shamed during a major quest line.

    Both the video game itself and those who wrote and created the game are at fault for cultural oppression in this example. Its developers refused to alter the game’s transphobic themes – and each player that encounters the game will learn anti-LGBTQIA+ stereotypes from it, especially if they lack media literacy or critical thinking.

    The Monster Known as Oppression

    The most daunting aspect of social justice and learning about oppression is understanding how these three types of oppression feed themselves – it’s a cycle that benefits those in power to cause more cruelty. Religion uses cultural oppression to teach individuals in the public to demonize LGBTQIA+ people, whereas politicians are taught to cast out queer and trans people through cruel laws. Those laws and stereotypes teach everyday people that LGBTQIA+ people deserve this cruelty and discourage them from taking action. Or that as society teaches that whiteness is better than Blackness through racist biases, a popular online artist creates content that features whitewashing. As that content gets likes and shares, it influences individuals with racist undertones – and those individuals make up the stereotypes society has about Blackness.

    “Every time a finger gets pointed at a person – whether theyโ€™re a Fortune 500 CEO or a high school student – weโ€™re focusing on an -ist… Every campaign to โ€œcancelโ€ an -ist – whether successful or not – isnโ€™t the same as addressing the system. It brings our attention away from the system and toward an individual within it.”

    – “-isms, not -ists,” by It’s Pronounced Metrosexual/Sam Killermann


    What is Privilege?

    Privilege is the result of society and institutions valuing certain bodies over others, giving them unearned advantages based on identity. Since privilege is based on identity, it’s entirely outside of your control – no one gets to choose being born Black, able-bodied, cisgender, or queer. By that logic, no one can be an inherently bad person because of privilege.

    Privilege is defined by “unearned advantages” – having a certain privilege does not mean you’ve never had to struggle. Most people have struggles in their lives, and everyone has at least one or two privileges and non-privilege. Instead, privilege is the fact you have not been weighed down by additional baggage tied to one identity. The purpose of allyship is to use privilege when appropriate to call out injustice – no one wants to make people feel bad for existing. Social justice exists to create equal opportunities for everyone, not enforce white guilt.

    “We highlight how systems inequitably distribute power to some while withholding it from others – based on who we are. We refer to people who are granted disproportionate power as ‘privileged,’ ‘majoritized,’ ‘centered,’ etc. And those from whom power is withheld as ‘oppressed,’ ‘minoritized,’ ‘marginalized,’ ect. Now, nobody is only one of those two. We’re both, depending on which situation we’re in, and what dimensions of ourselves are brought to the forefront.”

    – “The Social Justice Power Inverse,” It’s Pronounced Metrosexual/Sam Killermann

    Wheel of power and privilege, which shows identities based on factors like sexuality, body size, housing, citizenship status, and skin color on a spectrum of power.
    The graphic is a great visual to frame privilege since it places various identities on a spectrum of power. With every identity that exists in the world, there’s one that is valued as superior and one that is seen as inferior. Consider your fluency in English – as one of the most dominant languages in the world, being a native speaker gives you unearned advantages in the English-speaking world. Non-native English speakers have relative privilege – they had the opportunity to learn English, setting them above non-speakers but under native English speakers. Individuals who don’t speak fluent English are the most marginalized and have difficulty navigating an English-dominant world like the United States.

    Remember privilege is based on identity – someone might be marginalized because they’re Black, but privileged because they hold US citizenship by birth and identify as straight. There’s privilege based on disability, wealth, housing status, body size, sexual orientation, gender identity, language, citizenship, education level, race, ethnicity, religion, etc. If you’re still having difficulty understanding privilege, this comic does a great job illustrating it.


    The Theory of Intersectionality

    Make sure you thoroughly understand identity markers before tackling intersectionality – it’s easy to get lost. When people traditionally talk about oppression, they do so in vacuums – like -isms happen separately from one another and aren’t connected. Intersectionality is the belief that oppressions are all connected and people can have very different experiences based on how their personal identities intersect. The word “intersectionality” comes from the idea of a traffic intersection as a metaphor for oppression.

    Graphic illustrating the metaphor of intersectionality as a traffic intersection. Mark is impacted by racism as a Black man, but he benefits from sexism. Deborah is harmed by sexism but as a white woman, she benefits from racism. Michelle is a Black woman and therefore harmed by both racism and sexism.
    Our lives are shaped by our identities and relationships, which combine to create a very individual experience of the world, oppression, and privilege. Out of the 108 billion humans that have ever existed, there has likely never been a person exactly like you with the same combination. The following video is Kimberlรฉ Crenshaw’s “The Urgency of Intersectionality,” which launched the theory of intersectionality out of academia and into the public consciousness.

    Crenshaw uses the experiences of Black women in America to explain intersectionality – Emma DeGraffenreid was a real Black woman who was denied employment solely because she was a Black woman, but without intersectionality, she had no way to defend that claim.

    DeGraffenreid attempted to work at General Motors, which did hire both Black and white workers – so DeGraffenreid wasn’t able to claim the discrimination was fueled only by racism. And General Motors hired women, so she wasn’t able to argue their decision was out of sexism. In reality, General Motors was using a combination of both racism and sexism simultaneously: the only Black workers hired by General Motors were men used for industrial and maintenance jobs, and the only women hired were white and worked secretarial and front-office jobs. It’s only when both of those facts are combined that you understand the lens of intersectionality – how the combination of one’s identities creates nuanced and individual experiences of oppression.

    This theory can be applied across all identity markers and oppressions. Visualize three people in your head: one queer but financially well-off man named James, one straight but poor man named Devon, and one queer and poor man named Julio. Using intersectionality to just evaluate their experiences across classism and heterosexism, you can see the different struggles James, Devon, and Julio have. Devon might be lower class, but he isn’t targeted for his sexual orientation; James might be gay but he has plenty of money and resources. At the intersection of classism and heterosexism, Julio is affected by both being queer and poor – he’s less likely to get jobs, be approved by welfare programs, or even be accepted into housing due to his sexuality and wealth status. He likely has a greater barrier to HIV prevention and treatment and he’s unable to file lawsuits if he’s treated poorly.

    Additionally, intersectionality also believes all oppressions are connected. Fascism doesn’t happen in a vacuum – there’s a reason why racists are almost always sexists and homophobes. Oppression exists to benefit those in power, whether it’s directly creating profit or simply maintaining the societal system that keeps people from rising up against them. The systems that spread sexism use the same formula as the systems that spread transphobia. Due to this, allyship and activism require us to be committed to combating ALL oppressions – not just the ones that directly impact you. It’s impossible to fully get rid of sexism if you align yourself with transphobia, especially since so much of the ideology underneath transphobia is inherently sexist. You won’t be able to eliminate racism from society without also coming to terms with queer rights and income inequality. At the end of the day, remember: Nazis want to get rid of everyone, it’s just a matter of when.


    Allyship Resources

    GENERAL ALLYSHIP
    Creative Equity Toolkit @ creativeequitytoolkit.org / Dozens of toolkits and self-guided lesson plans to teach yourself about allyship, equity, diversity, and inclusion – all provided for free through Diversity Arts Australia and The British Council.
    GLSEN @ glsen.org / LGBTQIA+ organization that centers on the rights of queer youth and GSAs (Gay-Straight or Gender-Sexuality Alliances) – one of their regular national events is Ally/Solidarity Week, which includes a ton of information aimed to teach others about social justice.
    Guide to Allyship @ guidetoallyship.com / A fantastic open-source starter that introduces you to many of the fundamentals of allyship, similar to this guide at the Trans Solidarity Project.
    Human Rights Campaign (HRC) @ hrc.org / One of the largest LGBTQIA+ organizations in the world, dating back to 1980. They constantly produce resources and info guides, which cover topics like general allyship to trans issues.
    It’s Pronounced Metrosexual @ itspronouncedmetrosexual.com / Free online resource hub meant to make all things social justice, gender, and sexuality-related easy to understand.
    Learning For Justice @ learningforjustice.org / Education space that works through the Southern Poverty Law Center to teach people through their online resources and pivot them towards building an inclusive, multiracial democracy for all of our futures.
    Movement Advancement Project @ lgbtmap.org / Nonprofit think tank that regularly creates infographics and resources on LGBTQIA+ rights and other social justice issues.
    Out & Equal @ outandequal.org / LGBTQIA+ organization that largely interacts with high-level businesses and corporations – that also creates toolkits, resources, and guides (most of which are free).
    PFLAG @ pflag.org / One of the United States’ biggest ally organizations, which provides support, educational material, and advocacy for both LGBTQIA+ people and those who love them.
    Social Justice Books @ socialjusticebooks.org / Literature resource that gives great recommendations for social justice and allyship-themed books.
    Straight for Equality @ straightforequality.org / A program operated by PFLAG that serves as a national outreach and education hub for anyone interested in learning more about LGBTQIA+ allyship.
    The Safe Zone Project @ thesafezoneproject.com / Another free online resource that includes introductory curricula, activities, and other resources for all. Co-written by the same author as It’s Pronounced Metrosexual.
    The Trevor Project @ thetrevorproject.org / A crisis and suicide prevention organization for LGBTQIA+ youth that also creates free guides and resources on allyship.

    BISEXUAL+ ALLYSHIP
    American Institute of Bisexuality @ bisexuality.org / Operates a wealth of programs meant to educate both the general public as well as civic and professional organizations on bisexuality.
    Bi Foundation @ bi.org / Private foundation through the American Institute of Bisexuality that promotes understanding of bisexual+ topics, offering a large selection of articles and resources to choose from.
    Bi History @ bihistory.wordpress.com /
    Just like the rest of the LGBTQIA+ community, bisexuality dates back as far back as humanity – and Bi History is a great place to start learning about queer history.
    Bi Resource Center @ biresource.org /
    Organization that seeks to connect the bisexual+ community around the globe, and also provides plenty of resources in their info section.
    Bisexual Organizing Project @ bisexualorganizingproject.org /
    Resources offered by BOP, a group committed to building organizing skills among the bi+ community.
    Bi Survivors Network @ bisurvivorsnetwork.org /
    Regular chats and support provided by bi+ survivors for bi+ survivors.
    History of Pansexuality @ historyofpansexuality.carrd.co /
    Facts and information to learn if you’re interested in the long history behind pansexuality.
    Human Rights Campaign (HRC) @ hrc.org /
    HRC also provides resources and information specific to the bi+ community via their website.
    Queer Majority @ queermajority.com / Worldwide magazine that produces information, guidance, and critique on queerness.
    Still Bisexual @ stillbi.org /
    Advocacy organization that uses education and storytelling to foster public acceptance of bisexual+ identities.
    Teen Vogue @ teenvogue.com /

    The Trevor Project @ thetrevorproject.org /
    In addition to general allyship guides, The Trevor Project also has information centered on bisexuality – which explains the details of queerness, bisexuality, pansexuality, and similar identities along the spectrum.
    Unicorn @ unicornzine.com /
    LGBTQIA+ magazine that focuses on bisexual+ stories and information.

    TRANSGENDER ALLYSHIP
    Advocates for Trans Equality @ transequality.org / Legal rights organization formerly known as the National Center for Transgender Equality and Transgender Legal Defense and Education Fund. Provides a variety of legal-based resources and information about trans identities.
    Human Rights Campaign (HRC) @ hrc.org /
    Additional resources and guidance by HRC about transgender allyship.
    It’s Pronounced Metrosexual @ itspronouncedmetrosexual.com /
    Free online resource hub, most of which covers gender-related allyship.
    Neopronouns @ neopronounss.carrd.co /
    General starting point for both common pronouns and less common neopronouns.
    PFLAG @ pflag.org /
    Educational materials, resources, and support on transgender and nonbinary issues through one of the largest allyship organizations in the United States.
    Pronouns @ pronouns.org /
    Practical resource on the basics of pronouns and how they’re used.
    Terrence Higgins Trust @ tht.org.uk /
    Health organization based in the United Kingdom that offers free sources and education on trans-related issues.
    The Proud Trust @ theproudtrust.org /
    LGBTQIA+ youth charity with free information for both adults and young people.
    The Trevor Project @ thetrevorproject.org /
    Resource hub on transgender identities, pronouns, and everything else related to supporting trans people.
    Trans Lifeline @ translifeline.org /
    Crisis hotline for transgender individuals that also provides trans-specific resources.
    Trans Student Educational Resources @ transstudent.org /
    Allyship and resource website with information on gender, pronouns, and basic trans allyship.
    Trans What? @ transwhat.org /
    Starter guide that explains the basics of trans identity to those completely new to the field.

    INTERSEX ALLYSHIP
    4Intersex @ 4intersex.org /
    Learn the basics of intersex allyship and human rights through #4Intersex, a project of interACT Advocates.
    A Gender Agenda @ genderrights.org.au /
    Australian organization that provides free resources online in addition to supporting intersex, transgender, and nonbinary individuals in Australia.
    Human Rights Campaign (HRC) @ hrc.org /
    Curated information and intersex resources by HRC, one of the largest LGBTQIA+ organizations in the world.
    interACT @ interactadvocates.org /
    Social justice group that empowers intersex youth through advocacy, public engagement, and community connection – interACT also offers a large selection of intersex resources and guides.
    Intersex Campaign for Equality @ intersexequality.com /
    Originally known as the United States branch of Organisation Intersex International, IC4E has grown to lead the fight for intersex human rights and creates educational materials for those interested in supporting intersex identities.
    Intersex Day Project @ intersexday.org /
    While the Intersex Day Project largely focuses on International Intersex Awareness Day and Intersex Day of Solidarity, IDP offers additional advice and references on intersex issues.
    Intersex Human Rights Australia @ ihra.org.au /
    National body in Australia that represents the needs of the intersex community, providing resources on allyship and bodily integrity.
    Intersex Initiative @ intersexinitiative.org /
    US-based organization that hosts a wide selection of basic intersex resources.
    Intersex Justice Project @ intersexjusticeproject.org / POC-led group that organizes resources for intersex-related protesting and justice.
    The Intersex Roadshow @ intersexroadshow.blogspot.com /
    Personal blog that details the real-life experiences of intersex writer Dr. Cary Gabriel Costello, offering advice and guidance on intersex allyship.

    ASEXUALITY ALLYSHIP
    Aromantic-Spectrum Union for Recognition, Education, and Advocacy @ aromanticism.org /
    Community and advocacy organization with a collection of resources about aromanticism.
    Asexuality Archive @ asexualityarchive.com /
    A collection of information and articles related to asexuality.
    Asexuality Visibility and Education Network @ asexuality.org /
    The world’s largest asexual community, which maintains a massive resource library on the asexuality spectrum.
    Demisexual Resource Center @ demisexuality.org /
    Informative website that covers demisexual questions and advice.
    Human Rights Campaign (HRC) @ hrc.org /
    HRC’s introductory to asexual allyship, as well as graysexuality and demisexuality.
    The Ace and Aro Advocacy Project @ taaap.org /
    Asexual and aromantic resource-based organization that provides asexuality individuals with support in every aspect of life.
    The Asexuality Handbook @ asexuality-handbook.com /
    Free guide that explains the basics of asexuality for beginners, meant to be understandable, deep, and well-referenced. Free guide that explains the basics of asexuality for beginners, meant to be understandable, deep, and well-referenced.

    QUEER PEOPLE OF COLOR ALLYSHIP
    African American Chronicles @ blackhistory.psu.edu /
    Collection of Black history and stories meant to fill the gaps in traditional education and allyship.
    Anti-Oppression Network @ theantioppressionnetwork.com /
    Online collection of resources to support grassroots allyship and activism for Indigenous Americans.
    Black Queer & Intersectional Collective @ bqic.net /
    Grassroots community organization that facilitates resources and zines for QTPOC allyship.
    Healthy Native Youth @ healthynativeyouth.org /
    Native-centered health and resources materials offered for free through their toolbox.
    Human Rights Campaign (HRC) @ hrc.org /
    Directory on several resource hubs through HRC about best practices on supporting communities of color.
    National Queer Asian Pacific Islander Alliance @ nqapia.org /
    LGBTQIA+ AAPI organization that works to develop resources to support and represent queer Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders.
    Native Appropriations @ nativeappropriations.com /
    Virtual forum that discusses Indigenous representations, stereotypes, cultural appropriations, news, and activism.
    Reclaiming Native Truth @ rnt.firstnations.org /
    National project to foster cultural, social, and policy change that empowers Native Americans.
    The Guide to Allyship @ guidetoallyship.com /
    A fantastic open-source starter that introduces you to many of the fundamentals of allyship, similar to this guide at the Trans Solidarity Project. Most of the topics listed within the guide are geared with Black allyship in mind.
    This is Indian Country @ thisisindiancountry.com /
    Movement organized by the American Indian College Fund to raise awareness about Indigenous lives and history.
    White Supremacy Culture @ whitesupremacyculture.info /
    Online and most current version of the original “White Supremacy Culture” from 1999, alongside resources and additional learning tools to continue your allyship.

  • HIV Resources

    HIV Resources

    More than one million people in the United States have HIV, and thousands will die from AIDS-related complications this year alone. Read on relevant hotlines and the resource directory here.

    HIV MYTHBUSTING

    Myth #1: Only gay men can get HIV.

    Although men who have sex with men have historically had higher infection rates, anyone can become infected with HIV – in fact, a growing number of new cases in the United States are heterosexual.

    Myth #2: I’d know if I had HIV.

    Most people with HIV don’t experience major symptoms, and you can’t tell someone has HIV just by the way they look. 1 in 7 people with HIV don’t even know – which is why it’s important to get tested regularly, especially if you engage with higher risk behaviors like being sexually active or using injectable drugs.

    Myth #3: HIV will kill you.

    As long as you take your prescribed medication, people with HIV can (and do) live long, healthy lives just like everyone else. HIV only becomes deadly when left undiagnosed and/or untreated.

    Myth #4: It’s OK to have unprotected sex if both partners have HIV.

    Unprotected sex is still risky, even if all partners involved have HIV. This is because you can still get other STDs like chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis – and even other strains of HIV.

    Myth #5: Birth control prevents HIV.

    Condoms and medications like PEP and PrEP are the only way to prevent HIV – birth control methods like the pill, IUDs, and implants do NOT prevent HIV or other STDs.

    Myth #6: PrEP, PEP, and other medications are too expensive for me.

    Many US states and Canadian provinces cover PEP and PrEP for free or have assistance programs to make them free/affordable. Check your region’s laws for detailed information or visit PrEPMAP.


    What’s the difference between HIV and AIDS?

    Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) is the final and most severe stage of HIV if unmanaged, which occurs when the body’s immune system is badly damaged because of the virus. In the United States, most people with HIV do NOT develop AIDS because taking HIV medicine as prescribed stops the progression of the disease.


    How is HIV transmitted?

    You can only get HIV by coming into contact with certain bodily fluids from a person with HIV who has a detectable viral load. These fluids are blood, semen (also known as cum), pre-seminal fluid (pre-cum), rectal fluids, vaginal fluids, and breast milk.

    “Viral load” refers to the amount of HIV someone has, essentially. A detectable viral load means they have more than 200 copies of the human immunodeficiency virus per milliliter of blood, which means they will show up on an HIV test and can transmit HIV to others.

    In contrast, an undetectable viral load is when someone has fewer than 200 copies per milliliter – and people with an undetectable viral load have a “zero risk,” “effectively no risk,” or “one percent or less” chance of transmitting HIV to other people even without regular precautions like condoms, PEP, or PrEP. You achieve an undetectable viral load by taking your prescribed antiretroviral therapy medication regularly.

    HIV can not be spread by kisses, hugs, or sharing food. Some behaviors that put you at a higher risk of getting HIV include anal and vaginal sex and sharing needles, while things like kissing and oral sex have a statistically nonsignificant chance of transmitting the virus.

    The only way HIV is transmitted from open-mouth kissing or biting is if both partners have broken skin since HIV is a bloodborne pathogen – which is why it’s extremely rare and considered little/no risk by the CDC. Lastly, while having other STD/STIs or alcohol/drug use doesn’t necessarily increase the risk of getting HIV, they’re risky behaviors that generally correlate with increased HIV transmission.

    via US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Use the HIV Risk Reduction Tool to learn about your risk for HIV based on behaviors and practices.

    Can I prevent HIV?

    Yes! There are more tools than ever to prevent HIV. By learning methods to prevent HIV transmission, you’re taking the first step to helping end the HIV epidemic. Some methods to prevent HIV transmission include taking PEP (post-exposure prophylaxis) or PrEP (pre-exposure prophylaxis), limiting needle and drug equipment sharing, getting regularly tested, etc. For US readers, visit HIV.gov for official HIV-related care and prevention providers.

    Post-exposure prophylaxis, aka PEP, is an anti-HIV drug that is started within 72 hours after possible exposure to HIV. It’s used in emergencies, like having a condom break during sex or sexual assault. PEP is taken for 28 days, and followed up with additional testing and labs for 3 months – and it’s more effective the sooner it’s taken after possible infection. In comparison to PrEP, PEP is like a “Plan B” for HIV meant for emergencies.

    Pre-exposure prophylaxis, or PrEP, is an anti-HIV prevention drug that becomes effective after seven days of use. Unlike PEP, PrEP is best for individuals who have regular HIV risk, like people who have casual hookups, share needles, or don’t consistently use condoms. When taken correctly, PrEP reduces the risk of getting HIV from sex by 99% and reduces the risk of getting HIV from sharing needles by 74%. As a metaphor, PrEP is similar to birth control and prevents HIV long-term like how the birth control pill prevents pregnancy. US readers can use the PrEP Locator to find PrEP providers nationwide, and NASTAD has information about whether non-providers (like pharmacies) can prescribe PrEP based on state or territory.


    Who is at risk for HIV?

    Anyone can get HIV since HIV can affect anyone regardless of sexual orientation, gender, race, ethnicity, age, or where they live. However, certain groups of people in the United States are more likely to get HIV than others because of particular factors.

    According to the CDC…

    • The majority of new HIV diagnoses occur in the US South, in comparison to other regions like the Midwest, Northeast, West, etc. Nearly half of all new cases in the United States come from the South, while the Midwest and Northeast have the lowest rate of new diagnoses.
    • Men who have sex with men (MSM, queer men, bi+ men, and so on) account for 67% of new cases. 22% of cases happen from straight or heterosexual sex today.
    • 7% of new HIV diagnoses come from people who inject drugs and share needles.
    • HIV disproportionately affects communities of color, too – 37% of new diagnoses are Black and 33% are Latine.
    • Most new HIV cases come from people between the ages of 25 to 34, and the second highest age group was those 24 and under – who made up 20% of new diagnoses in 2022.

    How can I tell if I have HIV?

    The only way to know for sure that you have HIV is to get tested. Despite what some may think, you can’t “tell” if someone has HIV just by looking at them and most people with HIV don’t experience major symptoms. 1 in 7 people with HIV don’t even know they have it – which is why testing is so important. While it may be scary to get tested for HIV, HIV is not a death sentence – people living with HIV can have long, healthy lives just like people without HIV as long as they get connected with the tools and medications needed to keep their HIV managed. For US readers, visit HIV.gov for official HIV-related care and prevention providers.

    The history of HIV/AIDS, via UNAIDS 2021.

    How do I get tested for HIV?

    Getting tested for HIV is just as important as getting a regular check-up – people can only start HIV treatment if they know they are living with the virus. The earlier someone is properly diagnosed with HIV, the earlier they can begin life-saving treatment to manage their HIV. People can (and do) live long and healthy lives with early HIV detection.

    Remember: the only way to know for sure that you have HIV is to get tested. A substantial amount of people with HIV report having no symptoms – especially since the majority of symptoms early on in HIV infection are similar to the common flu. The CDC recommends everyone should be tested for HIV at least once in their lives, while individuals with additional risk factors (ex. queer or bi+ men, sex workers, people who share needles) should get tested at least once a year. Most people aren’t recommended to get tested every three to six months unless they’re at extreme risk for HIV. Getting tested is important in ending the spread of HIV, keeping people living with HIV safe and healthy, and protecting those you love from contracting HIV.

    There are three types of HIV tests, which use either blood, oral fluid/saliva, or urine. HIV tests look for antibodies and antigens that your body will only produce if you have the human immunodeficiency virus – but it takes time for bodies to begin developing the antibodies and antigens after being infected, which is why there’s a window period between contracting HIV and when it’ll show up on tests. Some tests have smaller windows than others. The three types of HIV tests are…

    • ANTIBODY TESTS, which only check for HIV antibodies in your blood or oral/saliva sample. The majority of rapid HIV tests are antibody tests, as well as the only version of HIV self-tests approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. As a general rule, antibody tests that use blood from a vein have a smaller detection window than those that use saliva or blood from a finger stick.
    • ANTIGEN/ANTIBODY TESTS, which looks for both HIV antibodies and antigens in the blood. Antigens are a protein of the virus and show up much faster than antibodies, and antigen/antibody tests are the most common type of HIV test done in US labs.
    • NUCLEIC ACID TESTS, also known as NATs or viral load tests, detect the amount of HIV present in someone’s blood – which is useful for monitoring the virus. NATs can detect HIV as soon as 10 to 33 days after infection, but they’re more expensive than antibody tests or antigen/antibody tests – so they’re used for monitoring HIV treatment more than they’re used for general testing and screening.

    HIV tests are widely available, and it’s your choice whether you’d prefer to go directly to your normal doctor or healthcare provider – or if you’d rather get tested at a hospital, medical clinic, substance use program, or community health center. Visit gettested.cdc.gov to find an HIV testing site near you. And if going IRL isn’t your style, there are also approved HIV tests you can do on your own at home or mail-in. Rapid self-tests give your full results in roughly 20 minutes, while mail-in self-tests are later mailed to a healthcare provider for greater accuracy. Together TakeMeHome is a program under the CDC to provide free rapid self-tests to anyone at least 17 years old in the United States.

    WHAT HAPPENS IF I TEST POSITIVE?
    Your at-home or rapid self-test is positive if you have two complete lines – one next to the “C” and another (even a faint line) next to the “T.” The presence of two lines means you may have HIV, and there are a lot of next steps – but first, take a deep breath and remember: you are not alone; medical treatments are available to help people live long, healthy lives; and having HIV does not mean that you have or will get AIDS. Learning that you may have HIV can be distressing, which is why OraQuick has a toll-free support line at 866-436-6527.

    A clinic or healthcare provider will have to confirm your results, so you should visit a healthcare professional as soon as possible. If your results are confirmed, you’ll be give resources and information about HIV medication, treatment, and management, as well as counseling, case management, and connections to HIV support organizations and tools. Healthcare workers are duty-bound to keep all your medical information confidential unless you give them explicit permission to share it – so no one (including your family or workplace) needs to know about your test or your test results.

    WHAT HAPPENS IF I TEST NEGATIVE?
    Your at-home or rapid self-test is negative if you have one complete line – right next to the “C.” To be negative, there should be no line (however faint) next to the “T.” If your result is negative and it’s been at least three months since your possible HIV exposure, you likely do not have HIV. Continue to maintain healthy and safe sexual habits like condoms and PrEP, and get tested as needed.

    Remember that a negative at-home or self-test does not mean that you are not infected with HIV. Due to the window of time that it takes for HIV tests to detect HIV via antibodies and antigens, it’s possible to get a false negative HIV test.


    What are my rights regarding HIV?

    Rights for individuals living with HIV vary drastically depending on where you live in the world. Due to stigma, people with HIV are discriminated against at work, at home, and at the doctor’s office – knowing your rights is the first step in defending them.

    In the United States, all individuals with HIV are protected by the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, which is enforced by the Department of Health and Human Services and the Office for Civil Rights. These laws prohibit any anti-HIV discrimination by healthcare and human services agencies that receive federal funding, as well as any discrimination by state or local governments – including services, activities, or programs provided by state or local governments. Anyone can file a report with the Office for Civil Rights online or by mail.

    While many US states and territories require you to disclose your HIV status, you’re only required to disclose it to certain people. At the time of this article, thirteen states require you to disclose your status to potential sexual partners, while four require disclosure to anyone you share a needle with. Depending on the state, failure to disclose status can lead to life in prison. You do not have to disclose to anyone else – including your family or friends. While most American employers have the right to ask about your health in certain fields, you don’t have to disclose to your workplace in most cases. The Americans with Disabilities Act protects you from anti-HIV discrimination – which means hiring managers can’t ask you about your health and companies have to make reasonable adjustments as needed.

    The Fair Housing Act makes anti-HIV discrimination in US renting and housing entirely illegal. No one can be legally denied housing, harassed, or evicted due to HIV status.

    Also at the time of this article, people living with HIV cannot be denied healthcare in the United States. Healthcare insurance must cover pre-existing conditions like HIV and cannot cancel your policy because of a new diagnosis. The Affordable Care Act (also known as Obamacare) prohibits such discrimination within healthcare, and HIV medications, lab tests, and counseling have to be covered.


    HIV-Related Care Hotlines

    GLOBAL
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ณ AIDS Healthcare Foundation @ aidshealth.org / 323-860-5200 / International nonprofit based in Los Angeles that operates a network of HIV services in over 40 countries across Latin America, Africa, Asia, and Europe.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ณ International Planned Parenthood Federation @ ippf.org / 202-987-9364 / Global healthcare provider that has been a leader in sexual and reproductive health for all since 1952.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ณ UNAIDS @ unaids.org / 41-22-595-59-92 / International agency that seeks to end AIDS as a public health threat by 2030 and has operated since 1996 to assist the United Nations in combating HIV and AIDS.

    NORTH AMERICA
    ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Canadian AIDS Treatment Information Exchange @ catie.ca / 416-203-7122 / The primary national information and resource center on HIV, Hepatitis C, and substance misuse in Canada.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ CDC-INFO @ cdc.gov / 800-232-4626 / Live support to help Americans find the latest and reliable science-based health information, including CDC guidance and resources.
    ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ HIV and Sexual Health Infoline Canada @ sexualhealthontario.ca / 800-668-2437 / Free anonymous telephone and instant message service available in English and French on sexual health topics. Advice and counseling can be available for any Canadian resident, although services are specified for Ontario.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ HIV/AIDS/Hepatitis C Nightline / 800-273-2437 / US hotline providing support for people living with HIV or Hepatitis C as well as their caregivers.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ HIV Management Warmline / 800-933-3413 / Non-emergency telephone service for questions about HIV, antiretroviral therapy, HIV clinical trials, and laboratory evaluation in the United States.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ LGBT National Help Center @ lgbthotline.org / 888-843-4564 / Free and confidential peer-support, information, and local resources where volunteers help connect you to other groups and services in the US. Also maintains a coming out hotline, youth talkline, and senior hotline.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ National AIDS Hotline / 800-243-2437 / Federal hotline to refer the general American public to relevant state and local resources.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project @ natap.org / 212-219-0106 / Nonprofit corporations in the United States that educates individuals on HIV treatments on the local, national, and international level.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ National Clinician Consultation Center @ nccc.ucsf.edu / 833-622-2463 / Teleconsultation resource that educates US healthcare providers with information and answers on HIV and Hepatitis C.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ NIH Office of AIDS Research @ hivinfo.nih.gov / 800-448-0440 / Confidential answers to questions on HIV/AIDS clinical trials and treatment in the United States.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ PEPline / 888-448-4911 / Hotline for individuals interested in information about PEP, especially those who have been possibly exposed to HIV while on the job in the United States.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Perinatal HIV Hotline / 888-448-8765 / Resource hotline available 24/7 in the United States for pregnant people living with HIV to find answers and tools.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ PrEPline / 855-448-7737 / Hotline about how to start, continue, or manage use of PrEP for HIV within the US.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ SAGE x HearMe @ sageusa.org / The United Statesโ€™ largest and oldest organization dedicated to improving the lives of LGBTQIA+ older people. SAGE now offers supportive services and resources through the SAGE x HearMe app, formerly known as the SAGE LGBTQ Elder Hotline.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ The Trevor Project @ thetrevorproject.org / 866-488-7386 / The leading suicide prevention and crisis intervention organization centered on LGBTQIA+ young people in the United States. Offers 24/7/365 information and support to those ages 13 to 24 with trained counselors via call, text, or instant message.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ณ Trans Lifeline @ translifeline.org / 877-565-8860 / Transgender-centered crisis organization that does not use involuntary intervention/forced hospitalization to provide support to transgender people through fully anonymous and confidential calls within the United States and Canada.

    LATIN AMERICA
    ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ฒ National HIV/STI Helpline @ hstu.moh.gov.jm / 876-536-9141 / Program under the Ministry of Health and government of Jamaica to implement and support HIV/AIDS response in the nation.

    EUROPE
    ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช AIDS-Hilfe Helpline @ aidshilfe.de / 0180-33-19411 / Telephone counseling provided via the telephone that answer provides information in Germany on HIV/AIDS.
    ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ HIV Hotline @ ัั‚ะพะฟะฒะธั‡ัะฟะธะด.ั€ั„ / 8-800-555-49-43 / Hotline operated in conjunction with Russia’s STOP HIV/AIDS campaign to answer questions about HIV.
    ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Sida Info Service @ sida-info-service.org / 0-800-840-800 / Free confidential telephone service for anyone in mainland France or in affiliated overseas departments to get information regarding HIV. Callers from outside France should dial 00-31-1-41-83-42-77.
    ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Terrence Higgins Trust @ tht.org.uk / 0808-802-1221 / Telephone and live chat service for individuals residing in the United Kingdom seeking support and information about HIV.

    ASIA
    ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ AIDS Hotline / 852-2780-2211 / Counseling staffed by trained nurses for information about HIV and testing in Hong Kong.
    ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ AIDS Task Force @ aidsisrael.org.il / 03-5619900 / Telephone and WhatsApp service for individuals in Israel seeking support and resources about HIV and AIDS.
    ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Gay Men HIV Testing Hotline / 852-21171069 / Free anonymous and confidential HIV testing service provided in Hong Kong by appointment and telephone.
    ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ HIV Hotline @ ัั‚ะพะฟะฒะธั‡ัะฟะธะด.ั€ั„ / 8-800-555-49-43 / Hotline operated in conjunction with Russia’s STOP HIV/AIDS campaign to answer questions about HIV.
    ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ National AIDS Control Organization Helpline @ naco.gov.in / 1097 / National Indian helpline that provides counseling and awareness on HIV/AIDS prevention, treatment, and education.
    ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ National HIV and AIDS Hotline @ pnac.doh.gov.ph / 02-8651-7800 / National telephone support line for HIV and AIDS information in the Philippines, provided by the Department of Health and Philippine National AIDS Council.
    ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท Positive Living Association @ pozitifyasam.org / 0216-418-10-61 / Support line in Tรผrkiye to make up-to-date information about HIV accessible and connect people with relevant testing and prevention services.

    AFRICA
    ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฌ AIDS Helpline / 234-01-772-2200 / Toll-free hotline system for accurate and up-to-date information about HIV/AIDS in Nigeria.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฌ AIDS Information Centre @ aicug.org / 256-39-3101893 / Healthcare network that leads HIV/AIDS treatment, prevention, and counseling throughout Uganda.
    ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ National AIDS Helpline @ lifelinesa.co.za / 0800-012-322 / Emotional support counseling for HIV/AIDS in South Africa.
    ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ช National HIV and AIDS Helpline @ nhcsc.nascop.org / 0726-460-000 / Hotline operated by the National HIV Clinical Support Center to advise individuals in Kenya about HIV/AIDS.

    OCEANIA
    ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Burnett Foundation @ burnettfoundation.org.nz / Free and confidential counseling for people living or affected by HIV in New Zealand, available by appointment.
    ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ National HIV/AIDS Information Line / 1800-451-624 / Advice line that connects individuals to qualified sexual health nurses in Australia for confidential information about HIV, operated by the Sexual Health Info Link.


    HIV & AIDS Resources

    GLOBAL
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ณ Global Network of People Living with HIV @ gnpplus.net / Network operated by people living with HIV for people living with HIV, regardless of geographic location.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ณ International AIDS Society @ iasociety.org / Research-based organization that develops holistic approaches to HIV/AIDS treatment and prevention.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ณ International Planned Parenthood Federation @ ippf.org / Global healthcare provider that has been a leader in sexual and reproductive health for all since 1952.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ณ The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria @ theglobalfund.org / Worldwide partnership to combat HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria and create healthy, safe, and equitable communities.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ณ UNAIDS @ unaids.org / International agency that seeks to end AIDS as a public health threat by 2030 and has operated since 1996 to assist the United Nations in combating HIV and AIDS.

    NORTH AMERICA
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ AIDS Drug Assistance Program@ adap.directory / Patient-centric project that provides HIV-related services and prescription medication to hundreds of thousands of people in the United States by linking individuals with their local state or territory agency.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Asian Pacific AIDS Intervention Team @ apaitssg.org / Grassroots AIDS service organization centered on Asian and Pacific Islanders with HIV, based in the United States.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Bienestar Human Services @ bienestar.org / US community-based social services organization that caters to Latino Americans living with HIV, especially LGBTQIA+ Latino Americans.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Black AIDS Institute @ blackaids.org / Think tank that aims to end the HIV/AIDS epidemic in the Black American community through awareness messaging, information, and robust programs.
    ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Canadian Aboriginal AIDS Network @ caan.ca / Agency in Canada that provides resources and tools to Indigenous and Aboriginal Canadians.
    ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Canadian AIDS Society @ cdnaids.ca / Grassroots network that leads community-based HIV/AIDS resources in Canada.
    ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Canadian AIDS Treatment Information Exchange @ catie.ca / The primary national information and resource center on HIV, Hepatitis C, and substance misuse in Canada.
    ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network @ hivlegalnetwork.ca / Network that promotes the human rights of people living with HIV/AIDS across Canada, which includes legal representation and legislation advisement.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ HIV. GOV @ hiv.gov / Offers information about HIV/AIDS prevention, treatment, and resources for anyone in the United States.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ HIV.GOV Service Locator @ locator.hiv.gov / Location-based search tool managed by the United States Department of Health and Human Services to allow anyone to find local HIV testing services, housing providers, health centers, PrEP, PEP, and other related needs.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Latino Commission on AIDS @ latinoaids.org / Nonprofit organization in response to the critical unmet need for HIV prevention, treatment, and education in the Latino community in the United States.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ National Minority AIDS Council @ nmac.org / Advocacy nonprofit that provides training and resources catered to marginalized communities in the United States.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ National Native HIV Network @ nnhn.org / Indigenous-led network that mobilizes American Indians, Indigenous Americans, Alaska Natives, and Native Hawaiians towards community action.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Positively Trans @ transgenderlawcenter.org / Program through the Transgender Law Center to support transgender people living with HIV in the United States.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Positive Women’s Network @ pwn-usa.org / Advocacy and resource organization for women living with HIV.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program @ ryanwhite.hrsa.gov / National services and resources for low-income individuals living with HIV in the US.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ TheBody.com Hotline @ thebody.com / News site based in New York that centers on publishing HIV-related information.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ The Well Project @ thewellproject.org / United States nonprofit that primarily supports women and girls living with HIV/AIDS.

    LATIN AMERICA
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ณ RedLA+ @ redlactrans.org / Network of organizations that focus on transgender people throughout Latin America, especially those who are living with HIV.

    EUROPE
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ณ AIDS Action Europe @ aidsactioneurope.org / Regional network of over 370 NGOs, national networks, and community-based groups to support legislation related to HIV/AIDS in 47 different countries.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ณ European AIDS Treatment Group @ eatg.org / Advocacy and research organization that responds to and develops HIV/AIDS-related initiatives.
    ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง National AIDS Trust @ nat.org.uk / The primary HIV rights charity in the United Kingdom.

    ASIA
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ณ Asia Pacific Network of People Living with HIV @ apnplus.org / Peer-led organization that improves the quality of life for people living with HIV/AIDS in the Asia Pacific region.
    ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ India HIV/AIDS Alliance @ allianceindia.org / Non-governmental organization that partners with various civic society, government, and community groups to support HIV prevention and treatment programs.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ณ Middle East and North Africa Harm Reduction Association @ menahra.org / Network of HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment organizations in 20 different countries across the Middle East and Northern Africa.
    ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ MPlus Foundation @ mplusthailand.com / Community-based sexual health and rights organization based in Thailand that works to end HIV discrimination and transmission.
    ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Centre @ trcarc.org / Research organization and health clinic that serves individuals with HIV/AIDS in Thailand.

    AFRICA
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ณ African Network for the Care of Children Affected by HIV/AIDS @ anecca.org / Reproductive health organization that serves people living in Uganda, Burundi, Ethiopia, Nigeria, Malawi, Tanzania, and South Sudan.
    ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Desmond Tutu HIV Foundation @ desmondtutuhivfoundation.org.za / Health organization that partners with various international research groups to develop community programs in South Africa.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ณ Middle East and North Africa Harm Reduction Association @ menahra.org / Network of HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment organizations in 20 different countries across the Middle East and Northern Africa.
    ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Treatment Action Campaign @ tac.org.za / Civic society organization based in South Africa that leads campaigns centered on improved healthcare for people living with HIV/AIDS.

    OCEANIA
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ณ Australian Federation of AIDS Organizations @ healthequitymatters.org.au / Federation of HIV and LGBTQIA+ organizations in Australia and Oceania that provides policy expertise and resource support.
    ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Burnett Foundation @ burnettfoundation.org.nz / Formerly known as the New Zealand AIDS Foundation, the Burnett Foundation Aotearoa is a community-led response organization that tackles HIV throughout New Zealand.
    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ณ Pacific Sexual and Gender Diversity Network @ psgdn.org / Collective between the countries of Fiji, Samoa, and Tonga to advocate for the needs of people living with HIV, especially LGBTQIA+ people.

  • Elder Hotlines

    Seniors are integral members of their community and deserve equal rights, dignity, and opportunities. Read below for related hotlines and resources.

    International

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ณ AARP Resource Center @ aarp.org / 202-434-3525 / US-based organization that caters to adults ages 50 and older, providing tools, resources, and services for healthcare, community, and finances.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ณ HelpAge International @ helpage.org / 44-20-7278-7778 / Global nonprofit that works to improve the quality of life for older people across the globe in 98 different countries.

    North America

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ 211 @ 211.org / 211 / Referral and directory telephone service that connects callers with any/all resources that may be beneficial to their circumstance. 211 is available both in the entirety of the United States and Canada.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Alzheimer’s Association Helpline @ alz.org / 800-272-3900 / Voluntary health organization that focuses on Alzheimer’s disease care, support, and research in the United States.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ARCH National Respite Network @ archrespite.org / 703-256-2084 / US emergency care organization that provides services to children and adults with special needs.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Caregiver Action Network @ caregiveraction.org / 855-227-3640 / Leading family caregiver organization in the US that connects and supports Americans caring for loved ones.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Department of Aging @ hhs.gov / 877-696-6775 / Agency under the US Department of Health and Human Services to serve older adults.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ElderCare Locator @ eldercare.usaging.org / 800-677-1116 / Information and referral resource that connects older Americans with services, funded by the United States Administration on Aging.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Elder Protection Center @ elderprotectioncenter.com / 877-353-3780 / Online resource for older adults in the United States to combat abuse, scams, and neglect.

    ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Instituto Nacional de las Personas Adultas Mayores @ gob.mx / 55-50880247 / Decentralized public body under the Federal Public Administration to coordinate, promote, support, foster, monitor, and evaluate programs for older adults in Mexico.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Legal Services for Older Americans @ acl.gov / Program operated by the Administration for Community Living and United States Department of Health and Human Services to provide older adults with legal assistance regarding their rights.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Medicare Helpline @ medicare.gov / 800-633-4227 / 24/7 assistance and advice on Medicare usage and programs in the United States.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ National Adult Protective Services Association @ napsa-now.org / 202-370-6292 / National nonprofit that coordinates services with local law enforcement and policy to prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of older adults in the United States.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ National Domestic Violence Hotline @ thehotline.org / 800-799-7233 / Leading organization in the United States for empowering survivors of domestic violence and abuse.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ National Elder Fraud Hotline @ ovc.ojp.gov / 833-372-8311 / Free resource and hotline operated by the United States Department of Justice and Office for Victims of Crimes to report fraud targeted at adults ages 60 or older.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ National Indian Council on Aging @ nicoa.org / 505-292-2001 / United States nonprofit that focuses on the needs of aging Indigenous Americans, American Indians, and Alaska Natives.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Parkinson’s Foundation Helpline @ parkinson.org / 800-473-4636 / Telephone service for individuals with Parkinson’s disease as well as their families, friends, and healthcare providers to find out more information through their trained specialists.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ SAGE x HearMe @ sageusa.org / The United Statesโ€™ largest and oldest organization dedicated to improving the lives of LGBTQIA+ older people. SAGE now offers supportive services and resources through the SAGE x HearMe app, formerly known as the SAGE LGBTQ Elder Hotline.

    ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Seniors’ Safety Line @ ontario.ca / 866-299-1011 / Confidential and free telephone resource for elder referrals, information, and support in Canada.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Social Security Administration @ ssa.gov / Official agency of the United States government that administers welfare benefits such as retirement, disability, and Medicare.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ VA Benefits Hotline @ va.gov 800-827-1000 / General hotline and inquiries information about United States veterans benefits.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Veteranโ€™s Crisis Line @ veteranscrisisline.net / 988+1 / Crisis line for United States veterans operated by the national 988 suicide prevention hotline, specialized for serving veterans.

    South America

    ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Disque 100 @ gov.br / Human rights hotline through the government of Brazil to report violations and abuse of marginalized communities, including older adults.

    ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท PAMI Senior Support Line @ pami.org.ar / 138 / Social welfare organization in Argentina that provides comprehensive medical assistance to older adults and retirees.

    ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Servicio Nacional del Adulto Mayor @ senama.gob.cl / Official services provided by the government of Chile to support older adults.

    Europe

    ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท 3977 @ 3977.org / 3977 / System for alerting and preventing elder abuse in France.

    ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Age UK Advice Line @ ageuk.org.uk / 0800-678-1602 / Confidential national telephone service for older people in the United Kingdom, as well as their families, friends, caregivers, and professionals.

    ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช ร„ldrelinjen / 020-22-22-33 / Senior line for residents of Sweden needing someone to talk to for emotional support.

    ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช ALONE National Support Line @ alone.ie / 0818-222-024 / National organization in Ireland that improves the physical, emotional, and mental well-being of older people through their various services and information tools.

    ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Fundaciรณn Amigos de los Mayores @ amigosdelosmayores.org / 608-200-300 / Volunteery foundation in Spain that fights loneliness and social isolation among older people.

    ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Silbernetz @ silbernetz.org / 0800-4-70-80-90 / Social services provided to elders in Germany looking for support and resources.

    Asia

    ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท Korean Senior Welfare Helpline @ mohw.go.kr / 82-44-202-3471 / Telephone support through the Ministry of Health and Welfare in South Korea directed at older adults.

    Africa

    ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ AGE-in-Action @ age-in-action.co.za / 021-426-4249 / Originally known as the South African Council for the Aged, AGE-in-Action represents older people while protecting their interests and wellbeing.

    Oceania

    ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Age Concern New Zealand @ ageconcern.org.nz / 0800-65-2-105 / New Zealand charity that promotes the dignity, well-being, equity, and respect of adults over 65.

    ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Elder Abuse Helpline @ ag.gov.au / 1800-353-374 / Telephone number that automatically redirects users with local services regarding elder abuse in Australia.

    Feel like there’s a resource missing? Send national helplines our way and we’ll add ’em!

    This field is required.
  • Youth Hotlines

    Need a safe space to talk? The following organizations and resources are geared toward young people and their needs.

    International

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ณ 211 @ 211.org / 211 / Referral and directory telephone service that connects callers with any/all resources that may be beneficial to their circumstances. 211 is available both in the entirety of the United States and Canada.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ณ Childline @ childline.org.uk / 0800-1111 / International organization based in the United Kingdom that provides free confidential services over the internet and telephone.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ณ Crisis Text Line @ crisistextline.org / 741-741 / Global nonprofit that provides free confidential text-based mental health support and crisis intervention in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and Ireland. While Crisis Text Line often interacts with youth, there is no age requirement or cut-off to use their services.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ณ It Gets Better Project @ itgetsbetter.org / Nonprofit that serves to uplift, empower, and connect LGBTQIA+ young people around the world.

    North America

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Administration for Children & Families @ acf.hhs.gov / Official agency through the United States government that promotes the economic and social well-being of families, children, youth, individuals, and communities.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Big Brothers Big Sisters of America @ bbbs.org / 813-720-8778 / Mentorship program in the United States that connects young people with meaningful connections with their adult volunteers.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Boys Town @ boystown.org / 800-448-3000 / Housing and welfare agency for homeless youth and dysfunctional families in the United States.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Break the Cycle @ breakthecycle.org / US-based organization that provides young people with educational tools and resources to end abusive relationships and cycles.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Child Help USA National Child Abuse Hotline @ childhelphotline.org / 800-442-4453 / Network of counselors to support those concerned about child abuse via supportive listening, trauma-informed practices, and diversity in their crisis intervention.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ DoSomething @ dosomething.org / 212-254-2390 / US organization that empowers young people with the tools and resources to create change in their communities and the larger world.

    ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Kids Help Phone @ kidshelpphone.ca / 800-668-6868 / Anonymous e-support and telephone service for kids, teens, and young adults in Canada.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ LGBT National Youth Talkline @ lgbthotline.org / 800-246-7743 / Confidential telephone service for LGBTQIA+ young people ages 19 and younger in the United States.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ love is respect @ loveisrespect.org / 866-331-9474 / National resource to disrupt and prevent unhealthy relationships among young people in the United States as a project of the National Domestic Violence Hotline.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ National Center for Missing and Exploited Children @ missingkids.org / 800-843-5678 / Private nonprofit corporation that finds missing children and combats child victimization by working with families, victims, private industry, law enforcement, and the public.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ National Runaway Safeline 1800runaway.org / 800-786-2929 / National communications system for runaway and homeless youth in the United States, which caters to keeping young people as safe and healthy as possible in potentially dangerous situations.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Partnership to End Addiction @ย drugfree.orgย /ย 855-378-4373ย / Youth-focused addiction prevention and treatment organization that supports individuals with substance misuse issues and their families in the United States.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Polaris @ polarisproject.org / 888-373-7888 / Survivor-centered movement to end human trafficking, which operates and runs the National Human Trafficking Hotline and maintains the largest human trafficking dataset in North America.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Stop Bullying @ stopbullying.gov / United States agency that utilizes the Department of Education, Department of Health and Human Services, and Department of Justice to prevent and respond to bullying.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Stop It Now! @ stopitnow.org / 888-773-8368 / Program that provides free direct support and information regarding child sex abuse in the United States.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Teen Line @ teenline.org / 866-714-0090 / Anonymous and nonjudgmental space for teens in the United States to access peer-to-peer support, supervised by adult mental health professionals.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ The Trevor Project @ thetrevorproject.org / 866-488-7386 / Crisis service for LGBTQIA+ youth ages 13 to 24 in the United States.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ YouthLine @ theyouthline.org / 877-968-8491 / Free teen-to-teen crisis support available via telephone, text, online chat, and email in the United States.

    Europe

    ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท 119 @ allo119.gouv.fr / 119 / The national hotline for children in France to address the physical, legal, emotional, and social needs of youth.

    ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง HOPELineUK @ papyrus-uk.org / 0800-068-4141 / Confidential support and advice service that provides crisis counseling for youth ages 35 and under in the United Kingdom.

    ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Kinder-und Jugendtelefon / 116111 / Counseling nonprofit that provides support for children, young people, and parents in Germany.

    Asia

    ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Parent-Child Support Line / 2755-1122 / Telephone service operated by Action Against Abuse to serve children, parents, professionals, and the general public to investigate child abuse.

    Middle East / SWANA / MENA

    ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ Sawa 121 / 121 / Free telephone service through the Sawa Foundation and European Union that gives victims of violence psychological support in the Middle East and Northern Africa.

    Oceania

    ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Kids Helpline @ kidshelpline.com.au / 1800-55-1800 / Free 24/7 online and phone counseling service for individuals ages 5 to 25 in Australia.

    Feel like there’s a resource missing? Send national helplines our way and we’ll add ’em!

    This field is required.
  • Veteran Hotlines

    Those who have served in the armed forces are eligible for additional services and benefits. Find out about relevant hotlines here.

    North America

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ณ 211 @ 211.org / 211 / Referral and directory telephone service that connects callers with any/all resources that may be beneficial to their circumstances. 211 is available both in the entirety of the United States and Canada.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ American Red Cross Military and Veteran Services @ redcross.org / 877-272-7337 / Confidential services provided to veterans and their families in the United States through their local, state, and national offices.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ American Veterans for Equal Rights @ aver.us / 678-596-1311 / Nonprofit organization that specializes in supporting LGBTQIA+ US veterans.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Blue Alliance @ blue-alliance.org / US Charity that provides services and support to LGBTQIA+ veterans within the Air Force.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ DAV @ dav.org / 877-426-2838 / Organization that focuses on providing better services to disabled veterans within the United States.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Department of Defense Safe Helpline @ safehelpline.org / 877-995-5247 / Secure, confidential, and anonymous crisis support for members within the military and larger Department of Defense community affected by sexual assault.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Department of Labor Veterans’ Employment and Training Service @ dol.gov / 866-237-0275 / Service under the United States Department of Labor to enable veterans to find suitable and fulfilling work after service.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Hire Heroes USA @ hireheroesusa.org / 844-634-1520 / Organization that connects United States veterans with employment support and various job opportunities.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Military OneSource @ militaryonesource.mil / 800-342-9647 / Official resource network for military members and veterans in the United States to access healthcare, education, counseling, transition care, and social services.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Modern Military Association of America @ modernmilitary.org / 202-328-3244 / Advocacy organization for LGBTQIA+ service members and veterans within the US.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ National Call Center for Homeless Veterans @ va.gov / 877-424-3838 / Official service operated by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs for veterans who are currently homeless or at risk of becoming homeless.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ National Center for PTSD @ ptsd.va.gov / Official education service and resource directory for United States veterans and civilians wanting to find out more about the effects of PTSD.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ National Veterans Legal Services Program @ nvlsp.org / 202-265-8305 / Collective of attorneys that provide their legal expertise for free to United States veterans.

    ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Operational Stress Injury Connect @ veterans.gc.ca / 800-268-7708 / Official app by Veterans Affairs Canada to provide veterans with mental health education, management, and tools.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Operation First Response @ operationfirstresponse.org / 888-289-0280 / Nonprofit charity in the United States that is committed to providing veterans and other first responders with emergency financial assistance.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Real Warriors @ health.mil / 866-966-1020 / Program through the Defense Centers of Excellence for Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injury to provide information and resources on PTSD to United States veterans.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ SPARTA @ spartapride.org / Transgender veterans association that focuses on educating and advocating on transgender-related issues within the United States armed forces.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Team Rubicon @ teamrubiconusa.org / 310-640-8787 / Veteran-led humanitarian organization in the United States that delivers disaster relief and aid across the country.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Transgender American Veterans Association @ transveteran.org / 516-828-2911 / Transgender veterans organization in the United States that advocates for the rights and care for veterans.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ USA Cares @ usacares.org / 800-773-0387 / Emergency financial aid organization for United States veterans and their families.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ VA Benefits Hotline @ va.gov / 800-827-1000 / General hotline and inquiries information about United States veterans benefits.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ VA Caregiver Support Line @ caregiver.va.gov / 855-260-3274 / Free number dedicated to providing information and support to caregivers, family members, friends, community partners, and veterans themselves.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Vet Center Call Center @ vetcenter.va.gov / 877-927-8387 / Confidential call center for combat veterans and their families to find support about transitioning to civilian life.

    ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Veterans Affairs Canada @ veterans.gc.ca / 866-522-2122 / Official service through the government of Canada to provide benefits and services to veterans.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Veterans’ Association @ va.gov / 800-698-2411 / Official United States agency that facilitates the benefits, services, and tools for veterans.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Veteran’s Crisis Line @ veteranscrisisline.net / 988+1 / Crisis line for United States veterans operated by the national 988 suicide prevention hotline, specialized for serving veterans.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Veterans of Foreign Wars Unmet Needs Program @ vfw.org / 866-789-6333 / Nonprofit American organization that provides financial assistance grants to actively serving military members for daily necessities.

    South America

    ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Associaรงรฃo de Veteranos das Forรงas Armadas @ avfab.org.br / 55-11-94235-1984 / Association based in Brazil to support veterans and their needs.

    Europe

    ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Bundeswehr Social Welfare Services @ bundeswehr.de / 49-30-1824-24242 / National agency for armed forces and veterans in Germany.

    ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Combat Stress Helpline @ combatstress.org.uk / 0800-323-4444 / Registered British charity that offers counseling and treatment to veterans.

    ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Deutscher BundeswehrVerband @ dbwv.de / 030-259-260-0 / Non-partisan institution in Germany that represents the interests of veterans and reservists.

    ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Forsvaret Veteran Contact Point @ forsvaret.no/ 91-50-30-03 / Official page of the Norwegian Armed Forces and support services provided to veterans.

    ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Help for Heroes Support Line @ helpforheroes.org.uk / 0300-303-9888 / Welfare program for veterans in the United Kingdom to provide members with healthcare, mental health counseling, finances, education, and community.

    ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Office National des Anciens Combattants et Victimes de Guerre @ onac-vg.fr / Support agency under the Ministry of the Armed Forces in France to support and recognize veterans.

    ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง SSAFA Forcesline @ ssafa.org.uk / 0800-260-6780 / Confidential telephone service that provides emotional support to veterans within the United Kingdom.

    ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Swedish Veterans Federation @ swedishveteran.com / Association in Sweden that raises money for veterans and their families.

    ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Veteran Forbundet SIOPS @ siops.no / 22-69-56-50 / Official veteran services agency under the government of Norway.

    ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Veterans Gateway @ gov.uk / 0808-802-1212 / Official support and welfare program by the United Kingdom for armed forces veterans and their families.

    Asia

    ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ Ex-Servicemen Welfare Department @ desw.gov.in / Service provided by the Indian Ministry of Defense to support veterans.

    ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Japan Self-Defense Forces Veteran Support Office @ mod.go.jp / 03-5366-3111 / Official site for the armed forces of Japan and support services for eligible veterans.

    ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ Military Helpline India / 155306 / Service provided by the Indian Army to offer immediate support to soldiers and veterans.

    Middle East / SWANA / MENA

    ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Israel Ministry of Defense Rehabilitation Department @ mod.gov.il / Agency under the government of Israel to protect and serve the nation as well as provide services to former members.

    ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Zahal Disabled Veterans Organization @ zdvo.org / 972-3-646-1603 / Registered nonprofit organization in Israel that legally represents wounded and disabled veterans.

    Africa

    ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ SAMVO Veterans Helpline @ samvo.international / International organization for service members and veterans of South Africa.

    ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ South African Legion of Military Veterans @ salegion.co.za / 021-689-9771 / Welfare organization that serves veterans of South Africa with case management and accommodation.

    Oceania

    ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ DEFGLIS @ defglis.com.au / Registered charity that supports and represents LGBTQIA+ veterans in Australia.

    ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Department of Veterans’ Affairs General Enquiries @ dva.gov.au / 1800-838-372 / Support services to veterans in Australia.

    ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Open Arms Veterans and Families Counseling @ openarms.gov.au / 1800-011-046 / The leading mental health assessment and counseling provider for veterans in Australia.

    ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Return and Services’ Association Support Services @ rsa.org.nz / 1737 / Mission by the government of New Zealand to support veterans and their families.

    ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Soldier On @ soldieron.org.au / Support agency in Australia that gives services to veterans and family members.

    ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Veterans’ Affairs New Zealand Helpline @ veteransaffairs.mil.nz / 0800-483-8372 / Primary agency that handles the benefits of New Zealand veterans.

    Feel like there’s a resource missing? Send national helplines our way and we’ll add ’em!

    This field is required.
  • Homelessness Hotlines

    Everyone deserves compassion and safety, including emergency shelter and other social services. Find tools and resources centered on houselessness below.

    International

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ณ 211 @ 211.org / 211 / Referral and directory telephone service that connects callers with any/all resources that may be beneficial to their circumstances. 211 is available both in the entirety of the United States and Canada.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ณ Travel’s Aid Hotline @ travelersaid.org / 866-201-7399 / International network of social service agencies, airports, and train stations that work to end homelessness and human trafficking around the globe.

    North America

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Coalition for the Homeless Crisis Intervention Hotline @ coalitionforthehomeless.org / 888-358-2384 / One of the oldest advocacy and direct service organizations for the homeless in the United States, providing crisis care, housing, food, and job training.

    ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Consejo Ciudadano Para la Seguridad y Justica @ consejociudadanomx.org / 55-5533-5533 / Also known as the Safety Hot Line, Mexico’s primary non-emergency telephone center for those seeking support on various social issues.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Disaster Distress Helpline / 800-985-5990 / National service that provides 24/7 crisis support within the United States for anyone experiencing emotional distress due to natural or human-caused disasters such as tornados, severe storms, hurricanes, floods, wildfires, earthquakes, droughts, mass violence, disease outbreaks, and community unrest.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ณ FEANTSA @ feantsa.org / 32-02-538-66-69 / International organization co-funded by the European Union to provide support to homeless individuals.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Feeding America @ feedingamerica.org / 800-771-2303 / Nationwide network of food banks, food pantries, and meal programs in the United States.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Homeless Shelter Directory @ homelessshelterdirectory.org / Network of local shelters and homeless services in the United States.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Human Resources and Services Administration @ hhs.gov / The primary agency under the United States government for supporting the delivery of essential human services which operates and partners with 19 different federal agencies, state and local governments, and other service providers to help homeless individuals.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Miracle Messages @ miraclemessages.org / Nonprofit organization based in the US that provides social support systems to those experiencing homelessness, such as through their family reunification program, phone buddy system, and basic income pilots.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ National Coalition for Homeless Veterans @ nchv.org / 202-546-1969 / National organization focused on ending veteran homelessness in the United States by promoting and shaping legislation as well as managing a referral helpline for at-risk veterans.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ National Healthcare for the Homeless Council @ nhchc.org / 615-226-2292 / Human rights and social justice organization that manages a nationwide healthcare network for homeless individuals in the United States. Additional information about free and low-cost medical, dental, pharmacy, vision, and behavioral services can be found through the National Association of Free and Charitable Clinics at nafcclinics.org.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ National Runaway Safeline @ 1800runaway.org / 800-786-2929 / National communications system for runaway and homeless youth in the United States, which caters to keeping young people as safe and healthy as possible in potentially dangerous situations.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program @ usa.gov / Formerly known as “food stamps,” SNAP is a US welfare program that provides food benefits to low-income families to supplement their grocery budget.

    ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Women, Infants, and Children @ fns.usda.gov / Special supplemental nutrition program for Women, Infants, and Children in the United States to provide federal welfare for low-income pregnant, breastfeeding, and non-breastfeeding people, as well as infants and children up to age five who are at nutritional risk.

    Europe

    ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท 115 @ refugies.info / 115 / Emergency number in France that connects individuals with accommodation centers free of charge.

    ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Advice for Renters @ adviceforrenters.org / Charity organization that offers free housing advice, financial support, and mentoring for those living in the United Kingdom.

    ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง akt @ akt.org.uk / 020-7831-6562 / British organization that specializes in providing emergency housing and services to LGBTQIA+ youth ages 16 to 25.

    ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Centrepoint @ centrepoint.org.uk / 0808-800-0661 / Youth homelessness charity based in the United Kingdom that works primarily with young people ages 16 to 25.

    ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช Citizens Information @ citizensinformation.ie / Homeless information for those in Ireland, with large databases on agencies throughout the country.

    ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Crisis @ crisis.org.uk / National charity in the United Kingdom that helps homeless individuals find the resources and tools needed to thrive.

    ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ HOGAR Sร @ hogarsi.org / 911-108-984 / Social initiative and nonprofit organization in Spain that supports the needs of homeless individuals.

    ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Homeless Counter / 070-353-72-91 / Emergency shelter and social support for homeless people living in the Netherlands and at least 18 years old. Homeless individuals under the age of 18 should contact the Jeugd Interventie Team at 070-302-80-05.

    ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช Homeless Dublin @ homelessdublin.ie / 1800-707-707 / Emergency accommodation for homeless individuals in Ireland.

    ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ท National Emergency Response Mechanism / 30-2132128888 / Service for homeless children or children who are unaccompanied or in otherwise precarious living situations.

    ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Nav @ nav.no / 55-55-33-33 / Emergency accommodation in Norway for those looking for a place to sleep for the next 24 hours.

    ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Samaritans @ samaritans.org / 116-123 / Charity that supports those in crisis in the UK, which includes assisting homeless individuals find necessary resources and aid.

    ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Samusocial @ samusocial.be / 0800-99-340 / Immediate help provided by mobile teams and emergency reception centers in Belgium to help homeless individuals.

    ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Shelter @ england.shelter.org.uk / 0808-800-4444 / Helpline agency that connects individuals with free legal advice and local referrals.

    ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง StreetLink @ thestreetlink.org.uk / Website service for individuals sleeping rough in the United Kingdom, connecting them with their local council and outreach services.

    ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง United Response @ unitedresponse.org.uk / Established charity that specializes in housing needs for individuals with mental health needs and disabilities such as autism, sensory impairments, and dementia.

    Asia

    ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Moyai Support Centre @ npomoyai.or.jp / 81-03-0363-0137 / Social welfare service that helps people living in Japan find everyday essentials/housing and overcome financial hardship.

    Africa

    ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ National Shelter Movement of South Africa Helpline @ nsmsa.org.za / 0800-001-005 / 24/7 helpline in South Africa, with a focus on victims of domestic violence. Also available via text and WhatsApp.

    Oceania

    ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Homelessness Australia @ homelessnessaustralia.org.au / Support and resource organization in Australia with a large database of local helplines and charities centered on helping homeless individuals.

    ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ The People’s Project @ thepeoplesproject.org.nz / 0800-437-348 / New Zealand-based organization that fosters a housing-first approach in helping homeless individuals get back on their feet.

    Feel like there’s a resource missing? Send national helplines our way and we’ll add ’em!

    This field is required.